• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

新型猪源流感 A 快速检测的敏感性。

Rapid-test sensitivity for novel swine-origin pandemic influenza A.

机构信息

Department of Pediatrics, National Taiwan University Hospital, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan.

出版信息

J Formos Med Assoc. 2012 Aug;111(8):427-30. doi: 10.1016/j.jfma.2011.06.018. Epub 2012 Apr 30.

DOI:10.1016/j.jfma.2011.06.018
PMID:22939660
Abstract

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: Rapid diagnosis of influenza was important in the global pandemic influenza A/H1N1 outbreak. The QuickVue Influenza A+B test is one of the most common tests for rapid diagnosis of influenza. We evaluated the sensitivity and specificity of the test in children.

METHODS

We collected data from 970 patients with influenza-like illness who received rapid influenza antigen tests using the QuickVue Influenza A+B test as well as viral isolation. We compared the results with that of viral isolation and reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) assays.

RESULTS

Based on viral culture, the QuickVue Influenza A+B test had an overall sensitivity of 0.82 (419/513) and specificity of 0.99 (70/71), with a positive predictive value (PPV) of 0.74 (419/563) and a negative predictive value (NPV) of 0.77 (313/407). The sensitivity of QuickVue was significantly higher in specimens with high viral loads. If the viral loads were less than 10(6), the sensitivity of QuickVue was 0.62, while the sensitivity of QuickVue was 0.88 if the viral loads were higher than 10(6) (p<0.001). Logistic regression analysis showed that higher viral loads correlated with positive QuickVue results (p<0.001). On the first day of fever, the sensitivity of QuickVue was only 0.67; on the second day, the sensitivity was 0.86; on the third day, the sensitivity was 0.98, and on the fourth day, the sensitivity was 0.90. The sensitivity is significantly higher on days 2-3 in comparison with the first day of fever (p<0.05). We calculated the correlation of viral load and fever days, and the result showed higher mean viral load on the second and third days of fever. Age did not affect the sensitivity.

CONCLUSION

In children, the sensitivity of QuickVue Influenza A+B test was 0.82. In addition, the sensitivity was significantly elevated in the higher viral load group and on the third day of fever.

摘要

背景/目的:流感的快速诊断在全球甲型 H1N1 流感大流行中非常重要。QuickVue 流感 A+B 检测是用于快速诊断流感的最常见检测方法之一。我们评估了该检测方法在儿童中的敏感性和特异性。

方法

我们收集了 970 例流感样疾病患者的数据,这些患者使用 QuickVue 流感 A+B 检测进行了快速流感抗原检测,同时进行了病毒分离。我们将结果与病毒分离和逆转录聚合酶链反应(RT-PCR)检测进行了比较。

结果

根据病毒培养,QuickVue 流感 A+B 检测的总敏感性为 0.82(419/513),特异性为 0.99(70/71),阳性预测值(PPV)为 0.74(419/563),阴性预测值(NPV)为 0.77(313/407)。在病毒载量较高的标本中,QuickVue 的敏感性明显更高。如果病毒载量低于 10(6),QuickVue 的敏感性为 0.62,而如果病毒载量高于 10(6),QuickVue 的敏感性为 0.88(p<0.001)。逻辑回归分析表明,较高的病毒载量与 QuickVue 阳性结果相关(p<0.001)。在发热的第一天,QuickVue 的敏感性仅为 0.67;在第二天,敏感性为 0.86;在第三天,敏感性为 0.98,在第四天,敏感性为 0.90。与发热的第一天相比,第二天和第三天的敏感性明显更高(p<0.05)。我们计算了病毒载量和发热天数的相关性,结果显示发热的第二天和第三天病毒载量较高。年龄不影响敏感性。

结论

在儿童中,QuickVue 流感 A+B 检测的敏感性为 0.82。此外,在病毒载量较高的组和发热的第三天,敏感性明显升高。

相似文献

1
Rapid-test sensitivity for novel swine-origin pandemic influenza A.新型猪源流感 A 快速检测的敏感性。
J Formos Med Assoc. 2012 Aug;111(8):427-30. doi: 10.1016/j.jfma.2011.06.018. Epub 2012 Apr 30.
2
Evaluation of QuickVue influenza A+B rapid test for detection of pandemic influenza A/H1N1 2009.评价 QuickVue 流感 A+B 快速检测试剂盒用于检测 2009 年大流行的甲型 H1N1 流感。
J Clin Virol. 2010 Jun;48(2):120-2. doi: 10.1016/j.jcv.2010.03.010. Epub 2010 Apr 15.
3
Performance of rapid-test kits for the detection of the pandemic influenza A/H1N1 virus.快速检测试剂盒对大流行性流感 A/H1N1 病毒检测的性能。
J Virol Methods. 2011 May;173(2):387-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jviromet.2011.02.009. Epub 2011 Feb 17.
4
Performance of the QuickVue Influenza A+B rapid test for pandemic H1N1 (2009) virus infection in adults.快速检测甲型/乙型流感病毒试剂盒在成人中检测大流行 H1N1(2009)病毒感染的性能。
PLoS One. 2011;6(12):e28089. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0028089. Epub 2011 Dec 1.
5
Clinical performance of a rapid influenza test and comparison of nasal versus throat swabs to detect 2009 pandemic influenza A (H1N1) infection in Thai children.一种快速流感检测的临床性能,以及比较鼻拭子和咽拭子在检测泰国儿童 2009 年甲型 H1N1 流感感染中的应用。
Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2010 Apr;29(4):366-7. doi: 10.1097/INF.0b013e3181c6f05c.
6
Rapid antigen tests for diagnosis of pandemic (Swine) influenza A/H1N1.用于诊断甲型H1N1大流行性(猪)流感的快速抗原检测
Clin Infect Dis. 2009 Oct 1;49(7):1090-3. doi: 10.1086/644743.
7
Evaluation of rapid influenza virus tests in patients with influenza-like illness in Thailand.泰国流感样疾病患者中快速流感病毒检测的评估。
Clin Lab. 2012;58(9-10):905-10.
8
Use of two rapid influenza diagnostic tests, QuickNavi-Flu and QuickVue Influenza A+B, for rapid detection of pandemic influenza A (H1N1) 2009 viruses in Japanese pediatric outpatients over two consecutive seasons.两种快速流感诊断检测试剂(QuickNavi-Flu 和 QuickVue Influenza A+B)在日本儿科门诊连续两个季节中快速检测 2009 年甲型 H1N1 大流行流感病毒的应用。
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2013 Feb;75(2):222-4. doi: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2012.10.004. Epub 2012 Nov 7.
9
Diagnostic performance of rapid influenza antigen assays in patients infected with the new influenza A (H1N1) virus.新型甲型 H1N1 流感病毒感染患者中快速流感抗原检测的诊断性能。
Clin Chem Lab Med. 2010;48(1):53-6. doi: 10.1515/CCLM.2010.022.
10
Poor positive accuracy of QuickVue rapid antigen tests during the influenza A (H1N1) 2009 pandemic.快速抗原检测在甲型 H1N1 流感大流行期间的阳性准确率较差。
J Clin Microbiol. 2010 Oct;48(10):3729-31. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01562-10. Epub 2010 Aug 18.

引用本文的文献

1
Performance of rapid influenza diagnostic tests (QuickVue) for influenza A and B Infection in India.印度快速流感诊断检测(QuickVue)对甲型和乙型流感感染的检测性能。
Indian J Med Microbiol. 2015 Feb;33 Suppl(Suppl):26-31. doi: 10.4103/0255-0857.148831.