• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

注意缺失消除双眼竞争:知觉证据。

Inattention abolishes binocular rivalry: perceptual evidence.

机构信息

Vanderbilt Vision Research Center, Vanderbilt University.

出版信息

Psychol Sci. 2012 Oct 1;23(10):1159-67. doi: 10.1177/0956797612440100. Epub 2012 Aug 28.

DOI:10.1177/0956797612440100
PMID:22933458
Abstract

Binocular rivalry refers to the unstable perceptual experience that arises when an observer views a different image with each eye: Each image reaches awareness in turn as the other becomes temporarily invisible. Using a novel experimental paradigm, we provide the first direct, perceptual evidence that binocular rivalry occurs only in the presence of attention. Observers in our experiment withdrew attention from a binocular rivalry stimulus shortly after one of the eyes' images was forced to visibility. Seconds later, they shifted attention back to the stimulus to report their perception. For all observers, reported perception strongly and significantly deviated from the results that would be expected if binocular rivalry continued during inattention. Strikingly, reports instead exactly matched those obtained when the stimulus was physically removed for seconds rather than left unattended. These results show that disregarding a binocular rivalry stimulus is equivalent to having it removed from view. Thus, inattention abolishes binocular rivalry.

摘要

双眼竞争是指当观察者用每只眼睛观看不同的图像时所产生的不稳定的知觉体验

当另一个图像暂时不可见时,每个图像轮流到达意识。使用一种新颖的实验范式,我们提供了第一个直接的、知觉上的证据,表明双眼竞争仅在注意力存在的情况下发生。在我们的实验中,观察者在一只眼睛的图像被强制可见后不久就将注意力从双眼竞争刺激物上撤回。几秒钟后,他们将注意力转移回刺激物,报告他们的感知。对于所有观察者,报告的感知与如果在注意力不集中期间双眼竞争继续进行时所预期的结果强烈而显著地偏离。引人注目的是,报告的结果与将刺激物物理移除几秒钟而不是不关注时得到的结果完全匹配。这些结果表明,忽略双眼竞争刺激物相当于将其从视线中移除。因此,注意力不集中会消除双眼竞争。

相似文献

1
Inattention abolishes binocular rivalry: perceptual evidence.注意缺失消除双眼竞争:知觉证据。
Psychol Sci. 2012 Oct 1;23(10):1159-67. doi: 10.1177/0956797612440100. Epub 2012 Aug 28.
2
Which image is in awareness during binocular rivalry? Reading perceptual status from eye movements.在双眼竞争过程中,哪个图像处于意识层面?从眼动读取感知状态。
J Vis. 2012 Mar 6;12(3):5. doi: 10.1167/12.3.5.
3
Monocular rivalry exhibits three hallmarks of binocular rivalry: evidence for common processes.单眼竞争呈现出双眼竞争的三个特征:共同过程的证据。
Vision Res. 2009 Mar;49(7):671-81. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2009.01.020. Epub 2009 Feb 20.
4
Removal of monocular interactions equates rivalry behavior for monocular, binocular, and stimulus rivalries.消除单眼相互作用等同于单眼、双眼和刺激竞争中的竞争行为。
J Vis. 2008 Nov 24;8(15):13.1-17. doi: 10.1167/8.15.13.
5
Competing global representations fail to initiate binocular rivalry.相互竞争的全局表征无法引发双眼竞争。
Neuron. 2004 Sep 16;43(6):907-14. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2004.08.039.
6
Inter-ocular transfer of stimulus cueing in dominance selection at the onset of binocular rivalry.双眼竞争开始时优势选择中刺激线索的眼间转移。
Vision Res. 2007 Apr;47(9):1142-4. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2007.01.016. Epub 2007 Mar 13.
7
Early correlates of visual awareness following orientation and colour rivalry.方向和颜色竞争后视觉意识的早期相关因素
Vision Res. 2008 Oct;48(22):2359-69. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2008.07.024.
8
Object-based attention determines dominance in binocular rivalry.基于客体的注意决定双眼竞争中的优势。
Nature. 2004 May 27;429(6990):410-3. doi: 10.1038/nature02584.
9
Retinotopic and non-retinotopic stimulus encoding in binocular rivalry and the involvement of feedback.双眼竞争中的视网膜拓扑和非视网膜拓扑刺激编码以及反馈的参与
J Vis. 2008 May 30;8(5):17.1-10. doi: 10.1167/8.5.17.
10
Binocular rivalry and visual awareness: the role of attention.双眼竞争与视觉意识:注意力的作用。
Perception. 1999;28(5):551-74. doi: 10.1068/p2923.

引用本文的文献

1
An anti-Hebbian model for binocular visual plasticity and its attentional modulation.一种用于双眼视觉可塑性及其注意力调制的反赫布模型。
Commun Biol. 2025 Mar 12;8(1):418. doi: 10.1038/s42003-025-07833-2.
2
Perceptual Resolution of Ambiguity: Can Tuned, Divisive Normalization Account for both Interocular Similarity Grouping and Difference Enhancement.模糊性的感知分辨率:调整后的分裂归一化能否解释双眼相似性分组和差异增强?
bioRxiv. 2024 Jun 26:2024.04.01.587646. doi: 10.1101/2024.04.01.587646.
3
Binocular rivalry under naturalistic geometry: Evidence from worlds simulated in virtual reality.
自然主义几何学下的双眼竞争:来自虚拟现实模拟世界的证据。
PNAS Nexus. 2024 Feb 6;3(2):pgae054. doi: 10.1093/pnasnexus/pgae054. eCollection 2024 Feb.
4
Does V1 response suppression initiate binocular rivalry?V1反应抑制会引发双眼竞争吗?
iScience. 2023 Jul 8;26(8):107359. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2023.107359. eCollection 2023 Aug 18.
5
No effect of attentional modulation by spatial cueing in a masked numerical priming paradigm using continuous flash suppression (CFS).在使用连续闪光抑制(CFS)的掩蔽数字启动范式中,空间线索对注意的调节没有影响。
PeerJ. 2023 Jan 6;11:e14607. doi: 10.7717/peerj.14607. eCollection 2023.
6
Does Location Uncertainty Modulate Unconscious Processing Under Continuous Flash Suppression?在持续闪光抑制下,位置不确定性是否会调节无意识加工?
Adv Cogn Psychol. 2021 Apr 6;17(1):3-14. doi: 10.5709/acp-0312-3. eCollection 2021.
7
The Certainty of Ambiguity in Visual Neural Representations.视觉神经表象的模糊性之确定性。
Annu Rev Vis Sci. 2021 Sep 15;7:465-486. doi: 10.1146/annurev-vision-100419-125929.
8
Shifting eye balance using monocularly directed attention in normal vision.在正常视力中使用单眼定向注意力来改变眼平衡。
J Vis. 2021 May 3;21(5):4. doi: 10.1167/jov.21.5.4.
9
The SSVEP tracks attention, not consciousness, during perceptual filling-in.在感知填补期间,SSVEP 追踪的是注意力,而不是意识。
Elife. 2020 Nov 10;9:e60031. doi: 10.7554/eLife.60031.
10
A new experimental phenomenological method to explore the subjective features of psychological phenomena: its application to binocular rivalry.一种探索心理现象主观特征的新实验现象学方法:其在双眼竞争中的应用。
Neurosci Conscious. 2020 Oct 3;2020(1):niaa018. doi: 10.1093/nc/niaa018. eCollection 2020.