General Medicine Division, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Diabetes Care. 2011 Jan;34(1):121-5. doi: 10.2337/dc10-1265. Epub 2010 Oct 1.
To test if knowledge of type 2 diabetes genetic variants improves disease prediction.
We tested 40 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) associated with diabetes in 3,471 Framingham Offspring Study subjects followed over 34 years using pooled logistic regression models stratified by age (<50 years, diabetes cases = 144; or ≥50 years, diabetes cases = 302). Models included clinical risk factors and a 40-SNP weighted genetic risk score.
In people <50 years of age, the clinical risk factors model C-statistic was 0.908; the 40-SNP score increased it to 0.911 (P = 0.3; net reclassification improvement (NRI): 10.2%, P = 0.001). In people ≥50 years of age, the C-statistics without and with the score were 0.883 and 0.884 (P = 0.2; NRI: 0.4%). The risk per risk allele was higher in people <50 than ≥50 years of age (24 vs. 11%; P value for age interaction = 0.02).
Knowledge of common genetic variation appropriately reclassifies younger people for type 2 diabetes risk beyond clinical risk factors but not older people.
检验 2 型糖尿病遗传变异知识是否能提高疾病预测能力。
我们在 34 年的随访中,使用基于年龄(<50 岁,糖尿病病例=144;或≥50 岁,糖尿病病例=302)的汇总逻辑回归模型,对 3471 名弗雷明汉后代研究对象进行了 40 个与糖尿病相关的单核苷酸多态性(SNP)检测。模型包括临床危险因素和 40-SNP 加权遗传风险评分。
在年龄<50 岁的人群中,临床危险因素模型的 C 统计量为 0.908;40-SNP 评分将其提高至 0.911(P=0.3;净重新分类改善(NRI):10.2%,P=0.001)。在年龄≥50 岁的人群中,无评分和有评分的 C 统计量分别为 0.883 和 0.884(P=0.2;NRI:0.4%)。年龄<50 岁的人群中,每个风险等位基因的风险高于年龄≥50 岁的人群(24%比 11%;年龄交互作用的 P 值=0.02)。
常见遗传变异知识适当将年轻人的 2 型糖尿病风险重新分类,超出了临床危险因素,但对老年人则不然。