Department of Psychology, Washington State University, 14204 NE Salmon Creek Ave, Vancouver, WA 98686, USA.
J Abnorm Child Psychol. 2013 Feb;41(2):223-37. doi: 10.1007/s10802-012-9674-z.
Strong associations between conduct disorder (CD), antisocial personality disorder (ASPD) and substance use disorders (SUD) seem to reflect a general vulnerability to externalizing behaviors. Recent studies have characterized this vulnerability on a continuous scale, rather than as distinct categories, suggesting that the revision of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5) take into account the underlying continuum of externalizing behaviors. However, most of this research has not included measures of disorders that appear in childhood [e.g., attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) or oppositional defiant disorder (ODD)], nor has it considered the full range of possibilities for the latent structure of externalizing behaviors, particularly factor mixture models, which allow for a latent factor to have both continuous and categorical dimensions. Finally, the majority of prior studies have not tested multidimensional models. Using lifetime diagnoses of externalizing disorders from participants in the Fast Track Project (n = 715), we analyzed a series of latent variable models ranging from fully continuous factor models to fully categorical mixture models. Continuous models provided the best fit to the observed data and also suggested that a two-factor model of externalizing behavior, defined as (1) ODD+ADHD+CD and (2) SUD with adult antisocial behavior sharing common variance with both factors, was necessary to explain the covariation in externalizing disorders. The two-factor model of externalizing behavior was then replicated using a nationally representative sample drawn from the National Comorbidity Survey-Replication data (n = 5,692). These results have important implications for the conceptualization of externalizing disorders in DSM-5.
品行障碍(CD)、反社会人格障碍(ASPD)和物质使用障碍(SUD)之间的强烈关联似乎反映了对外化行为的普遍易感性。最近的研究已经将这种易感性描述为一个连续的尺度,而不是离散的类别,这表明《精神障碍诊断与统计手册》(DSM-5)的修订应该考虑到外化行为的潜在连续体。然而,大多数此类研究并未包括出现在儿童期的障碍测量值[例如,注意缺陷多动障碍(ADHD)或对立违抗性障碍(ODD)],也没有考虑到外化行为潜在结构的全部可能性,特别是因素混合模型,该模型允许潜在因素既有连续又有分类维度。最后,大多数先前的研究都没有测试多维模型。使用来自快速通道项目(Fast Track Project)参与者的终生外化障碍诊断(n=715),我们分析了一系列潜在变量模型,范围从完全连续的因子模型到完全分类的混合模型。连续模型最适合观察数据,也表明,外化行为的两因素模型(1)ODD+ADHD+CD 和(2)SUD 与成年反社会行为与两个因素共享共同方差,是解释外化障碍协变所必需的。然后,使用来自国家共病调查-复制数据(n=5692)的全国代表性样本复制了外化行为的两因素模型。这些结果对 DSM-5 中外化障碍的概念化具有重要意义。