• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

CAD 评分:一种基于接触面积差异的新函数,用于评估蛋白质结构模型。

CAD-score: a new contact area difference-based function for evaluation of protein structural models.

机构信息

Institute of Biotechnology, Vilnius University, Graičiūno 8, LT-02241 Vilnius, Lithuania.

出版信息

Proteins. 2013 Jan;81(1):149-62. doi: 10.1002/prot.24172. Epub 2012 Sep 29.

DOI:10.1002/prot.24172
PMID:22933340
Abstract

Evaluation of protein models against the native structure is essential for the development and benchmarking of protein structure prediction methods. Although a number of evaluation scores have been proposed to date, many aspects of model assessment still lack desired robustness. In this study we present CAD-score, a new evaluation function quantifying differences between physical contacts in a model and the reference structure. The new score uses the concept of residue-residue contact area difference (CAD) introduced by Abagyan and Totrov (J Mol Biol 1997; 268:678-685). Contact areas, the underlying basis of the score, are derived using the Voronoi tessellation of protein structure. The newly introduced CAD-score is a continuous function, confined within fixed limits, free of any arbitrary thresholds or parameters. The built-in logic for treatment of missing residues allows consistent ranking of models of any degree of completeness. We tested CAD-score on a large set of diverse models and compared it to GDT-TS, a widely accepted measure of model accuracy. Similarly to GDT-TS, CAD-score showed a robust performance on single-domain proteins, but displayed a stronger preference for physically more realistic models. Unlike GDT-TS, the new score revealed a balanced assessment of domain rearrangement, removing the necessity for different treatment of single-domain, multi-domain, and multi-subunit structures. Moreover, CAD-score makes it possible to assess the accuracy of inter-domain or inter-subunit interfaces directly. In addition, the approach offers an alternative to the superposition-based model clustering. The CAD-score implementation is available both as a web server and a standalone software package at http://www.ibt.lt/bioinformatics/cad-score/.

摘要

评估蛋白质模型与天然结构的吻合程度对于开发和基准测试蛋白质结构预测方法至关重要。尽管迄今为止已经提出了许多评估分数,但模型评估的许多方面仍然缺乏所需的稳健性。在本研究中,我们提出了 CAD 分数,这是一种新的评估函数,用于量化模型和参考结构中物理接触的差异。新的分数使用了 Abagyan 和 Totrov 提出的残基-残基接触面积差异(CAD)的概念(J Mol Biol 1997; 268:678-685)。接触面积是分数的基础,使用蛋白质结构的 Voronoi 细分来获得。新引入的 CAD 分数是一个连续函数,限制在固定范围内,没有任何任意的阈值或参数。用于处理缺失残基的内置逻辑允许对任何完整程度的模型进行一致的排名。我们在一组多样化的模型上测试了 CAD 分数,并将其与广泛接受的模型准确性衡量标准 GDT-TS 进行了比较。与 GDT-TS 类似,CAD 分数在单域蛋白上表现出稳健的性能,但对物理上更现实的模型表现出更强的偏好。与 GDT-TS 不同,新分数揭示了对结构域重排的平衡评估,无需对单域、多域和多亚基结构进行不同的处理。此外,CAD 分数使得评估结构域间或亚基间界面的准确性成为可能。此外,该方法提供了一种替代基于叠加的模型聚类的方法。CAD 分数的实现既可以作为网络服务器,也可以作为独立的软件包在 http://www.ibt.lt/bioinformatics/cad-score/ 上使用。

相似文献

1
CAD-score: a new contact area difference-based function for evaluation of protein structural models.CAD 评分:一种基于接触面积差异的新函数,用于评估蛋白质结构模型。
Proteins. 2013 Jan;81(1):149-62. doi: 10.1002/prot.24172. Epub 2012 Sep 29.
2
Contact Area-Based Structural Analysis of Proteins and Their Complexes Using CAD-Score.基于接触面积的蛋白质及其复合物的结构分析方法(CAD-Score)
Methods Mol Biol. 2020;2112:75-90. doi: 10.1007/978-1-0716-0270-6_6.
3
Prediction of global and local quality of CASP8 models by MULTICOM series.MULTICOM 系列预测 CASP8 模型的全局和局部质量。
Proteins. 2009;77 Suppl 9:181-4. doi: 10.1002/prot.22487.
4
Assessment of domain boundary predictions and the prediction of intramolecular contacts in CASP8.评估域边界预测和 CASP8 中分子内接触的预测。
Proteins. 2009;77 Suppl 9:196-209. doi: 10.1002/prot.22554.
5
VoroMQA: Assessment of protein structure quality using interatomic contact areas.VoroMQA:利用原子间接触面积评估蛋白质结构质量
Proteins. 2017 Jun;85(6):1131-1145. doi: 10.1002/prot.25278. Epub 2017 Mar 24.
6
Contact area difference (CAD): a robust measure to evaluate accuracy of protein models.接触面积差异(CAD):一种评估蛋白质模型准确性的可靠方法。
J Mol Biol. 1997 May 9;268(3):678-85. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.1997.0994.
7
Scoring function for automated assessment of protein structure template quality.用于自动评估蛋白质结构模板质量的评分函数。
Proteins. 2004 Dec 1;57(4):702-10. doi: 10.1002/prot.20264.
8
Evaluation of methods for predicting the topology of beta-barrel outer membrane proteins and a consensus prediction method.β-桶状外膜蛋白拓扑结构预测方法的评估及一种共识预测方法
BMC Bioinformatics. 2005 Jan 12;6:7. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-6-7.
9
Pcons5: combining consensus, structural evaluation and fold recognition scores.Pcons5:结合共识、结构评估和折叠识别分数。
Bioinformatics. 2005 Dec 1;21(23):4248-54. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bti702. Epub 2005 Oct 4.
10
Prediction of global and local model quality in CASP8 using the ModFOLD server.利用 ModFOLD 服务器预测 CASP8 中的全局和局部模型质量。
Proteins. 2009;77 Suppl 9:185-90. doi: 10.1002/prot.22491.

引用本文的文献

1
Estimating protein complex model accuracy using graph transformers and pairwise similarity graphs.使用图变换器和成对相似性图估计蛋白质复合物模型的准确性。
Bioinform Adv. 2025 Jul 29;5(1):vbaf180. doi: 10.1093/bioadv/vbaf180. eCollection 2025.
2
CASP16 protein monomer structure prediction assessment.半胱天冬酶16(CASP16)蛋白单体结构预测评估
bioRxiv. 2025 Jun 2:2025.05.29.656942. doi: 10.1101/2025.05.29.656942.
3
A hybrid variational autoencoder and WGAN with gradient penalty for tertiary protein structure generation.一种用于三级蛋白质结构生成的混合变分自编码器和带梯度惩罚的 Wasserstein 生成对抗网络。
Sci Rep. 2025 Apr 23;15(1):14191. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-94747-y.
4
TopoQA: a topological deep learning-based approach for protein complex structure interface quality assessment.TopoQA:一种基于拓扑深度学习的蛋白质复合物结构界面质量评估方法。
Brief Bioinform. 2025 Mar 4;26(2). doi: 10.1093/bib/bbaf083.
5
Estimating Protein Complex Model Accuracy Using Graph Transformers and Pairwise Similarity Graphs.使用图变换器和成对相似性图估计蛋白质复合物模型的准确性。
bioRxiv. 2025 Feb 23:2025.02.04.636562. doi: 10.1101/2025.02.04.636562.
6
Physical-aware model accuracy estimation for protein complex using deep learning method.基于深度学习方法的蛋白质复合物物理感知模型准确性估计
Comput Struct Biotechnol J. 2025 Jan 22;27:478-487. doi: 10.1016/j.csbj.2025.01.017. eCollection 2025.
7
Has AlphaFold3 achieved success for RNA?AlphaFold3在RNA方面取得成功了吗?
Acta Crystallogr D Struct Biol. 2025 Feb 1;81(Pt 2):49-62. doi: 10.1107/S2059798325000592. Epub 2025 Jan 27.
8
A Survey of Deep Learning Methods for Estimating the Accuracy of Protein Quaternary Structure Models.深度学习方法估计蛋白质四级结构模型准确性的研究综述。
Biomolecules. 2024 May 13;14(5):574. doi: 10.3390/biom14050574.
9
State-of-the-RNArt: benchmarking current methods for RNA 3D structure prediction.RNA领域现状:RNA三维结构预测当前方法的基准测试
NAR Genom Bioinform. 2024 May 14;6(2):lqae048. doi: 10.1093/nargab/lqae048. eCollection 2024 Jun.
10
LoCoHD: a metric for comparing local environments of proteins.LoCoHD:一种用于比较蛋白质局部环境的度量。
Nat Commun. 2024 May 13;15(1):4029. doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-48225-0.