Suppr超能文献

双气囊内镜下插入深度测量的有效性。

Validity of insertion depth measurement in double-balloon endoscopy.

机构信息

Anatomy and Comparative Pathology, University of Murcia, Murcia, Spain.

出版信息

Endoscopy. 2012 Nov;44(11):1045-50. doi: 10.1055/s-0032-1310106. Epub 2012 Aug 28.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS

In double-balloon enteroscopy (DBE) the use of a reliable and practical method to calculate the insertion depth of the endoscope could help to improve diagnosis accuracy and optimize the effort and cost of the technique. The objectives of this work were to compare and evaluate two methods of estimating the insertion depth and to obtain a descriptive model capable of representing the exploration dynamics and efficiency in terms of advanced distance and time.

METHODS

Oral DBE was performed in 25 pigs. Insertion depth was calculated during the procedure by: 1) estimation of time and distance for each push and pull cycle during progression; and 2) estimation of distance during withdrawal. At the maximum insertion depth a tattoo was placed, and the observed measures for the two methods were compared with the distance between the pylorus and the mark after euthanasia and necropsy of the animals 1 week after DBE.

RESULTS

The average insertion depth during progression, withdrawal, and after necropsy was 324.92 cm, 317.23 cm, and 342.05 cm, respectively (P Anova = 0.72). The Pearson correlation coefficient (r > 0.85; P < 0.001) and paired Brand - Altman plots demonstrated high agreement between progression and necropsy (0.03 % difference) and between withdrawal and necropsy (6.9 % difference). The exploration dynamics and efficiency in terms of advanced distance per cycle and time fitted to potential and logarithmic regression models, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Measurement of insertion depth in vivo was validated in the porcine model during progression and withdrawal. Estimation during progression was more accurate and allowed exploration dynamics and efficiency to be plotted, which might be used as approximate reference values for humans.

摘要

背景与研究目的

在双气囊内镜(DBE)中,使用一种可靠且实用的方法来计算内镜的插入深度,有助于提高诊断准确性,并优化该技术的工作效率和成本。本研究旨在比较和评估两种估计插入深度的方法,并获得一种能够代表在推进过程中距离和时间方面的探索动力学和效率的描述性模型。

方法

在 25 头猪中进行经口 DBE。在操作过程中通过以下两种方法来计算插入深度:1)估计推进过程中每个推送和拉动周期的时间和距离;2)估计撤回过程中的距离。在最大插入深度时,在猪的体表放置一个纹身标记,然后比较两种方法测量的标记到幽门之间的距离与动物在 DBE 后 1 周安乐死和剖检时的实际距离。

结果

推进、撤回和剖检时的平均插入深度分别为 324.92cm、317.23cm 和 342.05cm(P Anova = 0.72)。Pearson 相关系数(r > 0.85;P < 0.001)和配对的 Bland - Altman 图显示了推进和剖检(差异 0.03%)以及撤回和剖检(差异 6.9%)之间的高度一致性。每个周期推进的距离和时间的探索动力学和效率分别拟合到潜在和对数回归模型中。

结论

在猪模型中,我们验证了在推进和撤回过程中体内插入深度的测量方法。推进时的估计更准确,并允许绘制探索动力学和效率图,这可能作为人体的近似参考值。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验