Heilbronner Robert L, Sweet Jerry J, Morgan Joel E, Larrabee Glenn J, Millis Scott R
Clin Neuropsychol. 2009 Sep;23(7):1093-129. doi: 10.1080/13854040903155063. Epub 2009 Sep 2.
During the past two decades clinical and research efforts have led to increasingly sophisticated and effective methods and instruments designed to detect exaggeration or fabrication of neuropsychological dysfunction, as well as somatic and psychological symptom complaints. A vast literature based on relevant research has emerged and substantial portions of professional meetings attended by clinical neuropsychologists have addressed topics related to malingering (Sweet, King, Malina, Bergman, & Simmons, 2002). Yet, despite these extensive activities, understanding the need for methods of detecting problematic effort and response bias and addressing the presence or absence of malingering has proven challenging for practitioners. A consensus conference, comprised of national and international experts in clinical neuropsychology, was held at the 2008 Annual Meeting of the American Academy of Clinical Neuropsychology (AACN) for the purposes of refinement of critical issues in this area. This consensus statement documents the current state of knowledge and recommendations of expert clinical neuropsychologists and is intended to assist clinicians and researchers with regard to the neuropsychological assessment of effort, response bias, and malingering.
在过去二十年中,临床和研究工作催生了越来越精密有效的方法和仪器,用于检测神经心理功能障碍以及躯体和心理症状主诉的夸大或编造情况。基于相关研究的大量文献涌现出来,临床神经心理学家参加的专业会议中有很大一部分都涉及到了与伪装(斯威特、金、马利纳、伯格曼和西蒙斯,2002年)相关的主题。然而,尽管有这些广泛的活动,但对于从业者来说,理解检测有问题的努力和反应偏差的方法的必要性以及处理伪装的存在与否已被证明具有挑战性。由临床神经心理学领域的国内和国际专家组成的共识会议于2008年美国临床神经心理学学会(AACN)年会上召开,目的是细化该领域的关键问题。本共识声明记录了专家临床神经心理学家的当前知识状况和建议,旨在协助临床医生和研究人员进行关于努力、反应偏差和伪装的神经心理学评估。