Anton Peter A, Cranston Ross D, Kashuba Angela, Hendrix Craig W, Bumpus Namandjé N, Richardson-Harman Nicola, Elliott Julie, Janocko Laura, Khanukhova Elena, Dennis Robert, Cumberland William G, Ju Chuan, Carballo-Diéguez Alex, Mauck Christine, McGowan Ian
Center for HIV Prevention Research , UCLA AIDS Institute, Department of Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, California 90095, USA.
AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses. 2012 Nov;28(11):1412-21. doi: 10.1089/aid.2012.0262. Epub 2012 Oct 9.
This study was designed to assess the safety, acceptability, pharmacokinetic (PK), and pharmacodynamic (PD) responses to rectal administration of tenofovir (TFV) 1% vaginally formulated gel and oral tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF). This study was designed as a phase 1, randomized, two-site (United States), double-blind, placebo-controlled study of sexually abstinent men and women. Eighteen participants received a single 300-mg exposure of oral TDF and were then randomized 2:1 to receive a single and then seven daily exposures of rectal TFV or hydroxyethyl cellulose (HEC) placebo gel. Safety endpoints included clinical adverse events (AEs) and mucosal safety parameters. Blood and colonic biopsies were collected for PK analyses and ex vivo HIV-1 challenge. No serious AEs were reported. However, AEs were significantly increased with 7-day TFV gel use, most prominently with gastrointestinal AEs (p=0.002). Only 25% of participants liked the TFV gel. Likelihood of use "if somewhat protective" was ∼75% in both groups. Indices of mucosal damage showed minimal changes. Tissue TFV diphosphate (TFV-DP) C(max) 30 min after single rectal exposure was 6-10 times greater than single oral exposure; tissue TFV-DP was 5.7 times greater following 7-day versus single rectal exposure. In vivo exposure correlated with significant ex vivo tissue infectibility suppression [single-rectal: p=0.12, analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) p=0.006; 7-day rectal: p=0.02, ANCOVA p=0.005]. Tissue PK-PD was significantly correlated (p=0.002). We conclude that rectal dosing with TFV 1% gel resulted in greater TFV-DP tissue detection than oral dosing with reduced ex vivo biopsy infectibility, enabling PK-PD correlations. On the basis of increased gastrointestinal AEs, rectally applied, vaginally formulated TFV was not entirely safe or acceptable, suggesting the need for alternative rectal-specific formulations.
本研究旨在评估经直肠给予1%替诺福韦(TFV)阴道用凝胶和口服富马酸替诺福韦二吡呋酯(TDF)的安全性、可接受性、药代动力学(PK)和药效学(PD)反应。本研究设计为一项1期、随机、双中心(美国)、双盲、安慰剂对照研究,纳入禁欲的男性和女性。18名参与者接受了一次300mg口服TDF暴露,然后按2:1随机分组,分别接受一次及随后连续7天的经直肠TFV或羟乙基纤维素(HEC)安慰剂凝胶暴露。安全性终点包括临床不良事件(AE)和黏膜安全性参数。采集血液和结肠活检样本用于PK分析和体外HIV-1挑战。未报告严重AE。然而,使用7天TFV凝胶后AE显著增加,最明显的是胃肠道AE(p=0.002)。只有25%的参与者喜欢TFV凝胶。两组中“如果有一定保护作用”的使用可能性约为75%。黏膜损伤指标显示变化极小。单次经直肠暴露后30分钟组织中替诺福韦二磷酸(TFV-DP)的C(max)比单次口服暴露高6至10倍;7天经直肠暴露后组织TFV-DP比单次经直肠暴露高5.7倍。体内暴露与显著的体外组织感染性抑制相关[单次经直肠:p=0.12,协方差分析(ANCOVA)p=0.006;7天经直肠:p=0.02,ANCOVA p=0.005]。组织PK-PD显著相关(p=0.002)。我们得出结论,与口服给药相比,经直肠给予1%TFV凝胶导致组织中TFV-DP检测量更高,且体外活检感染性降低,实现了PK-PD相关性。基于胃肠道AE增加,经直肠应用的阴道用TFV并不完全安全或可接受,提示需要替代的直肠专用制剂。