Suppr超能文献

哮喘控制患者停用长效β2受体激动剂

Long-acting β2-agonist step-off in patients with controlled asthma.

作者信息

Brozek Jan L, Kraft Monica, Krishnan Jerry A, Cloutier Michelle M, Lazarus Stephen C, Li James T, Santesso Nancy, Strunk Robert C, Casale Thomas B

机构信息

Department of Clinical Epidemiology & Biostatistics and Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

Arch Intern Med. 2012 Oct 8;172(18):1365-75. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2012.3250.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Because of concerns about the safety of long-acting β(2)-agonist (LABA) use in patients with asthma, withdrawal of the LABA is recommended by the US Food and Drug Administration once asthma is controlled by combination therapy with a LABA and inhaled corticosteroid (ICS).

OBJECTIVE

To perform a systematic review and meta-analysis assessing evidence supporting the discontinuation of LABA therapy once asthma control has been achieved with a combination of ICS and LABA.

DATA SOURCES

MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials databases were searched (through August 2010), references of identified studies and selected narrative review articles were evaluated, registries of clinical trials were reviewed, and manufacturers of LABAs were contacted.

STUDY SELECTION

Randomized controlled trials of discontinuation of LABA therapy in patients with asthma controlled with a combination of ICS and LABA.

DATA EXTRACTION

Two reviewers independently screened each title and abstract in the initial searches and then the full text of each nominated article to extract data for analyses.

RESULTS

Of 1492 screened articles, only 5 trials involving patients aged 15 years or older fulfilled a priori–specified inclusion criteria. Results did not favor the LABA step-off approach compared with no change in treatment. The LABA step-off regimen increased asthma impairment, with worse Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire score (mean difference [95% CI], 0.32 [0.14-0.51] points lower); worse Asthma Control Questionnaire score (0.24 [0.13-0.35] points higher); fewer symptom-free days (9.15% [1.62%-16.69%] less); and greater risk of withdrawal from study resulting from lack of efficacy or loss of asthma control (risk ratio, 3.27 [2.16-4.96]). Risk of exacerbations and deaths after LABA step-off were not evaluable because of the small number of events and short duration of follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

Evidence suggests that discontinuing LABA therapy in adults and older children with asthma controlled with a combination of ICSs and LABAs results in increased asthma-associated impairment. Additional trials measuring all long-term patient-important outcomes are needed.

摘要

背景

由于担心长效β₂受体激动剂(LABA)用于哮喘患者的安全性,美国食品药品监督管理局建议,一旦哮喘通过LABA与吸入性糖皮质激素(ICS)联合治疗得到控制,应停用LABA。

目的

进行一项系统评价和荟萃分析,评估支持在通过ICS与LABA联合治疗实现哮喘控制后停用LABA治疗的证据。

数据来源

检索了MEDLINE、EMBASE和Cochrane对照试验中央注册库数据库(截至2010年8月),评估了已识别研究的参考文献和选定的叙述性综述文章,查阅了临床试验注册库,并联系了LABA的制造商。

研究选择

关于在通过ICS与LABA联合治疗控制哮喘的患者中停用LABA治疗的随机对照试验。

数据提取

两名研究者在初始检索中独立筛选每个标题和摘要,然后对每篇提名文章的全文进行筛选,以提取数据进行分析。

结果

在1492篇筛选的文章中,只有5项涉及15岁及以上患者的试验符合预先设定的纳入标准。与治疗无变化相比,结果不支持LABA逐步撤药方法。LABA逐步撤药方案增加了哮喘损害,哮喘生活质量问卷评分更差(平均差值[95%CI],低0.32[0.14 - 0.51]分);哮喘控制问卷评分更差(高0.24[0.13 - 0.35]分);无症状天数更少(少9.15%[1.62% - 16.69%]);以及因缺乏疗效或哮喘控制丧失而退出研究的风险更高(风险比,3.27[2.16 - 4.96])。由于事件数量少和随访时间短,LABA逐步撤药后加重和死亡的风险无法评估。

结论

有证据表明,在通过ICS与LABA联合治疗控制哮喘的成人和大龄儿童中停用LABA治疗会导致与哮喘相关的损害增加。需要进行更多测量所有对患者重要的长期结局的试验。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验