Suppr超能文献

机器人辅助腹腔镜下保留生育功能的根治性宫颈切除术的可重复性和准确性。

Reproducibility and accuracy of robot-assisted laparoscopic fertility sparing radical trachelectomy.

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Skåne University Hospital Lund and Lund University, Lund, Sweden.

出版信息

Gynecol Oncol. 2012 Dec;127(3):484-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2012.08.022. Epub 2012 Aug 28.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To assess the accuracy and reproducibility of robot-assisted laparoscopic abdominal fertility sparing radical trachelectomy in women with early stage cervical cancer.

METHODS

Relevant prospective clinical data from 13 consecutive women planned for robotic radical trachelectomy between 2007 and 2012 were compared with retrospective data from 12 consecutive women planned for vaginal radical trachelectomy between 2000 and 2007. The first follow up on all women included a similar vaginal ultrasonographic measurement of the remaining cervical length and the position of the cerclage, enabling a direct comparison. Peri- and postoperative clinical data were evaluated.

RESULTS

The remaining cervical length was equal between the robotic and vaginal procedures (mean 11 mm, range 8-13 mm; mean 11 mm, range 5-19 mm respectively, p=0.92). The distance from the cerclage to the inner cervical os was significantly shorter and less variable in the robot group (robot mean 2mm, range of 1-4mm, vaginal mean 4mm, range 2-7 mm, p=0.003). Rejection of the cerclage (n=3) and/or cervical stenosis (n=3) was diagnosed in four women, all of whom in the vaginal group, between one and 13 months after surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

Robotic trachelectomy is equally reproducible and accurate as the vaginal trachelectomy in terms of the remaining cervical length and results in a significantly more precise placement of the cerclage.

摘要

目的

评估机器人辅助腹腔镜下腹部保留生育功能的根治性宫颈切除术治疗早期宫颈癌的准确性和可重复性。

方法

将 2007 年至 2012 年间连续 13 例计划行机器人根治性宫颈切除术的患者的相关前瞻性临床资料与 2000 年至 2007 年间连续 12 例计划行阴道根治性宫颈切除术的患者的回顾性资料进行比较。所有女性的首次随访均包括对剩余宫颈长度和环扎位置进行类似的阴道超声测量,以便进行直接比较。评估围手术期和术后的临床数据。

结果

机器人手术和阴道手术的剩余宫颈长度相等(平均 11mm,范围 8-13mm;分别为平均 11mm,范围 5-19mm,p=0.92)。环扎至内宫颈口的距离在机器人组中明显更短且变化更小(机器人组平均 2mm,范围 1-4mm,阴道组平均 4mm,范围 2-7mm,p=0.003)。有 4 名女性(均在阴道组)在手术后 1-13 个月诊断出环扎排斥(n=3)和/或宫颈狭窄(n=3)。

结论

机器人宫颈切除术在剩余宫颈长度和环扎位置方面与阴道宫颈切除术一样具有可重复性和准确性,并且能够更精确地放置环扎。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验