Hollingworth Samantha, Fenny Ama Pokuaa, Yu Su-Yeon, Ruiz Francis, Chalkidou Kalipso
School of Pharmacy, University of Queensland, 20 Cornwall St, Woolloongabba, Brisbane, QLD, 4102, Australia.
Faculty of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology, Kumasi, Ghana.
Cost Eff Resour Alloc. 2021 Jul 7;19(1):39. doi: 10.1186/s12962-021-00293-5.
Countries in Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) are moving towards universal health coverage. The process of Health Technology Assessment (HTA) can support decisions relating to benefit package design and service coverage. HTA involves institutional cooperation with agreed methods and procedural standards. We systematically reviewed the literature on policies and capacity building to support HTA institutionalisation in SSA.
We systematically reviewed the literature by searching major databases (PubMed, Embase, etc.) until June 2019 using terms considering three aspects: HTA; health policy, decision making; and SSA. We quantitatively extracted and descriptively analysed content and conducted a narrative synthesis eliciting themes from the selected literature, which varied in study type and apporach.
Half of the 49 papers identified were primary research studies and mostly qualitative. Five countries were represented in six of ten studies; South Africa, Ghana, Uganda, Cameroon, and Ethiopia. Half of first authors were from SSA. Most informants were policy makers. Five themes emerged: (1) use of HTA; (2) decision-making in HTA; (3) values and criteria for setting priority areas in HTA; (4) involving stakeholders in HTA; and (5) specific examples of progress in HTA in SSA. The first one was the main theme where there was little use of evidence and research in making policy. The awareness of HTA and economic evaluation was low, with inadequate expertise and a lack of local data and tools.
Despite growing interest in HTA in SSA countries, awareness remains low and HTA-related activities are uncoordinated and often disconnected from policy. Further training and skills development are needed, firmly linked to a strategy focusing on strengthening within-country partnerships, particularly among researchers and policy makers. The international community has an important role here by supporting policy- relevant technical assistance, highlighting that sustainable financing demands evidence-based processes for effective resource allocation, and catalysing knowledge-sharing opportunities among countries facing similar challenges.
撒哈拉以南非洲地区(SSA)各国正朝着全民健康覆盖的目标迈进。卫生技术评估(HTA)过程可支持与福利包设计和服务覆盖范围相关的决策。HTA涉及机构间合作以及商定的方法和程序标准。我们系统回顾了关于支持SSA地区HTA制度化的政策和能力建设的文献。
我们通过检索主要数据库(如PubMed、Embase等),直至2019年6月,使用涵盖三个方面的术语进行系统文献回顾:HTA;卫生政策、决策制定;以及SSA。我们定量提取并描述性分析内容,并进行叙述性综合,从所选文献中提炼主题,这些文献在研究类型和方法上各不相同。
所确定的49篇论文中有一半是原发性研究,且大多为定性研究。十项研究中的六项涉及五个国家;南非、加纳、乌干达、喀麦隆和埃塞俄比亚。第一作者中有一半来自SSA。大多数受访者是政策制定者。出现了五个主题:(1)HTA的使用;(2)HTA中的决策制定;(3)HTA中确定优先领域的价值观和标准;(4)让利益相关者参与HTA;以及(5)SSA地区HTA进展的具体实例。第一个主题是主要主题,即政策制定中很少使用证据和研究。HTA和经济评估的意识较低,专业知识不足,缺乏本地数据和工具。
尽管SSA国家对HTA的兴趣日益浓厚,但意识仍然较低,与HTA相关的活动缺乏协调,且往往与政策脱节。需要进一步培训和技能发展,并与侧重于加强国内伙伴关系(特别是研究人员和政策制定者之间的伙伴关系)的战略紧密相连。国际社会在此方面可发挥重要作用,提供与政策相关的技术援助,强调可持续融资需要基于证据的有效资源分配流程,并促进面临类似挑战的国家之间的知识共享机会。