• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Kneelax与KT-1000膝关节韧带关节测量仪的比较。

Comparison of Kneelax and KT-1000 knee ligament arthrometers.

作者信息

Paine Russ, Lowe Walter

机构信息

Department of Sports Medicine, Memorial Hermann Sports Medicine Institute, Houston, Texas 77019, USA.

出版信息

J Knee Surg. 2012 May;25(2):151-4. doi: 10.1055/s-0032-1313916.

DOI:10.1055/s-0032-1313916
PMID:22928432
Abstract

Two commercially available knee ligament arthrometers (KT-1000 MEDmetric Corporation, San Diego, California and Kneelax MR Systems, Haarlem, The Netherlands) were used to measure anterior tibial translation. In this study 91 subjects with no history of knee pathology were tested using both devices. Both normal knees were tested and comparison of recorded anterior translation (millimeters) was performed. Absolute numbers at forces of 67N, 89N, 134N, and manual maximum displacements were recorded. Side-to-side differences were calculated and data were compared. There was a significant difference found between the absolute values of each device. The KT-1000 was found to record greater values in millimeters of translation. Although the absolute values were significantly different, the side-to-side differences were not significantly different between devices.

摘要

使用两种市售的膝关节韧带关节测量仪(KT - 1000,MEDmetric公司,加利福尼亚州圣地亚哥;以及Kneelax MR系统,荷兰哈勒姆)测量胫骨前移。在本研究中,使用这两种设备对91名无膝关节病变史的受试者进行了测试。对双侧正常膝关节进行测试,并对记录的前移量(毫米)进行比较。记录了67N、89N、134N力下的绝对值以及手动最大位移。计算双侧差异并比较数据。发现每种设备的绝对值之间存在显著差异。发现KT - 1000记录的平移毫米数更大。尽管绝对值有显著差异,但各设备之间的双侧差异无显著差异。

相似文献

1
Comparison of Kneelax and KT-1000 knee ligament arthrometers.Kneelax与KT-1000膝关节韧带关节测量仪的比较。
J Knee Surg. 2012 May;25(2):151-4. doi: 10.1055/s-0032-1313916.
2
Bench testing of a knee joint arthrometer.
Orthopedics. 2013 Aug;36(8):e1000-6. doi: 10.3928/01477447-20130724-14.
3
Comparative reproducibility of TELOS™ and GNRB® for instrumental measurement of anterior tibial translation in normal knees.TELOS™和GNRB®在正常膝关节中用于胫骨前移仪器测量的比较再现性。
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2015 May;101(3):301-5. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2015.01.007. Epub 2015 Mar 6.
4
Relationship between static anterior laxity using the KT-1000 and dynamic tibial rotation during motion in patients with anatomical anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.解剖学前交叉韧带重建患者中,使用KT-1000测量的静态前向松弛度与运动过程中胫骨动态旋转之间的关系。
Kurume Med J. 2013;60(1):1-6. doi: 10.2739/kurumemedj.ms62002. Epub 2013 Aug 7.
5
Instrumented evaluation of knee laxity: a comparison of five arthrometers.膝关节松弛度的仪器评估:五种关节测量仪的比较
Am J Sports Med. 1992 Mar-Apr;20(2):135-40. doi: 10.1177/036354659202000207.
6
[Reliability of the KT-1000 arthrometer (Medmetric) for measuring anterior knee laxity: comparison with Telos in 147 knees].[用于测量膝关节前向松弛度的KT-1000关节动度计(Medmetric公司)的可靠性:与Telos在147例膝关节中的比较]
Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot. 2004 Dec;90(8):757-64. doi: 10.1016/s0035-1040(04)70756-4.
7
Inter-rater reliability of the GNRB® knee arthrometer.GNRB®膝关节测量仪的评分者间信度。
Knee. 2014 Mar;21(2):541-3. doi: 10.1016/j.knee.2013.10.004. Epub 2013 Oct 29.
8
Measurements of anterior laxity in normal and anterior cruciate absent knees with two instrumented test devices.使用两种仪器化测试设备对正常膝关节和前交叉韧带缺失膝关节的前向松弛度进行测量。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1987 Feb(215):156-61.
9
Healthy knee KT1000 measurements of anterior tibial translation have significant variation.健康膝关节 KT1000 测量的胫骨前向平移有显著的变异性。
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2020 Jul;28(7):2177-2183. doi: 10.1007/s00167-019-05768-w. Epub 2019 Nov 2.
10
The use of an electromagnetic measurement system for anterior tibial displacement during the Lachman test.使用电磁测量系统测量 Lachman 试验中胫骨前位移。
Arthroscopy. 2011 Jun;27(6):792-802. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2011.01.012. Epub 2011 Apr 14.

引用本文的文献

1
The optimal measurement method considering reliability and validity in the anterior knee laxity of anterior cruciate ligament tears.考虑可靠性和有效性的前交叉韧带撕裂前膝松弛度的最佳测量方法。
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2024 Aug;144(8):3523-3532. doi: 10.1007/s00402-024-05465-5. Epub 2024 Aug 6.
2
A new knee arthrometer demonstrated to be reliable and accurate to assess anterior tibial translation in comparison with stress radiographs.一种新的膝关节关节测量器在评估胫骨前平移方面被证明是可靠和准确的,与应力射线照相相比。
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2023 Jun;143(6):3241-3250. doi: 10.1007/s00402-022-04679-9. Epub 2022 Nov 7.
3
Quadriceps tendon autograft for primary ACL reconstruction: a Bayesian network meta-analysis.
前交叉韧带重建中四头肌腱自体移植物:贝叶斯网络荟萃分析。
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2020 Oct;30(7):1129-1138. doi: 10.1007/s00590-020-02680-9. Epub 2020 May 4.
4
Passive anterior tibia translation in anterior cruciate ligament-injured, anterior cruciate ligament-reconstructed and healthy knees: a systematic review.前交叉韧带损伤、前交叉韧带重建及健康膝关节的被动胫骨前移:一项系统评价
Musculoskelet Surg. 2019 Aug;103(2):121-130. doi: 10.1007/s12306-018-0572-6. Epub 2018 Oct 16.
5
High-grade rotatory knee laxity may be predictable in ACL injuries.高度旋转性膝关节松弛可能在 ACL 损伤中具有可预测性。
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2018 Dec;26(12):3762-3769. doi: 10.1007/s00167-018-5019-y. Epub 2018 Jun 21.
6
Macrophage M1 Plays a Positive Role in Aseptic Inflammation-Related Graft Loosening After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Surgery.巨噬细胞 M1 在 ACL 重建术后无菌性炎症相关移植物松动中发挥积极作用。
Inflammation. 2017 Dec;40(6):1815-1824. doi: 10.1007/s10753-017-0616-3.
7
A study of isokinetic strength and laxity with and without anterior cruciate ligament injury.一项关于有无前交叉韧带损伤时等速肌力和松弛度的研究。
J Phys Ther Sci. 2016 Dec;28(12):3272-3275. doi: 10.1589/jpts.28.3272. Epub 2016 Dec 27.
8
Comparison of knee laxity and isokinetic muscle strength in patients with a posterior cruciate ligament injury.后交叉韧带损伤患者膝关节松弛度与等速肌力的比较。
J Phys Ther Sci. 2016 Mar;28(3):831-6. doi: 10.1589/jpts.28.831. Epub 2016 Mar 31.
9
Single-Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction with Semitendinosus Tendon Using the PINN-ACL CrossPin System: Minimum 4-Year Follow-up.使用PINN-ACL CrossPin系统的半腱肌腱单束前交叉韧带重建术:至少4年随访
Knee Surg Relat Res. 2015 Mar;27(1):43-8. doi: 10.5792/ksrr.2015.27.1.43. Epub 2015 Mar 2.
10
[Dorsal sagittal knee joint stability after endoprosthetic knee arthroplasty : Influence of preoperative joint stability and the type of implanted prosthesis].[人工膝关节置换术后膝关节矢状面背侧稳定性:术前关节稳定性及植入假体类型的影响]
Orthopade. 2015 Mar;44(3):226-30. doi: 10.1007/s00132-014-3047-y.