Benthien Fenja Mareike, Hesselmann Guido
Psychologische Hochschule Berlin (PHB), 10179 Berlin, Germany1.
Adv Cogn Psychol. 2021 Apr 6;17(1):3-14. doi: 10.5709/acp-0312-3. eCollection 2021.
Previous research suggests that selective spatial attention is a determining factor for unconscious processing under continuous flash suppression (CFS), and specifically, that inattention toward stimulus location facilitates its unconscious processing by reducing the depth of CFS (Eo et al., 2016). The aim of our study was to further examine this modulation-by-attention model of CFS using a number priming paradigm. Participants ( = 26) performed a number comparison task on a visible target number ("compare target to five"). Prime-target pairs were either congruent (both smaller or larger than five) or incongruent. Spatial attention toward the primes was varied by manipulating the uncertainty of the primes' location. Based on the modulation-by-attention model, we hypothesized the following: In trials with uncertain prime location, RTs for congruent prime-target pairs should be faster than for incongruent ones. In trials with certain prime location, RTs for congruent versus incongruent prime-target pairs should not differ. We analyzed our data with sequential Bayes factors (BFs). Our data showed no effect of location uncertainty on unconscious priming under CFS (BF0+ = 5.16). However, even visible primes only weakly influenced RTs. Possible reasons for the absence of robust number priming effects in our study are discussed. Based on exploratory analyses, we conclude that the numerical order of prime and target resulted in a response conflict and interfered with the predicted priming effect.
先前的研究表明,选择性空间注意是连续闪光抑制(CFS)下无意识加工的一个决定性因素,具体而言,对刺激位置的不注意通过降低CFS的深度促进其无意识加工(Eo等人,2016)。我们研究的目的是使用数字启动范式进一步检验这种CFS的注意调节模型。参与者(n = 26)对一个可见的目标数字执行数字比较任务(“将目标与5比较”)。启动-目标对要么是一致的(都小于或大于5),要么是不一致的。通过操纵启动项位置的不确定性来改变对启动项的空间注意。基于注意调节模型,我们做出了以下假设:在启动项位置不确定的试验中,一致的启动-目标对的反应时应该比对不一致的启动-目标对的反应时更快。在启动项位置确定的试验中,一致的与不一致启动-目标对的反应时应该没有差异。我们用顺序贝叶斯因子(BFs)分析了我们的数据。我们的数据显示,位置不确定性对CFS下的无意识启动没有影响(BF0+ = 5.16)。然而,即使是可见的启动项对反应时的影响也很微弱。我们讨论了本研究中缺乏强大数字启动效应的可能原因。基于探索性分析,我们得出结论,启动项和目标的数字顺序导致了反应冲突,并干扰了预测的启动效应。