• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

个性化遗传风险咨询以促进糖尿病预防:一项随机试验。

Personalized genetic risk counseling to motivate diabetes prevention: a randomized trial.

机构信息

Division of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, CA, USA.

出版信息

Diabetes Care. 2013 Jan;36(1):13-9. doi: 10.2337/dc12-0884. Epub 2012 Aug 28.

DOI:10.2337/dc12-0884
PMID:22933432
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3526219/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To examine whether diabetes genetic risk testing and counseling can improve diabetes prevention behaviors.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

We conducted a randomized trial of diabetes genetic risk counseling among overweight patients at increased phenotypic risk for type 2 diabetes. Participants were randomly allocated to genetic testing versus no testing. Genetic risk was calculated by summing 36 single nucleotide polymorphisms associated with type 2 diabetes. Participants in the top and bottom score quartiles received individual genetic counseling before being enrolled with untested control participants in a 12-week, validated, diabetes prevention program. Middle-risk quartile participants were not studied further. We examined the effect of this genetic counseling intervention on patient self-reported attitudes, program attendance, and weight loss, separately comparing higher-risk and lower-risk result recipients with control participants.

RESULTS

The 108 participants enrolled in the diabetes prevention program included 42 participants at higher diabetes genetic risk, 32 at lower diabetes genetic risk, and 34 untested control subjects. Mean age was 57.9 ± 10.6 years, 61% were men, and average BMI was 34.8 kg/m(2), with no differences among randomization groups. Participants attended 6.8 ± 4.3 group sessions and lost 8.5 ± 10.1 pounds, with 33 of 108 (30.6%) losing ≥5% body weight. There were few statistically significant differences in self-reported motivation, program attendance, or mean weight loss when higher-risk recipients and lower-risk recipients were compared with control subjects (P > 0.05 for all but one comparison).

CONCLUSIONS

Diabetes genetic risk counseling with currently available variants does not significantly alter self-reported motivation or prevention program adherence for overweight individuals at risk for diabetes.

摘要

目的

研究糖尿病遗传风险检测和咨询是否能改善糖尿病预防行为。

研究设计和方法

我们对超重且有 2 型糖尿病表型高风险的患者进行了糖尿病遗传风险咨询的随机试验。参与者被随机分配接受基因检测或不接受检测。遗传风险通过累加与 2 型糖尿病相关的 36 个单核苷酸多态性来计算。在参加为期 12 周、经验证的糖尿病预防计划之前,处于最高和最低得分四分位的参与者接受了个体遗传咨询,而未接受测试的对照组参与者则与处于中间风险四分位的参与者一起参加。我们分别比较了高风险和低风险结果接受者与对照组参与者,研究了这种遗传咨询干预对患者自我报告的态度、计划参与度和体重减轻的影响。

结果

参加糖尿病预防计划的 108 名参与者包括 42 名糖尿病遗传风险较高的参与者、32 名糖尿病遗传风险较低的参与者和 34 名未接受测试的对照组参与者。平均年龄为 57.9 ± 10.6 岁,61%为男性,平均 BMI 为 34.8kg/m²,随机分组之间无差异。参与者参加了 6.8 ± 4.3 次小组会议,体重减轻了 8.5 ± 10.1 磅,108 人中的 33 人(30.6%)体重减轻了≥5%。当高风险接受者和低风险接受者与对照组比较时,自我报告的动机、计划参与度或平均体重减轻率差异不大(除了一次比较外,所有比较 P>0.05)。

结论

目前可用的变异体进行糖尿病遗传风险咨询并不能显著改变超重且有糖尿病风险个体的自我报告动机或预防计划依从性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/44cc/3526219/2ff0af64b248/13fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/44cc/3526219/2ff0af64b248/13fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/44cc/3526219/2ff0af64b248/13fig1.jpg

相似文献

1
Personalized genetic risk counseling to motivate diabetes prevention: a randomized trial.个性化遗传风险咨询以促进糖尿病预防:一项随机试验。
Diabetes Care. 2013 Jan;36(1):13-9. doi: 10.2337/dc12-0884. Epub 2012 Aug 28.
2
Design of a randomized trial of diabetes genetic risk testing to motivate behavior change: the Genetic Counseling/lifestyle Change (GC/LC) Study for Diabetes Prevention.糖尿病遗传风险检测以促进行为改变的随机试验设计:预防糖尿病的遗传咨询/生活方式改变(GC/LC)研究。
Clin Trials. 2011 Oct;8(5):609-15. doi: 10.1177/1740774511414159.
3
Does Type 2 Diabetes Genetic Testing and Counseling Reduce Modifiable Risk Factors? A Randomized Controlled Trial of Veterans.2型糖尿病基因检测与咨询能否降低可改变的风险因素?一项针对退伍军人的随机对照试验。
J Gen Intern Med. 2015 Nov;30(11):1591-8. doi: 10.1007/s11606-015-3315-5. Epub 2015 Apr 16.
4
Genetic counseling as a tool for type 2 diabetes prevention: a genetic counseling framework for common polygenetic disorders.遗传咨询作为2型糖尿病预防的工具:常见多基因疾病的遗传咨询框架
J Genet Couns. 2012 Oct;21(5):684-91. doi: 10.1007/s10897-012-9486-x.
5
Examining the impact of genetic testing for type 2 diabetes on health behaviors: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.探讨 2 型糖尿病基因检测对健康行为的影响:一项随机对照试验的研究方案。
Trials. 2012 Aug 1;13:121. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-13-121.
6
DiAlert: a prevention program for overweight first degree relatives of type 2 diabetes patients: results of a pilot study to test feasibility and acceptability.DiAlert:2 型糖尿病患者超重一级亲属的预防计划:测试可行性和可接受性的试点研究结果。
Trials. 2012 Sep 27;13:178. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-13-178.
7
Diabetes risk reduction in overweight first degree relatives of type 2 diabetes patients: effects of a low-intensive lifestyle education program (DiAlert) A randomized controlled trial.2型糖尿病患者超重一级亲属的糖尿病风险降低:低强度生活方式教育项目(DiAlert)的效果 一项随机对照试验
Patient Educ Couns. 2015 Apr;98(4):476-83. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2014.12.008. Epub 2015 Jan 3.
8
9
Impact of literacy and numeracy on motivation for behavior change after diabetes genetic risk testing.文化程度和计算能力对糖尿病遗传风险检测后行为改变动机的影响。
Med Decis Making. 2012 Jul-Aug;32(4):606-15. doi: 10.1177/0272989X11431608. Epub 2012 Jan 12.
10
Effect of genetic testing for risk of type 2 diabetes mellitus on health behaviors and outcomes: study rationale, development and design.2 型糖尿病风险基因检测对健康行为和结果的影响:研究背景、方法和设计。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2012 Jan 18;12:16. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-12-16.

引用本文的文献

1
The Role of Polygenic Risk Score in the General Population: Current Status and Future Prospects.多基因风险评分在普通人群中的作用:现状与未来展望
J Atheroscler Thromb. 2025 Sep 1;32(9):1079-1097. doi: 10.5551/jat.RV22039. Epub 2025 Jul 4.
2
Gene-Diet Interactions in Diabetes Mellitus: Current Insights and the Potential of Personalized Nutrition.糖尿病中的基因-饮食相互作用:当前见解与个性化营养的潜力
Genes (Basel). 2025 May 14;16(5):578. doi: 10.3390/genes16050578.
3
Effect of communicating genetic risk of type 2 diabetes and wearable technologies on wearable device-measured behavioural outcomes in East Asians: protocol of a randomised controlled trial.

本文引用的文献

1
Genetic counseling as a tool for type 2 diabetes prevention: a genetic counseling framework for common polygenetic disorders.遗传咨询作为2型糖尿病预防的工具:常见多基因疾病的遗传咨询框架
J Genet Couns. 2012 Oct;21(5):684-91. doi: 10.1007/s10897-012-9486-x.
2
Design of a randomized trial of diabetes genetic risk testing to motivate behavior change: the Genetic Counseling/lifestyle Change (GC/LC) Study for Diabetes Prevention.糖尿病遗传风险检测以促进行为改变的随机试验设计:预防糖尿病的遗传咨询/生活方式改变(GC/LC)研究。
Clin Trials. 2011 Oct;8(5):609-15. doi: 10.1177/1740774511414159.
3
Genomics and drug response.
2型糖尿病遗传风险沟通及可穿戴技术对东亚人可穿戴设备测量行为结果的影响:一项随机对照试验方案
BMJ Open. 2024 Dec 4;14(12):e082635. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-082635.
4
Promise and Peril of a Genotype-First Approach to Mendelian Cardiovascular Disease.基因型优先策略在孟德尔心血管疾病诊治中的机遇与挑战。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2024 Nov 5;13(21):e033557. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.123.033557. Epub 2024 Oct 18.
5
Genotype-based precision nutrition strategies for the prediction and clinical management of type 2 diabetes mellitus.基于基因型的精准营养策略在2型糖尿病预测与临床管理中的应用
World J Diabetes. 2024 Feb 15;15(2):142-153. doi: 10.4239/wjd.v15.i2.142.
6
Perspectives on genetic studies of type 2 diabetes from the genome-wide association studies era to precision medicine.从全基因组关联研究时代到精准医学看 2 型糖尿病的遗传学研究。
J Diabetes Investig. 2024 Apr;15(4):410-422. doi: 10.1111/jdi.14149. Epub 2024 Jan 23.
7
Perception of inherited risk in type 2 diabetes: a systematic review.2型糖尿病遗传风险认知:一项系统综述
Front Public Health. 2023 Dec 14;11:1293874. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1293874. eCollection 2023.
8
Returning Genetic Information About Risk for Alcohol Use Disorder to Adolescents: Findings of a Preliminary Qualitative Study of Precision Prevention.向青少年反馈酒精使用障碍风险的遗传信息:精准预防的初步定性研究结果
AJPM Focus. 2023 Oct 1;3(1):100153. doi: 10.1016/j.focus.2023.100153. eCollection 2024 Feb.
9
The GenoVA study: Equitable implementation of a pragmatic randomized trial of polygenic-risk scoring in primary care.GenoVA 研究:在初级保健中公平实施多基因风险评分的实用随机试验。
Am J Hum Genet. 2023 Nov 2;110(11):1841-1852. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2023.10.001.
10
Unveiling Diabetes: Categories, Genetics, Diagnostics, Treatments, and Future Horizons.揭示糖尿病:分类、遗传学、诊断、治疗和未来前景。
Curr Diabetes Rev. 2024;20(4):e180823219972. doi: 10.2174/1573399820666230818092958.
基因组学与药物反应。
N Engl J Med. 2011 Mar 24;364(12):1144-53. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra1010600.
4
Updated genetic score based on 34 confirmed type 2 diabetes Loci is associated with diabetes incidence and regression to normoglycemia in the diabetes prevention program.基于 34 个已确认的 2 型糖尿病基因座的更新遗传评分与糖尿病预防计划中的糖尿病发病率和血糖正常化的逆转相关。
Diabetes. 2011 Apr;60(4):1340-8. doi: 10.2337/db10-1119. Epub 2011 Mar 4.
5
Genomics. Deflating the genomic bubble.基因组学。戳破基因组泡沫。
Science. 2011 Feb 18;331(6019):861-2. doi: 10.1126/science.1198039.
6
Perceived impact of diabetes genetic risk testing among patients at high phenotypic risk for type 2 diabetes.2 型糖尿病表型高危患者对糖尿病遗传风险检测的感知影响。
Diabetes Care. 2011 Mar;34(3):568-73. doi: 10.2337/dc10-1960. Epub 2011 Feb 1.
7
Effect of direct-to-consumer genomewide profiling to assess disease risk.直接面向消费者的全基因组分析评估疾病风险的效果。
N Engl J Med. 2011 Feb 10;364(6):524-34. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1011893. Epub 2011 Jan 12.
8
Effects of communicating DNA-based disease risk estimates on risk-reducing behaviours.传达基于DNA的疾病风险评估对降低风险行为的影响。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010 Oct 6(10):CD007275. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007275.pub2.
9
Genetic risk reclassification for type 2 diabetes by age below or above 50 years using 40 type 2 diabetes risk single nucleotide polymorphisms.使用 40 个 2 型糖尿病风险单核苷酸多态性对年龄低于或高于 50 岁的 2 型糖尿病进行遗传风险重新分类。
Diabetes Care. 2011 Jan;34(1):121-5. doi: 10.2337/dc10-1265. Epub 2010 Oct 1.
10
The path to personalized medicine.个性化医疗之路。
N Engl J Med. 2010 Jul 22;363(4):301-4. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1006304. Epub 2010 Jun 15.