• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

关于认知失调和装病的注释。

A note on cognitive dissonance and malingering.

机构信息

Forensic Psychology Section, Faculty of Psychology and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Clin Neuropsychol. 2012;26(7):1217-29. doi: 10.1080/13854046.2012.710252. Epub 2012 Aug 28.

DOI:10.1080/13854046.2012.710252
PMID:22928617
Abstract

This paper proposes that malingered symptoms may become internalized due to the self-deceptive power of cognitive dissonance. Studies demonstrating how other-deception may turn into self-deception are briefly discussed, as are clinical notions about the overlap between malingering and medically unexplained symptoms. In our view this literature showcases the relevance of cognitive dissonance for research on malingering. A cognitive dissonance perspective may help to clarify how ambiguous sensations may escalate into subjectively compelling symptoms. This perspective suggests that malingered symptom reports are more than just a complication during psychological evaluation. It may generate new research avenues and may clarify practically relevant issues.

摘要

本文提出,由于认知失调的自我欺骗能力,装病症状可能会内化。简要讨论了表明其他欺骗如何转变为自我欺骗的研究,以及关于装病和无法用医学解释的症状之间重叠的临床概念。在我们看来,这些文献展示了认知失调对装病研究的相关性。认知失调的观点可能有助于阐明模糊的感觉如何升级为主观上引人注目的症状。这种观点表明,装病的症状报告不仅仅是心理评估中的一个并发症。它可能会产生新的研究途径,并澄清实际相关的问题。

相似文献

1
A note on cognitive dissonance and malingering.关于认知失调和装病的注释。
Clin Neuropsychol. 2012;26(7):1217-29. doi: 10.1080/13854046.2012.710252. Epub 2012 Aug 28.
2
On the diagnosis of malingered pain-related disability: lessons from cognitive malingering research.关于伪装疼痛相关残疾的诊断:来自认知伪装研究的经验教训。
Spine J. 2005 Jul-Aug;5(4):404-17. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2004.11.016.
3
Malingering in children: fibs and faking.儿童装病:谎言与伪装。
Child Adolesc Psychiatr Clin N Am. 2011 Jul;20(3):547-56. doi: 10.1016/j.chc.2011.03.013.
4
Risk of false positives when identifying malingered profiles using the trauma symptom inventory.使用创伤症状量表识别伪装症状档案时出现假阳性的风险。
J Pers Assess. 2006 Jun;86(3):329-33. doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa8603_08.
5
Diagnostic criteria for malingered neurocognitive dysfunction: proposed standards for clinical practice and research.伪装神经认知功能障碍的诊断标准:临床实践与研究的建议标准。
Clin Neuropsychol. 1999 Nov;13(4):545-61. doi: 10.1076/1385-4046(199911)13:04;1-Y;FT545.
6
The residual effect of feigning: how intentional faking may evolve into a less conscious form of symptom reporting.装假的残留效应:故意装假如何可能演变成一种不太自觉的症状报告形式。
J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2011 Jan;33(1):131-9. doi: 10.1080/13803395.2010.495055. Epub 2010 Jul 9.
7
Deterring malingered psychopathology: The effect of warning simulating malingerers.威慑伪装的精神病理学:警告伪装者的效果。
Behav Sci Law. 2009 Jan-Feb;27(1):35-49. doi: 10.1002/bsl.839.
8
Defrocking the fraud: the detection of malingering.揭露欺诈行为:伪装病的检测
Isr J Psychiatry Relat Sci. 1993;30(2):93-101.
9
Retrograde amnesia and malingering.逆行性遗忘与诈病。
Curr Opin Neurol. 2009 Dec;22(6):601-5. doi: 10.1097/WCO.0b013e32833299bb.
10
American Academy of Clinical Neuropsychology Consensus Conference Statement on the neuropsychological assessment of effort, response bias, and malingering.美国临床神经心理学学会关于努力程度、反应偏差和伪装的神经心理学评估的共识会议声明。
Clin Neuropsychol. 2009 Sep;23(7):1093-129. doi: 10.1080/13854040903155063. Epub 2009 Sep 2.

引用本文的文献

1
Relationship between characteristics of health professionals and the respect for the autonomy of cancer patients at the end of life.卫生专业人员的特征与尊重癌症终末期患者自主权之间的关系。
PLoS One. 2024 Nov 12;19(11):e0313513. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0313513. eCollection 2024.
2
External and internal influences yield similar memory effects: the role of deception and suggestion.外部和内部影响产生相似的记忆效应:欺骗与暗示的作用。
Front Psychol. 2023 Aug 28;14:1081528. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1081528. eCollection 2023.
3
Challenges to the Diagnosis of Functional Neurological Disorder: Feigning, Intentionality, and Responsibility.
功能性神经障碍诊断面临的挑战:伪装、意向性与责任
Neuroethics. 2023;16(1):2. doi: 10.1007/s12152-022-09509-8. Epub 2022 Oct 22.
4
Moral Reminders Do Not Reduce Symptom Over-Reporting Tendencies.道德提醒并不能减少症状过度报告的倾向。
Psychol Inj Law. 2017;10(4):368-384. doi: 10.1007/s12207-017-9303-9. Epub 2017 Nov 11.
5
Effort, symptom validity testing, performance validity testing and traumatic brain injury.努力程度、症状效度测试、表现效度测试与创伤性脑损伤
Brain Inj. 2014;28(13-14):1623-38. doi: 10.3109/02699052.2014.947627. Epub 2014 Sep 12.