Grobecker-Karl Tanja, Dickinson Anthony, Heckmann Siegfried, Karl Matthias, Steiner Constanze
Department of Prosthodontics, Saarland University, Kirrberger Strasse 100, 66421 Homburg, Germany.
Private Prosthodontic Practice, 1564 Malvern Road, Glen Iris 3146, Australia.
J Clin Med. 2020 Sep 15;9(9):2977. doi: 10.3390/jcm9092977.
Insertion energy has been advocated as a novel measure for primary implant stability, but the effect of implant length, diameter, or surgical protocol remains unclear. Twenty implants from one specific bone level implant system were placed in layered polyurethane foam measuring maximum insertion torque, torque-time curves, and primary stability using resonance frequency analysis (RFA). Insertion energy was calculated as area under torque-time curve applying the trapezoidal formula. Statistical analysis was based on analysis of variance, Tukey honest differences tests and Pearson's product moment correlation tests (α = 0.05). Implant stability ( = 0.01) and insertion energy ( < 0.01) differed significantly among groups, while maximum insertion torque did not ( = 0.17). Short implants showed a significant decrease in implant stability ( = 0.01), while reducing implant diameter did not cause any significant effect. Applying the drilling protocol for dense bone resulted in significantly increased insertion energy ( = 0.02) but a significant decrease in implant stability ( = 0.04). Insertion energy was not found to be a more reliable parameter for evaluating primary implant stability when compared to maximum insertion torque and resonance frequency analysis.
植入能量已被倡导作为评估种植体初期稳定性的一种新方法,但种植体长度、直径或手术方案的影响仍不明确。从一个特定骨水平种植系统中选取20颗种植体,植入分层聚氨酯泡沫中,使用共振频率分析(RFA)测量最大植入扭矩、扭矩-时间曲线和初期稳定性。植入能量通过应用梯形公式计算扭矩-时间曲线下的面积得出。统计分析基于方差分析、Tukey真实差异检验和Pearson积矩相关检验(α = 0.05)。各组之间种植体稳定性( = 0.01)和植入能量( < 0.01)差异显著,而最大植入扭矩无显著差异( = 0.17)。短种植体的种植体稳定性显著降低( = 0.01),而减小种植体直径未产生任何显著影响。应用致密骨钻孔方案导致植入能量显著增加( = 0.02),但种植体稳定性显著降低( = 0.04)。与最大植入扭矩和共振频率分析相比,未发现植入能量是评估种植体初期稳定性更可靠的参数。