• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

日常生活偏好量表:社区居住老年人的量表编制及心理社会偏好反应描述。

The preferences for everyday living inventory: scale development and description of psychosocial preferences responses in community-dwelling elders.

机构信息

Polisher Research Institute, Madlyn and Leonard Abramson Center for Jewish Life, 1425 Horsham Road, North Wales, PA 19454, USA.

出版信息

Gerontologist. 2013 Aug;53(4):582-95. doi: 10.1093/geront/gns102. Epub 2012 Aug 30.

DOI:10.1093/geront/gns102
PMID:22936532
Abstract

PURPOSE OF THE STUDY

Assessing preferences for daily life is the foundation for person-centered care delivery. This study tested a new measure, the Preferences for Everyday Living Inventory (PELI), with a large sample of community-dwelling older adults. We sought to evaluate the tool's convergent and divergent validity, identify the most commonly held preferences within the sample, and explore relationships between gender and race and strength of preferences.

DESIGN AND METHODS

Randomly selected African American and Caucasian home health agency clients (N = 437) were interviewed using the PELI. Respondents self-reported functional ability, physical health, affect, mental health, and five domains of psychosocial preferences. The study examined correlations among descriptive variables and preference items and used logistic regression to estimate relationships between gender and race and 55 PELI items and 10 descriptive covariates.

RESULTS

The study found support for the PELI's construct validity, identified seniors' most strongly held preferences across domains, and revealed significant differences in preferences by gender and race.

IMPLICATIONS

The PELI captures strongly held personal preferences and shows promise as a practical tool that allows providers to document client preferences and customize care accordingly.

摘要

研究目的

评估日常生活偏好是实现以患者为中心的护理服务的基础。本研究使用大量社区居住的老年人样本对一种新的评估工具,即日常生活偏好量表(PELI)进行了测试。我们旨在评估该工具的收敛和发散有效性,确定样本中最普遍的偏好,并探讨性别和种族与偏好强度之间的关系。

设计与方法

采用随机抽样方法选取了 437 名非裔美国人和白人家庭保健机构客户进行 PELI 访谈。受访者自我报告了功能能力、身体健康、情绪、心理健康和五个心理社会偏好领域。该研究检验了描述性变量和偏好项目之间的相关性,并使用逻辑回归估计了性别和种族与 55 个 PELI 项目和 10 个描述性协变量之间的关系。

结果

该研究支持了 PELI 的结构有效性,确定了老年人在各个领域的最强烈偏好,并揭示了性别和种族偏好的显著差异。

意义

PELI 捕捉到了强烈的个人偏好,有望成为一种实用工具,使提供者能够记录患者的偏好并相应地定制护理。

相似文献

1
The preferences for everyday living inventory: scale development and description of psychosocial preferences responses in community-dwelling elders.日常生活偏好量表:社区居住老年人的量表编制及心理社会偏好反应描述。
Gerontologist. 2013 Aug;53(4):582-95. doi: 10.1093/geront/gns102. Epub 2012 Aug 30.
2
Delivering Person-Centered Care: Important Preferences for Recipients of Long-term Services and Supports.提供以患者为中心的护理:长期服务和支持接受者的重要偏好。
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2018 Feb;19(2):169-173. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2017.10.005. Epub 2017 Nov 14.
3
Measurement properties of the Groningen Frailty Indicator in home-dwelling and institutionalized elderly people.格罗宁根虚弱指数在居家和机构老年人中的测量特性。
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2012 Jul;13(6):546-51. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2012.04.007. Epub 2012 May 12.
4
Important Care and Activity Preferences in a Nationally Representative Sample of Nursing Home Residents.全国代表性样本的养老院居民的重要护理和活动偏好。
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2018 Jan;19(1):25-32. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2017.06.028. Epub 2017 Aug 23.
5
Development of a social inclusion index to capture subjective and objective life domains (Phase II): psychometric development study.发展一个社会包容指数来捕捉主观和客观的生活领域(第二阶段):心理测量发展研究。
Health Technol Assess. 2012;16(1):iii-vii, ix-xii, -1-241. doi: 10.3310/hta16010.
6
Life satisfaction among older people (65+) with reduced self-care capacity: the relationship to social, health and financial aspects.自理能力下降的老年人(65岁及以上)的生活满意度:与社会、健康和经济方面的关系。
J Clin Nurs. 2006 May;15(5):607-18. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2006.01375.x.
7
Preferences for everyday living inventory (PELI): study protocol for piloting a culture-sensitive and setting-specific translated instrument in German care settings (PELI-D).日常生活偏好量表(PELI):在德国护理环境中对文化敏感且特定环境的翻译工具进行试点研究的方案(PELI-D)。
BMJ Open. 2020 Jan 7;10(1):e030268. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-030268.
8
Development and psychometric testing of the relocation self-efficacy scale.搬迁自我效能感量表的编制与心理测量学测试
Nurs Res. 2007 Jul-Aug;56(4):244-51. doi: 10.1097/01.NNR.0000280609.16244.de.
9
[Translation and culture sensitive adaptation of the PELI ("Preferences for Everyday Living Inventory") for nursing settings].[用于护理环境的PELI(“日常生活偏好量表”)的翻译及文化敏感调适]
Pflege. 2022 Feb;35(1):49-56. doi: 10.1024/1012-5302/a000824. Epub 2021 Aug 6.
10
Outcomes of social care for adults: developing a preference-weighted measure.成人社会关怀结局:偏好加权测量的发展。
Health Technol Assess. 2012;16(16):1-166. doi: 10.3310/hta16160.

引用本文的文献

1
Intersectional research on dementia care for post-migrants and ethnic minority groups: a scoping review.针对移民后代和少数族裔群体痴呆症护理的交叉性研究:一项范围综述
Front Dement. 2025 Aug 18;4:1596395. doi: 10.3389/frdem.2025.1596395. eCollection 2025.
2
Understanding Gender-Specific Daily Care Preferences: Topic Modeling Study.了解特定性别的日常护理偏好:主题建模研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2025 May 29;27:e64160. doi: 10.2196/64160.
3
Balancing Infection Risks and Residents Social Activity Preferences: Nursing Home Staff Risk Perceptions.
平衡感染风险与居民社交活动偏好:养老院工作人员的风险认知
Gerontologist. 2025 May 10;65(6). doi: 10.1093/geront/gnaf134.
4
Understanding Daily Care Experience Preferences Across the Lifespan of Older Adults: Application of Natural Language Processing.了解老年人一生的日常护理体验偏好:自然语言处理的应用
West J Nurs Res. 2025 Feb;47(2):71-81. doi: 10.1177/01939459241306946. Epub 2024 Dec 21.
5
Role of Namaste Care: A Person-Centered Approach to Enhance the Quality of Life of the Elderly with Alzheimer's Disease.合十礼关怀的作用:一种以人为主导的方法,用于提高阿尔茨海默病老年人的生活质量。
Galen Med J. 2023 Dec 18;12:e3205. doi: 10.31661/gmj.v12i.3205. eCollection 2023.
6
Are quality of care instruments inclusive of older people living with dementia? A scoping review in long-term care settings.在长期护理环境中,护理质量工具是否包含患有痴呆症的老年人?系统评价。
Dementia (London). 2024 Oct;23(7):1212-1237. doi: 10.1177/14713012241270758. Epub 2024 Aug 9.
7
Characteristics of Informal Caregivers and Social Participation of People With Dementia.照料者特征与痴呆患者的社会参与度。
Gerontologist. 2024 Oct 1;64(10). doi: 10.1093/geront/gnae096.
8
Caregiver interactions, perceived control, and meaning in life of elderly: the moderating effect of the elderly-to-social worker ratio.照顾者互动、感知控制与老年人生活意义:老年人与社工比例的调节作用。
BMC Geriatr. 2024 May 15;24(1):431. doi: 10.1186/s12877-024-05029-7.
9
Methods and approaches to facilitate inclusion of the views, perspectives and preferences of people with moderate-to-severe dementia in research: A narrative systematic review.促进中度至重度痴呆患者的观点、视角和偏好纳入研究的方法和途径:叙述性系统评价。
Int J Older People Nurs. 2024 Jan;19(1):e12594. doi: 10.1111/opn.12594. Epub 2023 Dec 11.
10
Exploration of the Content and Structure of Preferences for Leisure Activities of People Receiving Adult Day Services Using Concept Mapping.使用概念映射探索接受成人日间服务人群对休闲活动偏好的内容和结构。
Gerontologist. 2024 May 1;64(5). doi: 10.1093/geront/gnad142.