Department of Radiological Sciences, Medical Sciences, B-140, University of California, Irvine, CA 92697, USA.
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2013 Mar;29(3):535-44. doi: 10.1007/s10554-012-0119-0. Epub 2012 Aug 31.
Fractional flow reserve (FFR) is an important prognostic determinant in a clinical setting. However, its measurement currently requires the use of invasive pressure wire, while an angiographic technique based on first-pass distribution analysis and scaling laws can be used to measure FFR using only image data. Eight anesthetized swine were instrumented with flow probe on the proximal segment of the left anterior descending (LAD) coronary arteries. Volumetric blood flow from the flow probe (Qp), coronary pressure (Pa) and right atrium pressure (Pv) were continuously recorded. Flow probe-based FFR (FFRq) was measured from the ratio of flow with and without stenosis. To determine the angiography-based FFR (FFRa), the ratio of blood flow in the presence of a stenosis (QS) to theoretically normal blood flow (QN) was calculated. A region of interest in the LAD arterial bed was drawn to generate time-density curves using angiographic images. QS was measured using a time-density curve and the assumption that blood was momentarily replaced with contrast agent during the injection. QN was estimated from the total coronary arterial volume using scaling laws. Pressure-wire measurements of FFR (FFRp), which was calculated from the ratio of distal coronary pressure (Pd) divided by proximal pressure (Pa), were continuously obtained during the study. A total of 54 measurements of FFRa, FFRp, and FFRq were taken. FFRa showed a good correlation with FFRq (FFRa = 0.97 FFRq +0.06, r(2) = 0.80, p < 0.001), although FFRp overestimated the FFRq (FFRp = 0.657 FFRq + 0.313, r(2) = 0.710, p < 0.0001). Additionally, the Bland-Altman analysis showed a close agreement between FFRa and FFRq. This angiographic technique to measure FFR can potentially be used to evaluate both anatomical and physiological assessments of a coronary stenosis during routine diagnostic cardiac catheterization that requires no pressure wires.
分流量储备(FFR)是临床环境中重要的预后决定因素。然而,其测量目前需要使用侵入性压力导丝,而基于初次通过分布分析和比例定律的血管造影技术可以仅使用图像数据来测量 FFR。8 头麻醉猪在左前降支(LAD)冠状动脉的近端节段上安装了流量探头。连续记录流量探头(Qp)、冠状动脉压(Pa)和右心房压(Pv)的容积血流。通过狭窄前后的血流比测量基于流量探头的 FFR(FFRq)。为了确定基于血管造影的 FFR(FFRa),计算了狭窄时的血流(QS)与理论上正常血流(QN)的比值。使用血管造影图像在 LAD 动脉床上绘制感兴趣区域,以生成时间密度曲线。QS 通过时间密度曲线和注射过程中血液瞬间被造影剂替代的假设来测量。QN 使用比例定律从总冠状动脉容积估计。FFR 的压力导丝测量值(FFRp),通过远端冠状动脉压(Pd)除以近端压(Pa)的比值计算,在研究过程中连续获得。共进行了 54 次 FFRa、FFRp 和 FFRq 的测量。FFRa 与 FFRq 呈良好相关性(FFRa = 0.97 FFRq +0.06,r(2) = 0.80,p < 0.001),尽管 FFRp 高估了 FFRq(FFRp = 0.657 FFRq + 0.313,r(2) = 0.710,p < 0.0001)。此外,Bland-Altman 分析显示 FFRa 和 FFRq 之间具有良好的一致性。这种用于测量 FFR 的血管造影技术可以潜在地用于评估常规诊断性心导管检查期间冠状动脉狭窄的解剖和生理评估,而无需压力导丝。