Altinok Kübra, Güney Seda, Yüceer Bugse, Razum Oliver, Roes Martina
German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Witten, Germany.
School of Public Health, Bielefeld University, Bielefeld, Germany.
Front Dement. 2025 Aug 18;4:1596395. doi: 10.3389/frdem.2025.1596395. eCollection 2025.
The aim of this scoping review is to identify the range, extent and nature of evidence available in peer-reviewed and gray literature and to examine how the intersecting experiences and differences of post-migrants and ethnic minority groups influence preferences.
The Arksey and O'Malley methodological framework and the PRISMA-ScR for Scoping Reviews confirm the rigor of the scoping review. We systematically searched across electronic databases including PubMed, MEDLINE via Ovid, CINAHL, Scopus, Cochrane Library as well as gray literature between December 2023 and September 2024. We included the articles in English, German, and Turkish languages without any publication date restrictions. We analyzed the identified intersectional determinants of preferences using inductive content analysis.
Limited studies focusing on the intersectional determinants of preferences of ethnic minority groups or post-migrants with dementia were found. After screening 1,404 studies, we identified 4 relevant papers through the search strategy. Additionally, we identified 18 records through hand-searching, gray literature, and reference list checks. In total, 22 articles were included in this review. Inductive content analysis allowed to reach six main-theme focusing on the preferences, which are preferences connected to informal care providers, expectations in nursing homes/care institutions, preferences of care setting, coping approaches and preferences, food preferences, and other daily preferences.
Our findings highlight the complexity of personal care preferences, showing that expectations and practices are shaped by cultural values, traditions, language barriers, immigration processes, shifting socioeconomic positions, and gender roles. The lack of attention to the preferences of the diverse groups and the limited support for their unique wishes and needs indicates a significant challenge in the health system. Caregiving choices and daily living are shaped by intersecting structural determinants and differences. However, there are still gaps in research, healthcare practices, and public awareness, making it harder to meet their preferences.
Registration DOI: https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/Z8T9H.
本范围综述的目的是确定同行评审文献和灰色文献中可用证据的范围、程度和性质,并研究移民后群体和少数族裔群体的交叉经历和差异如何影响偏好。
阿克西和奥马利的方法框架以及范围综述的PRISMA-ScR证实了范围综述的严谨性。我们在2023年12月至2024年9月期间,系统地检索了包括PubMed, 通过Ovid检索的MEDLINE、CINAHL、Scopus、Cochrane图书馆等电子数据库以及灰色文献。我们纳入了英语、德语和土耳其语的文章,没有任何出版日期限制。我们使用归纳性内容分析法分析了已确定的偏好交叉决定因素。
发现关注少数族裔群体或患有痴呆症的移民后群体偏好交叉决定因素的研究有限。在筛选了1404项研究后,我们通过检索策略确定了4篇相关论文。此外,我们通过手工检索、灰色文献和参考文献列表检查又确定了18条记录。本综述共纳入22篇文章。归纳性内容分析法得出了六个主要主题,重点关注偏好,即与非正式护理提供者相关的偏好、养老院/护理机构的期望、护理环境偏好、应对方式和偏好、食物偏好以及其他日常偏好。
我们的研究结果突出了个人护理偏好的复杂性,表明期望和实践受到文化价值观、传统、语言障碍、移民过程、不断变化的社会经济地位和性别角色的影响。对不同群体偏好的关注不足以及对其独特愿望和需求的支持有限,表明卫生系统面临重大挑战。护理选择和日常生活受到交叉结构决定因素和差异的影响。然而,在研究、医疗实践和公众意识方面仍存在差距,使得满足他们的偏好变得更加困难。