Suppr超能文献

每日一次在任意一餐中给予德谷胰岛素/门冬胰岛素,其他餐次给予门冬胰岛素,与 1 型糖尿病患者的标准基础-餐时胰岛素方案相比:一项 26 周、3 期、随机、开放标签、以目标为导向的试验。

Insulin degludec/insulin aspart administered once daily at any meal, with insulin aspart at other meals versus a standard basal-bolus regimen in patients with type 1 diabetes: a 26-week, phase 3, randomized, open-label, treat-to-target trial.

机构信息

University of Washington Medical Center-Roosevelt, Seattle, WA, USA.

出版信息

Diabetes Care. 2012 Nov;35(11):2174-81. doi: 10.2337/dc11-2503. Epub 2012 Aug 28.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate efficacy and tolerability of a co-formulation of insulin degludec and insulin aspart (IDegAsp) with insulin aspart (IAsp) at other meals compared with basal-bolus therapy using insulin detemir (IDet) and IAsp.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

Adults (n = 548) with type 1 diabetes (A1C 7.0-10.0%; BMI ≤35.0 kg/m(2)) were randomized 2:1 in a 26-week, multinational, parallel-group, treat-to-target trial to IDegAsp or IDet. IDegAsp was given with a meal, and IDet was given in the evening, with a second (breakfast) dose added if needed.

RESULTS

Non-inferiority for IDegAsp versus IDet was confirmed; A1C improved by 0.75% with IDegAsp and 0.70% with IDet to 7.6% in both groups (estimated treatment difference IDegAsp - IDet: -0.05% [95% CI -0.18 to 0.08]). There was no statistically significant difference between IDegAsp and IDet in the rates of severe hypoglycemia (0.33 and 0.42 episodes/patient-year, respectively) or overall confirmed (plasma glucose <3.1 mmol/L) hypoglycemia (39.17 and 44.34 episodes/patient-year, respectively). Nocturnal confirmed hypoglycemia rate was 37% lower with IDegAsp than IDet (3.71 vs. 5.72 episodes/patient-year, P < 0.05). Weight gain was 2.3 and 1.3 kg with IDegAsp and IDet, respectively (P < 0.05). Total insulin dose was 13% lower in the IDegAsp group (P < 0.0001). No treatment differences were detected in Health-Related Quality of Life, laboratory measurements, physical examination, vital signs, electrocardiograms, fundoscopy, or adverse events.

CONCLUSIONS

IDegAsp in basal-bolus therapy with IAsp at additional mealtimes improves overall glycemic control and was non-inferior to IDet, with a reduced risk of nocturnal hypoglycemia and fewer injections in comparison with IDet + IAsp basal-bolus therapy.

摘要

目的

评估德谷胰岛素和门冬胰岛素复方制剂(IDegAsp)与门冬胰岛素(IAsp)联用与地特胰岛素(IDet)和 IAsp 联合基础-餐时胰岛素方案相比,在其他各餐时的疗效和安全性。

研究设计和方法

548 例 1 型糖尿病患者(糖化血红蛋白 [A1C] 7.0-10.0%,体重指数 [BMI] ≤35.0 kg/m²)按 2:1 随机分组,进入为期 26 周的多国、平行分组、以目标为导向的试验,分别接受 IDegAsp 或 IDet 治疗。IDegAsp 随餐给药,IDet 晚间给药,如果需要,早餐时再加用一次(第二剂)。

结果

IDegAsp 与 IDet 相比非劣效,两组患者的 A1C 分别从基线的 7.6%改善 0.75%和 0.70%(IDegAsp 和 IDet 组估计治疗差值:-0.05% [95%CI -0.18 至 0.08])。IDegAsp 与 IDet 组严重低血糖(分别为 0.33 和 0.42 例次/患者年)和总体确诊(血糖<3.1 mmol/L)低血糖(分别为 39.17 和 44.34 例次/患者年)发生率无统计学差异。IDegAsp 组夜间确诊低血糖发生率较 IDet 组低 37%(3.71 比 5.72 例次/患者年,P<0.05)。IDegAsp 和 IDet 组体重分别增加 2.3 和 1.3 kg(P<0.05)。IDegAsp 组胰岛素总剂量较 IDet 组低 13%(P<0.0001)。健康相关生活质量、实验室检查、体格检查、生命体征、心电图、眼底检查或不良事件方面无治疗差异。

结论

在 IAsp 基础上添加餐时胰岛素治疗中应用 IDegAsp 可改善总体血糖控制,与 IDet 相比非劣效,且低血糖风险更低,与 IDet + IAsp 基础-餐时胰岛素方案相比注射次数更少。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e139/3476910/e464c1eee6a4/2174fig1.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验