• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

了解老年人一生的日常护理体验偏好:自然语言处理的应用

Understanding Daily Care Experience Preferences Across the Lifespan of Older Adults: Application of Natural Language Processing.

作者信息

Min Se Hee, Woo Kyungmi, Song Jiyoun, Alexander Gregory L, O'Malley Terrence, Moen Maria D, Topaz Maxim

机构信息

University of Pennsylvania School of Nursing, Philadelphia, PA, USA.

Seoul National University College of Nursing, Seoul, South Korea.

出版信息

West J Nurs Res. 2025 Feb;47(2):71-81. doi: 10.1177/01939459241306946. Epub 2024 Dec 21.

DOI:10.1177/01939459241306946
PMID:39707813
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11742706/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Older adults are a heterogeneous group, and their care experience preferences are likely to be diverse and individualized. Thus, the aim of this study was to identify categories of older adults' care experience preferences and to examine similarities and differences across different age groups.

METHODS

The initial categories of older adults' care experience preferences were identified through a qualitative review of narrative text (n = 3134) in the ADVault data set. A natural language processing (NLP) algorithm was used to automatically and accurately define older adults' care experience preference categories. Descriptive statistics were used to examine similarities and differences in care experience preference categories across different age groups.

RESULTS

The overall average performance of NLP algorithms was relatively high (average -score = 0.88; range: 0.77-0.96). Through a qualitative review of 350 randomly selected texts, a total of 11 categories were identified. The most frequent category was music, followed by photographs, entertainment, family/friends, religion-related, atmosphere, flower/plants, pet, bed/bedding, hobby, and other. After applying the best performing NLP algorithm to each category, older adults' care experience preference categories were music (41.32%), followed by photographs (28.47%), entertainment (13.46%), religion-related (n = 12.69%), pet (12.22%), flower/plants (11.51%), family/friends (8.45%), atmosphere (7.75%), bed/bedding (6.12%), and hobby (5.45%). Young-old and old-old adults had similar care experience preferences with music being the most frequent category while old-old adults had photographs as the most frequent category for their care experience preference.

CONCLUSION

Clinicians must understand the distinct categories of care experience preferences and incorporate them into personalized care planning.

摘要

引言

老年人是一个异质性群体,他们对护理体验的偏好可能多种多样且因人而异。因此,本研究的目的是确定老年人护理体验偏好的类别,并检查不同年龄组之间的异同。

方法

通过对ADVault数据集中的叙述性文本(n = 3134)进行定性回顾,确定了老年人护理体验偏好的初始类别。使用自然语言处理(NLP)算法自动准确地定义老年人的护理体验偏好类别。描述性统计用于检查不同年龄组在护理体验偏好类别上的异同。

结果

NLP算法的总体平均性能相对较高(平均得分 = 0.88;范围:0.77 - 0.96)。通过对350篇随机选择的文本进行定性回顾,共确定了11个类别。最常见的类别是音乐,其次是照片、娱乐、家人/朋友、宗教相关、氛围、花卉/植物、宠物、床/床上用品、爱好和其他。将性能最佳的NLP算法应用于每个类别后,老年人的护理体验偏好类别为音乐(41.32%),其次是照片(28.47%)、娱乐(13.46%)、宗教相关(n = 12.69%)、宠物(12.22%)、花卉/植物(11.51%)、家人/朋友(8.45%)、氛围(7.75%)、床/床上用品(6.12%)和爱好(5.45%)。年轻老年人和高龄老年人的护理体验偏好相似,音乐是最常见的类别,而高龄老年人护理体验偏好中最常见的类别是照片。

结论

临床医生必须了解护理体验偏好的不同类别,并将其纳入个性化护理计划中。

相似文献

1
Understanding Daily Care Experience Preferences Across the Lifespan of Older Adults: Application of Natural Language Processing.了解老年人一生的日常护理体验偏好:自然语言处理的应用
West J Nurs Res. 2025 Feb;47(2):71-81. doi: 10.1177/01939459241306946. Epub 2024 Dec 21.
2
Social, health and lifestyle-related determinants of older adults' preferences for place of death in South Tyrol, Italy - a cross-sectional survey study.意大利南蒂罗尔地区老年人对死亡地点偏好的社会、健康和生活方式决定因素——一项横断面调查研究。
BMC Geriatr. 2024 Oct 31;24(1):899. doi: 10.1186/s12877-024-05485-1.
3
Social Reminiscence in Older Adults' Everyday Conversations: Automated Detection Using Natural Language Processing and Machine Learning.老年人日常对话中的社会怀旧:使用自然语言处理和机器学习的自动检测。
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Sep 15;22(9):e19133. doi: 10.2196/19133.
4
Older Adults' Preferences for Discussing Long-Term Life Expectancy: Results From a National Survey.老年人对讨论长期预期寿命的偏好:一项全国性调查的结果。
Ann Fam Med. 2018 Nov;16(6):530-537. doi: 10.1370/afm.2309.
5
Older Adults' Views and Communication Preferences About Cancer Screening Cessation.老年人对停止癌症筛查的看法及沟通偏好
JAMA Intern Med. 2017 Aug 1;177(8):1121-1128. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2017.1778.
6
Understanding community-dwelling older adults' preferences for home- and community-based services: A conjoint analysis.了解社区居住的老年人对家庭和社区为基础的服务的偏好:联合分析。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2024 Apr;152:104699. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2024.104699. Epub 2024 Jan 21.
7
Frail Older Adults' Needs and Preferences for Mobile Health Exercise Interventions Guided by Nudge Theory: AQualitative Analysis.基于助推理论的体弱老年人对移动健康运动干预的需求与偏好:一项定性分析
J Clin Nurs. 2025 May;34(5):1830-1839. doi: 10.1111/jocn.17419. Epub 2024 Aug 30.
8
Identifying Barriers to Post-Acute Care Referral and Characterizing Negative Patient Preferences Among Hospitalized Older Adults Using Natural Language Processing.利用自然语言处理技术识别住院老年患者接受后期康复治疗转诊的障碍,并描述其负面的患者偏好。
AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2023 Apr 29;2022:606-615. eCollection 2022.
9
Examining Generalizability of Older Adults' Preferences for Discussing Cessation of Screening Colonoscopies in Older Adults with Low Health Literacy.老年低健康素养人群停止筛查结肠镜检查偏好的可推广性研究
J Gen Intern Med. 2019 Nov;34(11):2512-2519. doi: 10.1007/s11606-019-05258-2. Epub 2019 Aug 26.
10
Deep Natural Language Processing Identifies Variation in Care Preference Documentation.深度自然语言处理识别护理偏好文档中的变化。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2020 Jun;59(6):1186-1194.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2019.12.374. Epub 2020 Jan 9.

本文引用的文献

1
Exploring the full potential of the electronic health record: the application of natural language processing for clinical practice.探索电子健康记录的全部潜力:自然语言处理在临床实践中的应用。
Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2025 Mar 3;24(2):332-337. doi: 10.1093/eurjcn/zvae091.
2
Using Natural Language Processing to Identify Stigmatizing Language in Labor and Birth Clinical Notes.使用自然语言处理技术识别分娩临床记录中的污名化语言
Matern Child Health J. 2024 Mar;28(3):578-586. doi: 10.1007/s10995-023-03857-4. Epub 2023 Dec 26.
3
The effect of receptive music therapy on older adults with mild cognitive impairment and depression: a randomized controlled trial.接受性音乐疗法对轻度认知障碍和抑郁的老年人的影响:一项随机对照试验。
Sci Rep. 2023 Dec 13;13(1):22159. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-49162-6.
4
Transitions in Social Networks From Young-Old to Old-Old Stage of Life Using Latent Transition Analysis.基于潜在类别分析的从中青年到老年晚期的社会网络转变。
J Aging Health. 2024 Jan;36(1-2):110-119. doi: 10.1177/08982643231177400. Epub 2023 May 19.
5
Experiences of older people, healthcare providers and caregivers on implementing person-centered care for community-dwelling older people: a systematic review and qualitative meta-synthesis.老年人、医疗保健提供者和护理人员在实施以社区居住老年人为中心的护理方面的经验:系统评价和定性荟萃分析。
BMC Geriatr. 2023 Mar 31;23(1):207. doi: 10.1186/s12877-023-03915-0.
6
Evaluation of a decided sample size in machine learning applications.机器学习应用中确定样本量的评估。
BMC Bioinformatics. 2023 Feb 14;24(1):48. doi: 10.1186/s12859-023-05156-9.
7
Understanding changes in mental health symptoms from young-old to old-old adults by sex using multiple-group latent transition analysis.采用多群组潜在转变分析方法,了解年轻老年人到年老老年人的心理健康症状变化情况,按性别进行划分。
Geroscience. 2023 Jun;45(3):1791-1801. doi: 10.1007/s11357-023-00729-1. Epub 2023 Jan 10.
8
A systematic review to identify the use of stated preference research in the field of older adult care.一项旨在确定老年人护理领域中陈述性偏好研究应用情况的系统评价。
Eur J Ageing. 2022 Nov 7;19(4):1005-1056. doi: 10.1007/s10433-022-00738-7. eCollection 2022 Dec.
9
Music Listening, Emotion, and Cognition in Older Adults.老年人的音乐聆听、情感与认知
Brain Sci. 2022 Nov 17;12(11):1567. doi: 10.3390/brainsci12111567.
10
Integrating patient values and preferences in healthcare: a systematic review of qualitative evidence.将患者价值观和偏好纳入医疗保健中:定性证据的系统评价。
BMJ Open. 2022 Nov 18;12(11):e067268. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-067268.