Department of Philosophy, Dalhousie University, Halifax B3H 4P9, Canada.
Behav Brain Sci. 2012 Oct;35(5):279-80. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X12000015. Epub 2012 Aug 29.
Frost has given us good reason to question the universality of existing computational models of reading. Yet, he has not provided arguments showing that all languages share fundamental and invariant reading universals. His goal of outlining the blueprint principles for a universal model of reading is premature. Further, it is questionable whether natural evolution can provide the optimal solutions that Frost invokes.
弗罗斯特有充分的理由让我们质疑现有的阅读计算模型的普遍性。然而，他并没有提供论据表明所有语言都具有基本的、不变的阅读普遍性。他概述通用阅读模型蓝图原则的目标尚不成熟。此外，自然进化是否能提供弗罗斯特所援引的最佳解决方案也是值得怀疑的。
