• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用植入扭矩装置比较直壁和锥形种植体的初始稳定性。

Comparison of primary stability of straight-walled and tapered implants using an insertion torque device.

机构信息

Department of Biomedical Sciences and Human Oncology, Universita di Torino, Torino, Italy.

出版信息

Int J Prosthodont. 2012 Sep-Oct;25(5):465-71.

PMID:22930768
Abstract

PURPOSE

Implant geometry has a major impact on insertion torque values and primary stability, and bone engagement during implant insertion differs according to implant morphology. Primary stability of straight-walled and tapered implants was compared using insertion torque monitoring.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 57 implants (36 straight-walled OSSEOTITE and 21 tapered OSSEOTITE NT) were inserted in 20 patients. Implant torque values and insertion times were recorded, and the data were processed and interpolated to determine torque as a function of time.

RESULTS

Tapered implants required less insertion time and a higher insertion torque than straight-walled implants; this provided better primary stability, although the success rate was 86% for tapered and 100% for straight-walled implants.

CONCLUSIONS

Tapered implants showed better primary stability than straight-walled implants but had a lower success rate. The authors suggest that in low-density bone, in which only a thin dense cortical layer can contribute to primary stability, a higher insertion torque can lead to the destruction of peri-implant bone, compromising osseointegration.

摘要

目的

种植体的几何形态对种植体的初始稳定性和旋入扭矩值有很大的影响,而且不同种植体的形态在种植体旋入过程中对骨质的初始嵌合力也不同。本研究通过扭矩监测对直壁式和非直壁式种植体的初始稳定性进行了比较。

材料和方法

20 例患者共植入 57 枚种植体(36 枚 OSSEOTITE 直壁式种植体和 21 枚 OSSEOTITE NT 非直壁式种植体)。记录了种植体的扭矩值和旋入时间,并对数据进行了处理和内插,以确定扭矩随时间的变化。

结果

与直壁式种植体相比,非直壁式种植体需要的旋入时间更短,初始扭矩更高,因此初始稳定性更好,但其成功率为 86%,而直壁式种植体的成功率为 100%。

结论

与直壁式种植体相比,非直壁式种植体具有更好的初始稳定性,但成功率较低。作者认为,在骨密度较低的情况下,只有较薄的致密皮质骨层能对初始稳定性产生影响,较高的初始扭矩可能导致种植体周围骨的破坏,影响骨整合。

相似文献

1
Comparison of primary stability of straight-walled and tapered implants using an insertion torque device.使用植入扭矩装置比较直壁和锥形种植体的初始稳定性。
Int J Prosthodont. 2012 Sep-Oct;25(5):465-71.
2
Influence of surgical technique and surface roughness on the primary stability of an implant in artificial bone with different cortical thickness: a laboratory study.不同皮质骨厚度人工骨中手术技术和表面粗糙度对种植体初期稳定性的影响:一项实验室研究。
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2010 Feb;21(2):213-20. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01823.x.
3
Initial torque stability of a new bone condensing dental implant. A cohort study of 140 consecutively placed implants.一种新型骨挤压式牙种植体的初始扭矩稳定性。一项对140颗连续植入种植体的队列研究。
J Oral Implantol. 2009;35(6):277-82. doi: 10.1563/AAID-JOI-D-09-00020.1.
4
Influence of the surgical technique and surface roughness on the primary stability of an implant in artificial bone with a density equivalent to maxillary bone: a laboratory study.手术技术和表面粗糙度对上颌骨密度等效的人工骨中种植体初期稳定性的影响:一项实验室研究。
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2009 Apr;20(4):327-32. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2008.01692.x.
5
Correlation Between Implant Geometry, Implant Surface, Insertion Torque, and Primary Stability: In Vitro Biomechanical Analysis.种植体几何形状、种植体表面、植入扭矩与初期稳定性之间的相关性:体外生物力学分析
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2018 Jul/Aug;33(4):824-830. doi: 10.11607/jomi.6285.
6
Undersized implant site preparation to enhance primary implant stability in poor bone density: a prospective clinical study.采用小型种植体植入位点预备技术提高骨密度不佳患者种植体初期稳定性的前瞻性临床研究。
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2011 Dec;69(12):e506-12. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2011.08.007.
7
Primary stability determination by means of insertion torque and RFA in a sample of 4,135 implants.在 4135 个种植体样本中,通过旋入扭矩和 RFA 确定初始稳定性。
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2012 Aug;14(4):501-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2010.00302.x. Epub 2010 Sep 17.
8
Clinical outcome of dental implants placed with high insertion torques (up to 176 Ncm).高植入扭矩(高达 176 Ncm)下植入的牙科种植体的临床效果。
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2013 Apr;15(2):227-33. doi: 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2011.00351.x. Epub 2011 May 20.
9
High versus low implant insertion torque: a histologic, histomorphometric, and biomechanical study in the sheep mandible.高与低种植体植入扭矩:绵羊下颌骨的组织学、组织形态计量学和生物力学研究。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2011 Jul-Aug;26(4):837-49.
10
Self-cutting blades and their influence on primary stability of tapered dental implants in a simulated low-density bone model: a laboratory study.自切割刀片及其对模拟低密度骨模型中锥形牙种植体初期稳定性的影响:一项实验室研究
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2011 Nov;112(5):573-80. doi: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2010.12.001. Epub 2011 Mar 24.

引用本文的文献

1
The Utility of Evaluating Primary Stability of Implants Using Accumulated Insertion Torque Values: a Preliminary Study.使用累积植入扭矩值评估种植体初期稳定性的效用:一项初步研究。
J Oral Maxillofac Res. 2025 Jun 30;16(2):e4. doi: 10.5037/jomr.2025.16206. eCollection 2025 Apr-Jun.
2
A Multicenter Study of Factors Related to Early Implant Failures-Part 1: Implant Materials and Surgical Techniques.早期种植失败相关因素的多中心研究——第1部分:种植材料与手术技术
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2025 Feb;27(1):e70015. doi: 10.1111/cid.70015.
3
Comparative evaluation of implant stability and crestal bone level between tapered and cylindrical implants in the posterior regions of the mandible: A prospective, randomized, split-mouth clinical trial.
下颌后部区域锥形种植体与圆柱形种植体的种植体稳定性和嵴顶骨水平的比较评估:一项前瞻性、随机、分口临床试验。
Natl J Maxillofac Surg. 2023 May-Aug;14(2):242-248. doi: 10.4103/njms.njms_514_21. Epub 2023 Jul 13.
4
Relationship between Implant Geometry and Primary Stability in Different Bony Defects and Variant Bone Densities: An In Vitro Study.不同骨缺损和不同骨密度下种植体几何形状与初期稳定性的关系:一项体外研究
Materials (Basel). 2020 Sep 30;13(19):4349. doi: 10.3390/ma13194349.
5
Effect of macro-design in the primary stability of short and extra-short implants using resonance frequency analysis. An ex vivo study.使用共振频率分析评估宏观设计对短种植体和超短种植体初期稳定性的影响:一项体外研究
J Oral Biol Craniofac Res. 2020 Oct-Dec;10(4):603-607. doi: 10.1016/j.jobcr.2020.08.020. Epub 2020 Aug 29.
6
Evaluation of Insertion Energy as Novel Parameter for Dental Implant Stability.评估植入能量作为牙种植体稳定性的新参数
J Clin Med. 2020 Sep 15;9(9):2977. doi: 10.3390/jcm9092977.
7
Does intraoperative bone density testing correlate with parameters of primary implant stability? A pilot study in minipigs.术中骨密度检测与初次种植体稳定性参数相关吗?一项小型猪的初步研究。
Clin Exp Dent Res. 2019 Sep 30;5(6):594-600. doi: 10.1002/cre2.224. eCollection 2019 Dec.
8
Correlation between Implant Geometry, Bone Density, and the Insertion Torque/Depth Integral: A Study on Bovine Ribs.种植体几何形状、骨密度与植入扭矩/深度积分之间的相关性:一项关于牛肋骨的研究。
Dent J (Basel). 2019 Mar 5;7(1):25. doi: 10.3390/dj7010025.
9
Effect of implant macrogeometry on peri-implant healing outcomes: a randomized clinical trial.种植体宏观形态对种植体周围愈合效果的影响:一项随机临床试验。
Clin Oral Investig. 2019 Feb;23(2):567-575. doi: 10.1007/s00784-018-2463-5. Epub 2018 May 3.
10
In vitro comparison of primary stability of two implant designs in D3 bone.两种种植体设计在D3型骨中的初期稳定性的体外比较。
Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2017 Jul 1;22(4):e473-e477. doi: 10.4317/medoral.21714.