• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

参与基于网络的药物不良反应监测系统的糖尿病患者的代表性。

Representativeness of diabetes patients participating in a web-based adverse drug reaction monitoring system.

机构信息

Netherlands Pharmacovigilance Centre Lareb, 's-Hertogenbosch, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2013 Mar;22(3):250-5. doi: 10.1002/pds.3341. Epub 2012 Aug 30.

DOI:10.1002/pds.3341
PMID:22933342
Abstract

PURPOSE

Lareb Intensive Monitoring, LIM, is a non-interventional observational cohort method which follows first-time users of certain drugs during a certain period of time and collects information about adverse drug reactions, ADRs. In order for LIM to be a useful pharmacovigilance tool, it is important to know whether the LIM population is comparable to the whole population using the drug. The aim of this study is to compare the LIM diabetes population with an external diabetes reference population on characteristics that may influence the patient's susceptibility for ADRs.

METHODS

In this study, a LIM diabetes population was compared to a reference diabetes population derived from The Groningen Initiative to ANalyse Type 2 diabetes Treatment project. Comparisons were made regarding age, gender, body mass index and polypharmacy, as well as diabetes medication used and disease/treatment duration.

RESULTS

LIM patients were more often men (58.5% vs 50.8%) and in general younger (59.1 vs 64.7 years) and healthier, by that meaning they had a higher percentage of de novo treated patients (55.5% vs 53.2%), a shorter diabetes treatment duration (3.7 vs 5.5 years) and used less co-medication than patients in the reference population.

CONCLUSIONS

This study shows that diabetes patients participating in a web-based intensive monitoring system differ from a reference population. The observed differences might lead to an underestimation of ADRs, but it is not clear whether this would also influence the type or time-course of the reported ADRs. When interpreting results from LIM studies, one should take these differences into account.

摘要

目的

Lareb 强化监测(LIM)是一种非干预性观察队列方法,它在一定时间内跟踪某些药物的首次使用者,并收集有关药物不良反应(ADR)的信息。为了使 LIM 成为一种有用的药物警戒工具,了解 LIM 人群是否与使用该药物的整个人群具有可比性非常重要。本研究的目的是比较 LIM 糖尿病患者人群与外部糖尿病参考人群在可能影响患者对 ADR 易感性的特征方面的差异。

方法

在这项研究中,将 LIM 糖尿病患者人群与源自格罗宁根分析 2 型糖尿病治疗项目的参考糖尿病患者人群进行比较。比较的内容包括年龄、性别、体重指数和多药治疗,以及所使用的糖尿病药物和疾病/治疗持续时间。

结果

LIM 患者中男性患者(58.5% vs. 50.8%)和总体上更年轻(59.1 岁 vs. 64.7 岁)且更健康,这意味着他们有更高比例的新诊断治疗患者(55.5% vs. 53.2%),糖尿病治疗持续时间更短(3.7 年 vs. 5.5 年),并且使用的合并用药比参考人群少。

结论

本研究表明,参与基于网络的强化监测系统的糖尿病患者与参考人群存在差异。观察到的差异可能导致 ADR 报告的低估,但尚不清楚这是否也会影响报告 ADR 的类型或时间进程。在解释 LIM 研究结果时,应考虑到这些差异。

相似文献

1
Representativeness of diabetes patients participating in a web-based adverse drug reaction monitoring system.参与基于网络的药物不良反应监测系统的糖尿病患者的代表性。
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2013 Mar;22(3):250-5. doi: 10.1002/pds.3341. Epub 2012 Aug 30.
2
Non-response in a pharmacy and patient-based intensive monitoring system: a quantitative study on non-response bias and reasons for non-response.药房及患者密集监测系统中的无应答情况:关于无应答偏倚及无应答原因的定量研究
Int J Pharm Pract. 2014 Apr;22(2):159-62. doi: 10.1111/ijpp.12038. Epub 2013 May 20.
3
Hypoglycaemia is more frequent in type 2 diabetic patients with co-morbid vascular disease: an analysis of the DiaRegis registry.合并血管疾病的 2 型糖尿病患者更常发生低血糖:DiaRegis 注册研究分析。
Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2012 Aug;19(4):765-72. doi: 10.1177/1741826711411104. Epub 2011 May 31.
4
Clinical relevance of drug-drug interactions in hospitalized dermatology patients.住院皮肤科患者药物-药物相互作用的临床相关性。
Adv Clin Exp Med. 2013 Jul-Aug;22(4):555-63.
5
Longitudinal monitoring of the safety of drugs by using a web-based system: the case of pregabalin.利用基于网络的系统对药物安全性进行纵向监测:普瑞巴林案例。
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2011 Jun;20(6):591-7. doi: 10.1002/pds.2135.
6
Patients' motives for participating in active post-marketing surveillance.患者参与主动上市后监测的动机。
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2013 Jan;22(1):70-6. doi: 10.1002/pds.3327. Epub 2012 Jul 27.
7
Discrepancies in reported drug use in geriatric outpatients: relevance to adverse events and drug-drug interactions.老年门诊患者报告的药物使用差异:与不良事件和药物相互作用的相关性。
Am J Geriatr Pharmacother. 2009 Apr;7(2):93-104. doi: 10.1016/j.amjopharm.2009.04.006.
8
Adherence with pharmacotherapy for type 2 diabetes: a retrospective cohort study of adults with employer-sponsored health insurance.2型糖尿病药物治疗的依从性:一项针对有雇主提供医疗保险的成年人的回顾性队列研究。
Clin Ther. 2005 Jul;27(7):1064-73. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2005.07.009.
9
Web-based intensive monitoring: from passive to active drug surveillance.基于网络的强化监测:从被动到主动药物监测。
Expert Opin Drug Saf. 2012 Jan;11(1):45-51. doi: 10.1517/14740338.2012.629184. Epub 2011 Oct 18.
10
Parametric time-to-onset models were developed to improve causality assessment of adverse drug reactions from antidiabetic drugs.建立了参数化发病时间模型,以提高抗糖尿病药物不良反应因果关系评估的准确性。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2015 Dec;68(12):1423-31. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2015.03.001. Epub 2015 Mar 9.

引用本文的文献

1
Sex Differences in Adverse Drug Reactions of Metformin: A Longitudinal Survey Study.二甲双胍不良反应的性别差异:一项纵向调查研究。
Drug Saf. 2020 May;43(5):489-495. doi: 10.1007/s40264-020-00913-8.
2
Intensive Monitoring Studies for Assessing Medicines: A Systematic Review.用于评估药物的强化监测研究:一项系统评价
Front Med (Lausanne). 2019 Jul 19;6:147. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2019.00147. eCollection 2019.
3
Adverse drug event patterns experienced by patients with diabetes: A diary study in primary care.糖尿病患者经历的药物不良事件模式:一项初级保健中的日记研究。
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2019 Sep;28(9):1175-1179. doi: 10.1002/pds.4839. Epub 2019 Jun 17.
4
The value of patient reporting to the pharmacovigilance system: a systematic review.患者向药物警戒系统报告的价值:一项系统评价
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2017 Feb;83(2):227-246. doi: 10.1111/bcp.13098. Epub 2016 Oct 12.
5
Patient Participation and the Use of Ehealth Tools for Pharmacoviligance.患者参与及电子健康工具在药物警戒中的应用
Front Pharmacol. 2016 Apr 11;7:90. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2016.00090. eCollection 2016.
6
Construct and concurrent validity of a patient-reported adverse drug event questionnaire: a cross-sectional study.患者报告的药物不良事件问卷的结构效度和同时效度:一项横断面研究。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2014 Aug 13;12:103. doi: 10.1186/s12955-014-0103-6.