• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

美国临床神经心理学学会关于努力程度、反应偏差和伪装的神经心理学评估的共识会议声明。

American Academy of Clinical Neuropsychology Consensus Conference Statement on the neuropsychological assessment of effort, response bias, and malingering.

作者信息

Heilbronner Robert L, Sweet Jerry J, Morgan Joel E, Larrabee Glenn J, Millis Scott R

出版信息

Clin Neuropsychol. 2009 Sep;23(7):1093-129. doi: 10.1080/13854040903155063. Epub 2009 Sep 2.

DOI:10.1080/13854040903155063
PMID:19735055
Abstract

During the past two decades clinical and research efforts have led to increasingly sophisticated and effective methods and instruments designed to detect exaggeration or fabrication of neuropsychological dysfunction, as well as somatic and psychological symptom complaints. A vast literature based on relevant research has emerged and substantial portions of professional meetings attended by clinical neuropsychologists have addressed topics related to malingering (Sweet, King, Malina, Bergman, & Simmons, 2002). Yet, despite these extensive activities, understanding the need for methods of detecting problematic effort and response bias and addressing the presence or absence of malingering has proven challenging for practitioners. A consensus conference, comprised of national and international experts in clinical neuropsychology, was held at the 2008 Annual Meeting of the American Academy of Clinical Neuropsychology (AACN) for the purposes of refinement of critical issues in this area. This consensus statement documents the current state of knowledge and recommendations of expert clinical neuropsychologists and is intended to assist clinicians and researchers with regard to the neuropsychological assessment of effort, response bias, and malingering.

摘要

在过去二十年中,临床和研究工作催生了越来越精密有效的方法和仪器,用于检测神经心理功能障碍以及躯体和心理症状主诉的夸大或编造情况。基于相关研究的大量文献涌现出来,临床神经心理学家参加的专业会议中有很大一部分都涉及到了与伪装(斯威特、金、马利纳、伯格曼和西蒙斯,2002年)相关的主题。然而,尽管有这些广泛的活动,但对于从业者来说,理解检测有问题的努力和反应偏差的方法的必要性以及处理伪装的存在与否已被证明具有挑战性。由临床神经心理学领域的国内和国际专家组成的共识会议于2008年美国临床神经心理学学会(AACN)年会上召开,目的是细化该领域的关键问题。本共识声明记录了专家临床神经心理学家的当前知识状况和建议,旨在协助临床医生和研究人员进行关于努力、反应偏差和伪装的神经心理学评估。

相似文献

1
American Academy of Clinical Neuropsychology Consensus Conference Statement on the neuropsychological assessment of effort, response bias, and malingering.美国临床神经心理学学会关于努力程度、反应偏差和伪装的神经心理学评估的共识会议声明。
Clin Neuropsychol. 2009 Sep;23(7):1093-129. doi: 10.1080/13854040903155063. Epub 2009 Sep 2.
2
A survey of neuropsychologists' beliefs and practices with respect to the assessment of effort.一项关于神经心理学家在努力评估方面的信念和实践的调查。
Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2007 Feb;22(2):213-23. doi: 10.1016/j.acn.2006.12.004. Epub 2007 Feb 5.
3
Diagnostic criteria for malingered neurocognitive dysfunction: proposed standards for clinical practice and research.伪装神经认知功能障碍的诊断标准:临床实践与研究的建议标准。
Clin Neuropsychol. 1999 Nov;13(4):545-61. doi: 10.1076/1385-4046(199911)13:04;1-Y;FT545.
4
The latent structure of cognitive symptom exaggeration on the Victoria Symptom Validity Test.维多利亚症状效度测试中认知症状夸大的潜在结构。
Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2007 Feb;22(2):197-211. doi: 10.1016/j.acn.2006.12.007. Epub 2007 Feb 2.
5
Critiquing symptom validity tests for posttraumatic stress disorder: a modification of Hartman's criteria.对创伤后应激障碍症状效度测试的批判:哈特曼标准的修订
J Anxiety Disord. 2008 Dec;22(8):1542-50. doi: 10.1016/j.janxdis.2008.03.008. Epub 2008 Mar 13.
6
American Academy of Clinical Neuropsychology (AACN) 2021 consensus statement on validity assessment: Update of the 2009 AACN consensus conference statement on neuropsychological assessment of effort, response bias, and malingering.美国临床神经心理学学会(AACN)2021 年关于效度评估的共识声明:对 2009 年 AACN 关于努力、反应偏差和伪装的神经心理评估共识会议声明的更新。
Clin Neuropsychol. 2021 Aug;35(6):1053-1106. doi: 10.1080/13854046.2021.1896036. Epub 2021 Apr 6.
7
Evaluating constructs represented by symptom validity tests in forensic neuropsychological assessment of traumatic brain injury.评估创伤性脑损伤法医神经心理学评估中症状效度测试所代表的结构。
J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2009 Mar-Apr;24(2):105-22. doi: 10.1097/HTR.0b013e31819b1210.
8
Clinical myths of forensic neuropsychology.法医神经心理学的临床误区
Clin Neuropsychol. 2009 Feb;23(2):286-96. doi: 10.1080/13854040802104873.
9
Utilization rates of ecologically oriented instruments among clinical neuropsychologists.临床神经心理学家对生态导向工具的使用率。
Clin Neuropsychol. 2007 Sep;21(5):727-43. doi: 10.1080/13854040600888776.
10
Embedded effort scales in the repeatable battery for the assessment of neuropsychological status: do they detect neurocognitive malingering?用于评估神经心理状态的可重复成套测验中的嵌入式努力量表:它们能检测出神经认知功能伪装吗?
Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2015 May;30(3):181-5. doi: 10.1093/arclin/acv002. Epub 2015 Feb 11.

引用本文的文献

1
Aligning metrics with meaning: considerations for measurement selection in disability evaluation.使指标与意义相匹配:残疾评估中测量选择的考量因素
Front Rehabil Sci. 2025 Aug 14;6:1657105. doi: 10.3389/fresc.2025.1657105. eCollection 2025.
2
Model-Based Person Fit Statistics Applied to the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale IV.基于模型的个体拟合统计量应用于韦氏成人智力量表第四版。
Educ Psychol Meas. 2025 Aug 3:00131644251339444. doi: 10.1177/00131644251339444.
3
Prevalence of symptom exaggeration among North American independent medical evaluation examinees: A systematic review of observational studies.
北美独立医学评估受检者中症状夸大的患病率:观察性研究的系统评价
PLoS One. 2025 Jun 25;20(6):e0324684. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0324684. eCollection 2025.
4
Institutional Design of Forest Landscape Restoration in Central Togo: Informing Policy-making through Q Methodology Analysis.多哥中部森林景观恢复的制度设计:通过Q方法分析为政策制定提供信息
Environ Manage. 2025 May;75(5):1239-1256. doi: 10.1007/s00267-025-02137-x. Epub 2025 Mar 3.
5
Using behavior and eye-fixations to detect feigned memory impairment.利用行为和眼动注视来检测伪装的记忆损伤。
Front Psychol. 2024 Sep 20;15:1395434. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1395434. eCollection 2024.
6
Cognitive Underperformance in a Mixed Neuropsychiatric Sample at Diagnostic Evaluation of Adult ADHD.成人注意力缺陷多动障碍诊断评估中混合神经精神样本的认知功能低下
J Clin Med. 2023 Nov 4;12(21):6926. doi: 10.3390/jcm12216926.
7
Cross validation of the Personality Assessment Inventory (PAI) Cognitive Bias Scale of Scales (CB-SOS) over-reporting indicators in a military sample.在军事样本中对人格评估量表(PAI)认知偏差量表(CB-SOS)的虚报指标进行交叉验证。
Mil Psychol. 2024 Mar-Apr;36(2):192-202. doi: 10.1080/08995605.2022.2160151. Epub 2023 Jan 5.
8
Review of Statistical and Methodological Issues in the Forensic Prediction of Malingering from Validity Tests: Part II-Methodological Issues.从效度测试对伪装进行法医预测中的统计和方法学问题综述:第二部分——方法学问题。
Neuropsychol Rev. 2023 Sep;33(3):604-623. doi: 10.1007/s11065-023-09602-6. Epub 2023 Aug 18.
9
Questioning What We Thought We Knew: Commentary on Leonhard's Performance Validity Assessment Articles.质疑我们自认为已知的:对莱昂哈德表现效度评估文章的评论
Neuropsychol Rev. 2023 Sep;33(3):624-627. doi: 10.1007/s11065-023-09603-5. Epub 2023 Aug 18.
10
A proof-of-concept study exploring the effects of impulsivity on a gamified version of the stop-signal task in children.一项概念验证研究,探讨冲动性对儿童版游戏化停止信号任务的影响。
Front Psychol. 2023 Feb 9;14:1068229. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1068229. eCollection 2023.