• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

用于健康状况评估的死因统计:国家和国际经验。

The use of cause-of-death statistics for health situation assessment: national and international experiences.

作者信息

Ruzicka L T, Lopez A D

机构信息

Department of Demography, Australian National University, Canberra.

出版信息

World Health Stat Q. 1990;43(4):249-58.

PMID:2293493
Abstract

About 80 countries or areas regularly report detailed cause-of-death data to WHO based on the International Statistical Classification of Diseases, Injuries, and Causes of Death (ICD). These data refer to about 35% of all deaths estimated to occur in the world, although the actual coverage may be somewhat higher due to the representativeness of data-collection schemes in countries such as China. These data are systematically validated and documented by WHO before their dissemination, principally through publication in the World health statistics annual. This article describes the collection and use of these data by WHO for assessing the global and regional health situation, and for monitoring trends in health status. In addition, several issues in the use of mortality data and the ICD for national health situation assessment are discussed, including the need for documenting the quality and coverage of cause-of-death statistics, identifying biases and evaluating mortality trends.

摘要

约80个国家或地区定期根据《国际疾病、损伤和死因统计分类》(ICD)向世卫组织报告详细的死因数据。这些数据约占全球估计死亡总数的35%,不过由于中国等国数据收集方案具有代表性,实际覆盖范围可能略高。在世卫组织传播这些数据之前,主要通过《世界卫生统计年鉴》发表,这些数据会得到系统验证和记录。本文介绍了世卫组织如何收集和使用这些数据来评估全球和区域卫生状况,以及监测健康状况趋势。此外,还讨论了使用死亡率数据和ICD评估国家卫生状况时的若干问题,包括记录死因统计数据的质量和覆盖范围、识别偏差以及评估死亡率趋势的必要性。

相似文献

1
The use of cause-of-death statistics for health situation assessment: national and international experiences.用于健康状况评估的死因统计:国家和国际经验。
World Health Stat Q. 1990;43(4):249-58.
2
[Maternal mortality in Central America. The basis for national programs on epidemiologic surveillance].[中美洲的孕产妇死亡率。国家流行病学监测计划的基础]
Rev Latinoam Perinatol. 1989;9(4):167-77.
3
Deaths: injuries, 2002.死亡:伤害,2002年。
Natl Vital Stat Rep. 2006 Jan 31;54(10):1-124.
4
Disease classification: measuring the effect of the Tenth Revision of the International Classification of Diseases on cause-of-death data in the United States.疾病分类:衡量《国际疾病分类第十次修订本》对美国死因数据的影响
Stat Med. 2003 May 15;22(9):1551-70. doi: 10.1002/sim.1511.
5
Deaths: injuries, 2001.死亡:伤害,2001年。
Natl Vital Stat Rep. 2004 Jun 2;52(21):1-86.
6
Mortality data from the National Vital Statistics System.来自国家生命统计系统的死亡率数据。
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 1989 Mar 3;38(8):118-23.
7
[Quality of suicide mortality data].[自杀死亡率数据的质量]
Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique. 2002 Jan;50(1):49-62.
8
Validation of cause-of-death statistics in urban China.中国城市死因统计的验证
Int J Epidemiol. 2007 Jun;36(3):642-51. doi: 10.1093/ije/dym003. Epub 2007 Feb 28.
9
Improvement of the quality and comparability of causes-of-death statistics inside the European Community. EUROSTAT Task Force on "causes of death statistics".提高欧共体内死因统计数据的质量和可比性。欧盟统计局“死因统计”特别工作组。
Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique. 1998 Dec;46(6):447-56.
10
Deaths: final data for 2002.死亡人数:2002年最终数据。
Natl Vital Stat Rep. 2004 Oct 12;53(5):1-115.

引用本文的文献

1
Demographic Differences in Mortality in the District of Columbia.哥伦比亚特区死亡率的人口统计学差异
JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Mar 3;8(3):e252290. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.2290.
2
Cost Evaluation of Minimally Invasive Tissue Sampling (MITS) Implementation in Low- and Middle-Income Countries.微创组织取样(MITS)在中低收入国家实施的成本评估。
Clin Infect Dis. 2021 Dec 15;73(Suppl_5):S401-S407. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciab828.
3
Public health utility of cause of death data: applying empirical algorithms to improve data quality.
死因数据的公共卫生效用:应用经验算法改善数据质量。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2021 Jun 2;21(1):175. doi: 10.1186/s12911-021-01501-1.
4
BAYESIAN FACTOR MODELS FOR PROBABILISTIC CAUSE OF DEATH ASSESSMENT WITH VERBAL AUTOPSIES.用于基于文字尸检的概率性死因评估的贝叶斯因子模型
Ann Appl Stat. 2020 Mar;14(1):241-256. doi: 10.1214/19-aoas1253. Epub 2020 Apr 16.
5
The civil registration system is a potentially viable data source for reliable subnational mortality measurement in India.民事登记系统是印度可靠的国家级死亡率测量的潜在可行数据来源。
BMJ Glob Health. 2020 Aug;5(8). doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2020-002586.
6
Improving medical certification of cause of death: effective strategies and approaches based on experiences from the Data for Health Initiative.提高死亡原因医学证明的质量:基于“健康数据倡议”经验的有效策略和方法。
BMC Med. 2020 Mar 9;18(1):74. doi: 10.1186/s12916-020-01519-8.
7
Evaluating the quality of evidence for diagnosing ischemic heart disease from verbal autopsy in Indonesia.评估印度尼西亚通过死因推断诊断缺血性心脏病的证据质量。
World J Cardiol. 2019 Oct 26;11(10):244-255. doi: 10.4330/wjc.v11.i10.244.
8
Comparing tariff and medical assistant assigned causes of death from verbal autopsy interviews in Matlab, Bangladesh: implications for a health and demographic surveillance system.比较孟加拉国马特莱地区通过口头尸检访谈得出的关税和医疗助理认定的死亡原因:对健康和人口监测系统的影响。
Popul Health Metr. 2018 Jun 27;16(1):10. doi: 10.1186/s12963-018-0169-1.
9
Suicide rates in China, 2004-2014: comparing data from two sample-based mortality surveillance systems.中国 2004-2014 年的自杀率:基于两种基于样本的死亡率监测系统的数据比较。
BMC Public Health. 2018 Feb 13;18(1):239. doi: 10.1186/s12889-018-5161-y.
10
Evaluation of data sources and approaches for estimation of influenza-associated mortality in India.评估印度流感相关死亡率估算的数据源和方法。
Influenza Other Respir Viruses. 2018 Jan;12(1):72-80. doi: 10.1111/irv.12493. Epub 2017 Dec 2.