Suppr超能文献

吉西他滨与5-氟尿嘧啶持续经动脉灌注化疗用于晚期胰腺癌

Continuous transarterial infusion chemotherapy with gemcitabine and 5-Fluorouracil for advanced pancreatic carcinoma.

作者信息

Hong Guo-Bin, Zhou Jing-Xing, Sun Hua-Bin, Li Chun-Yang, Song Li-Qing

机构信息

The Fifth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, SunYat-sen University, Guangzhou,China.

出版信息

Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2012;13(6):2669-73. doi: 10.7314/apjcp.2012.13.6.2669.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Pancreatic carcinoma is one of the most malignant tumors of the alimentary system, with relatively high incidence rates. The purpose of this study was to assess the efficacy and safety of two regimens for advanced pancreatic carcinoma: continuous transarterial infusion versus systemic venous chemotherapy with gemcitabine and 5-fluorouracil.

METHODS

Of the 48 patients with advanced pancreatic carcinoma receiving chemotherapy with gemcitabine and 5-fluorouracil, 24 received the selective transarterial infusion, and 24 the systemic chemotherapy. For the continuous transarterial infusion group (experimental group), all patients received gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2,given by 30-minute transarterial infusion, on day 1 of a 4-week cycle for 2 cycles, and a dose of 600 mg/ m2 5-fluorouracil was infused on days 15 of a 4-week cycle for 2 cycles. For the systemic venous group (control group), gemcitabine and 5-fluorouracil were infused through a peripheral vein, a dose of 1000 mg/m2 gemcitabine being administrated over 30 min on days 1 and 8 of a 4-week cycle for 2 cycles, and a dose of 600 mg/m2 5-fluorouracil was infused on days 15 of a 4-week cycle for 2 cycles. The effectiveness and safety were evaluated after 2 cycles according to WHO criteria.

RESULTS

The objective effective rate in transarterial group was 33.3% versus 25% in the systemic group, the difference not being significant (P=0.626). Clinical benefit rates(CBR) in the transarterial and systemic groups were 83.3% and 58.3%, respectively (P=0.014). The means and medians for survival time in transarterial group were higher than those of the systemic group (P<0.005). at the same time, the adverse effects did not significantly differ between the two groups (P>0.05).

CONCLUSION

Continuous transarterial infusion chemotherapy with gemcitabine and 5-fluorouracil could improve clinical benefit rate and survival time of patients with advanced pancreatic carcinoma, compared with systemic venous chemotherapy. Since adverse effects were limited in the transarterial group, the regimen of continuous transarterial infusion chemotherapy can be used more extensively in clinical practice. A CT and MRI conventional sequence can be used for efficacy evaluation after chemotherapy in pancreatic carcinoma.

摘要

目的

胰腺癌是消化系统最恶性的肿瘤之一,发病率相对较高。本研究的目的是评估两种晚期胰腺癌治疗方案的疗效和安全性:持续动脉灌注化疗与吉西他滨和5-氟尿嘧啶的全身静脉化疗。

方法

48例接受吉西他滨和5-氟尿嘧啶化疗的晚期胰腺癌患者中,24例接受选择性动脉灌注化疗,24例接受全身化疗。持续动脉灌注化疗组(实验组)所有患者在4周周期的第1天接受1000mg/m²吉西他滨经动脉30分钟灌注,共2个周期;在4周周期的第15天接受600mg/m² 5-氟尿嘧啶灌注,共2个周期。全身静脉化疗组(对照组)经外周静脉输注吉西他滨和5-氟尿嘧啶,在4周周期的第1天和第8天经30分钟给予1000mg/m²吉西他滨,共2个周期;在4周周期的第15天接受600mg/m² 5-氟尿嘧啶灌注,共2个周期。2个周期后根据WHO标准评估疗效和安全性。

结果

动脉灌注化疗组的客观有效率为33.3%,全身化疗组为25%,差异无统计学意义(P=0.626)。动脉灌注化疗组和全身化疗组的临床受益率(CBR)分别为83.3%和58.3%(P=0.014)。动脉灌注化疗组的生存时间均值和中位数高于全身化疗组(P<0.005)。同时两组的不良反应无显著差异(P>0.05)。

结论

与全身静脉化疗相比,吉西他滨和5-氟尿嘧啶持续动脉灌注化疗可提高晚期胰腺癌患者的临床受益率和生存时间。由于动脉灌注化疗组的不良反应有限,则持续动脉灌注化疗方案在临床实践中可更广泛应用。CT和MRI常规序列可用于胰腺癌化疗后的疗效评估。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验