• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

土耳其结直肠癌患者及其一级亲属的结肠镜筛查参与情况

Screening colonoscopy participation in Turkish colorectal cancer patients and their first degree relatives.

作者信息

Kilickap Saadettin, Arslan Cagatay, Rama Dorina, Yalcin Suayib

机构信息

Department of Medical Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Cumhuriyet University, Sivas, Turkey.

出版信息

Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2012;13(6):2829-32. doi: 10.7314/apjcp.2012.13.6.2829.

DOI:10.7314/apjcp.2012.13.6.2829
PMID:22938467
Abstract

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to research the awareness of screening colonoscopy (SC) among patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) and their relatives.

METHODOLOGY

A questionnaire form including information and behavior about colonoscopic screening for CRCs of patients and their first-degree relatives (FDRs) was prepared.

RESULTS

A total of 406 CRC patients were enrolled into the study, with 1534 FDRs (siblings n: 1381 and parents n: 153) . Positive family history for CRC was found in 12% of the study population. Previous SC was performed in 11% of patients with CRC. Mean age of the patients whose FDRs underwent SC was lower than the patients whose FDRs did not (52 vs 57 years; p<0,001). The frequency of SC in FDRs was 64% in patients diagnosed CRC under 35 years of age. Persons having a positive family history of CRC had SC more often (51 vs 22%, p<0,001). FDRs of patients having a higher educational level and income had SC more frequently.

CONCLUSIONS

When screening for CRC is planned, elderly subjects, those with family history for CRC, and those with low educational and lower income should be given especial attention in order that they be convinced to undergo screening for CRC.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在调查结直肠癌(CRC)患者及其亲属对结肠镜筛查(SC)的认知情况。

方法

准备了一份问卷,内容包括患者及其一级亲属(FDRs)的结肠镜筛查信息及行为。

结果

共纳入406例CRC患者,其FDRs有1534人(兄弟姐妹1381人,父母153人)。12%的研究对象有CRC家族史阳性。11%的CRC患者曾接受过SC。FDRs接受过SC的患者平均年龄低于未接受过的患者(52岁对57岁;p<0.001)。35岁以下诊断为CRC的患者中,其FDRs接受SC的频率为64%。有CRC家族史阳性的人接受SC的比例更高(51%对22%,p<0.001)。教育水平和收入较高的患者的FDRs接受SC的频率更高。

结论

在计划进行CRC筛查时,应特别关注老年人群、有CRC家族史的人群以及教育水平和收入较低的人群,以使他们相信并接受CRC筛查。

相似文献

1
Screening colonoscopy participation in Turkish colorectal cancer patients and their first degree relatives.土耳其结直肠癌患者及其一级亲属的结肠镜筛查参与情况
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2012;13(6):2829-32. doi: 10.7314/apjcp.2012.13.6.2829.
2
Implementation of screening colonoscopy amongst first- degree relatives of patients with colorectal cancer in Turkey: a cross-sectional questionnaire based survey.土耳其结直肠癌患者一级亲属中结肠镜筛查的实施情况:一项基于横断面问卷调查的研究
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2014;15(14):5523-8. doi: 10.7314/apjcp.2014.15.14.5523.
3
Screening behaviors, health beliefs, and related factors of first-degree relatives of colorectal cancer patients with ongoing treatment in Turkey.土耳其正在接受治疗的结直肠癌患者一级亲属的筛查行为、健康观念及相关因素
Cancer Nurs. 2014 Nov-Dec;37(6):E51-60. doi: 10.1097/NCC.0000000000000121.
4
A population-based cross-sectional study of colorectal cancer screening practices of first-degree relatives of colorectal cancer patients.基于人群的结直肠癌患者一级亲属结直肠癌筛查实践的横断面研究。
BMC Cancer. 2013 Jan 10;13:13. doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-13-13.
5
Increased risk of colorectal neoplasia among family members of patients with colorectal cancer: a population-based study in Utah.结直肠癌患者家庭成员结直肠肿瘤发病风险增加:犹他州基于人群的研究。
Gastroenterology. 2014 Oct;147(4):814-821.e5; quiz e15-6. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2014.07.006. Epub 2014 Jul 17.
6
Determinants of adherence to screening by colonoscopy in individuals with a family history of colorectal cancer.有结直肠癌家族史人群行结肠镜筛查依从性的影响因素。
Patient Educ Couns. 2013 Nov;93(2):272-81. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2013.06.029. Epub 2013 Aug 2.
7
Getting the first degree relatives to screen for colorectal cancer is harder than it seems-patients' and their first degree relatives' perspectives.让一级亲属筛查结直肠癌比看起来要困难——患者及其一级亲属的观点。
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2017 Jul;32(7):1065-1068. doi: 10.1007/s00384-017-2818-4. Epub 2017 Apr 13.
8
Do individuals with a family history of colorectal cancer adhere to medical recommendations for the prevention of colorectal cancer?有结直肠癌家族史的个体是否遵循预防结直肠癌的医学建议?
Fam Cancer. 2013 Dec;12(4):629-37. doi: 10.1007/s10689-013-9627-x.
9
Assessment of family history of colorectal cancer in primary care: perceptions of first degree relatives of people with colorectal cancer.在初级保健中评估结直肠癌家族史:结直肠癌患者一级亲属的看法。
Patient Educ Couns. 2014 Mar;94(3):427-31. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2013.11.014. Epub 2013 Dec 14.
10
High uptake of colonoscopy in first-degree relatives of patients with colorectal cancer in a healthcare region: a population-based, prospective study.在一个医疗保健地区,结直肠癌患者的一级亲属中结肠镜检查的高吸收率:一项基于人群的前瞻性研究。
Endoscopy. 2010 Jan;42(1):15-21. doi: 10.1055/s-0029-1215324. Epub 2010 Jan 11.

引用本文的文献

1
Recognition and participation of colorectal cancer screening in Turkiye: A systematic review and meta-analysis study.土耳其结直肠癌筛查的认知与参与情况:一项系统评价与荟萃分析研究
North Clin Istanb. 2023 Nov 22;10(6):819-829. doi: 10.14744/nci.2022.94103. eCollection 2023.
2
Colonoscopy Screening Behaviour and Associated Factors Amongst First-Degree Relatives of People with Colorectal Cancer in China: Testing the Health Belief Model Using a Cross-Sectional Design.中国结直肠癌患者一级亲属结肠镜筛查行为及相关因素研究:基于健康信念模型的横断面调查
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Jul 8;17(14):4927. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17144927.
3
Determination of effective factors on geographic distribution of the incidence of colorectal cancer in Tehran using geographically weighted Poisson regression model.
使用地理加权泊松回归模型确定德黑兰结直肠癌发病率地理分布的影响因素
Med J Islam Repub Iran. 2019 Mar 27;33:23. doi: 10.34171/mjiri.33.23. eCollection 2019.
4
Association Between Socioeconomic Status and Participation in Colonoscopy Screening Program in First Degree Relatives of Colorectal Cancer Patients.社会经济地位与结直肠癌患者一级亲属参与结肠镜筛查项目之间的关联
Iran J Cancer Prev. 2016 Apr 24;9(2):e4809. doi: 10.17795/ijcp-4809. eCollection 2016 Apr.