• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

非心源性病因导致的成人院外心脏骤停时,由非专业施救者行单纯胸外按压心肺复苏。

Chest compression-only cardiopulmonary resuscitation performed by lay rescuers for adult out-of-hospital cardiac arrest due to non-cardiac aetiologies.

机构信息

Arizona Emergency Medicine Research Center, Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85724, USA.

出版信息

Resuscitation. 2013 Apr;84(4):435-9. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2012.07.038. Epub 2012 Sep 1.

DOI:10.1016/j.resuscitation.2012.07.038
PMID:22947261
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Bystander CPR improves survival in patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). For adult sudden collapse, bystander chest compression-only CPR (COCPR) is recommended in some circumstances by the American Heart Association and European Resuscitation Council. However, adults who arrest from non-cardiac causes may also receive COCPR. Because rescue breathing may be more important for individuals suffering OHCA secondary to non-cardiac causes, COCPR is not recommended for these cases. We evaluated the relationship of lay rescuer COCPR and survival after OHCA from non-cardiac causes.

METHODS

Analysis of a statewide Utstein-style registry of adult OHCA, during a large scale campaign endorsing COCPR for OHCA from presumed cardiac cause. The relationship between lay rescuer CPR (both conventional CPR and COCPR) and survival to hospital discharge was evaluated.

RESULTS

Presumed non-cardiac aetiologies of OHCA accounted for 15% of all cases, and lay rescuer CPR was provided in 29% of these cases. Survival to hospital discharge occurred in 3.8% after conventional CPR, 2.7% after COCPR, and 4.0% after no CPR (p=0.85). The proportion of patients receiving COCPR was much lower in the cohort of OHCA from respiratory causes (8.3%) than for those with presumed cardiac OHCA (18.0%; p<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

In the setting of a campaign endorsing lay rescuer COCPR for cardiac OHCA, bystanders were less likely to perform COCPR on OHCA victims who might benefit from rescue breathing.

摘要

目的

旁观者心肺复苏术(CPR)可提高院外心脏骤停(OHCA)患者的生存率。美国心脏协会和欧洲复苏委员会建议,在某些情况下,对成人突然倒地,应采用旁观者单纯胸外按压心肺复苏术(COCPR)。然而,非心源性原因导致的成人骤停也可能接受 COCPR。由于对于非心源性 OHCA 患者,急救呼吸可能更为重要,因此不建议对这些患者进行 COCPR。我们评估了非心源性 OHCA 患者中旁观者 COCPR 与生存的关系。

方法

对一项全州范围的 Utstein 式 OHCA 登记研究进行分析,该研究在一项大规模活动中支持对疑似心源性 OHCA 采用 COCPR。评估了旁观者 CPR(传统 CPR 和 COCPR)与 OHCA 幸存者出院的关系。

结果

OHCA 的假定非心源性病因占所有病例的 15%,其中 29%的病例接受了旁观者 CPR。传统 CPR 后出院生存率为 3.8%,COCPR 后为 2.7%,无 CPR 后为 4.0%(p=0.85)。在呼吸原因导致的 OHCA 患者中,接受 COCPR 的患者比例明显低于假定心源性 OHCA 患者(8.3%比 18.0%;p<0.001)。

结论

在一项支持对心源性 OHCA 采用旁观者 COCPR 的活动中,旁观者对可能受益于急救呼吸的 OHCA 患者进行 COCPR 的可能性较低。

相似文献

1
Chest compression-only cardiopulmonary resuscitation performed by lay rescuers for adult out-of-hospital cardiac arrest due to non-cardiac aetiologies.非心源性病因导致的成人院外心脏骤停时,由非专业施救者行单纯胸外按压心肺复苏。
Resuscitation. 2013 Apr;84(4):435-9. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2012.07.038. Epub 2012 Sep 1.
2
Chest compression-only CPR by lay rescuers and survival from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.急救员行单纯胸外按压心肺复苏术和院外心脏骤停患者的生存
JAMA. 2010 Oct 6;304(13):1447-54. doi: 10.1001/jama.2010.1392.
3
Chest compression-only cardiopulmonary resuscitation for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest with public-access defibrillation: a nationwide cohort study.公共除颤体外心脏骤停时仅行胸外按压心肺复苏:一项全国性队列研究。
Circulation. 2012 Dec 11;126(24):2844-51. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.112.109504.
4
Do dispatcher instructions facilitate bystander-initiated cardiopulmonary resuscitation and improve outcomes in patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest? A comparison of family and non-family bystanders.调度员的指导是否有助于旁观者启动心肺复苏并改善院外心脏骤停患者的预后?对家属和非家属旁观者的比较。
Resuscitation. 2014 Mar;85(3):315-9. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2013.11.013. Epub 2013 Nov 26.
5
Continuous chest compression versus interrupted chest compression for cardiopulmonary resuscitation of non-asphyxial out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.持续胸外按压与间断胸外按压用于非窒息性院外心脏骤停心肺复苏的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Mar 27;3(3):CD010134. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010134.pub2.
6
Dissemination of Chest Compression-Only Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Survival After Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest.单纯胸外按压心肺复苏术的传播与院外心脏骤停后患者的生存
Circulation. 2015 Aug 4;132(5):415-22. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.114.014905. Epub 2015 Jun 5.
7
Traumatic out-of-hospital cardiac arrests in Melbourne, Australia.澳大利亚墨尔本院外创伤性心搏骤停。
Resuscitation. 2012 Apr;83(4):465-70. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2011.09.025. Epub 2011 Oct 10.
8
Effect of rescue breathing by lay rescuers for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest caused by respiratory disease: a nationwide, population-based, propensity score-matched study.非专业救援者实施的口对口人工呼吸对呼吸系统疾病所致院外心脏骤停的影响:一项基于全国人群的倾向评分匹配研究。
Intern Emerg Med. 2017 Jun;12(4):493-501. doi: 10.1007/s11739-016-1472-0. Epub 2016 May 30.
9
Utstein style analysis of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest--bystander CPR and end expired carbon dioxide.院外心脏骤停的 Utstein 式分析——旁观者心肺复苏与呼气末二氧化碳
Resuscitation. 2007 Mar;72(3):404-14. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2006.07.012. Epub 2006 Dec 11.
10
Chest compression-only versus conventional cardiopulmonary resuscitation for bystander-witnessed out-of-hospital cardiac arrest of medical origin: A propensity score-matched cohort from 143,500 patients.单纯胸外按压与常规心肺复苏用于院外医疗原因所致目击者心搏骤停:来自 143500 例患者的倾向评分匹配队列研究。
Resuscitation. 2018 May;126:29-35. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2018.02.017. Epub 2018 Feb 21.

引用本文的文献

1
Sudden death in young South European population: a cross-sectional study of postmortem cases.年轻的南欧人群中的猝死:死后案例的横断面研究。
Sci Rep. 2023 Dec 20;13(1):22734. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-47502-0.
2
Outcome analysis of traumatic out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients according to the mechanism of injury: A nationwide observation study.根据损伤机制对创伤性院外心脏骤停患者的结局分析:一项全国性观察研究。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 Nov 6;99(45):e23095. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000023095.
3
Telephone CPR: Current Status, Challenges, and Future Perspectives.
电话心肺复苏术:现状、挑战与未来展望。
Open Access Emerg Med. 2020 Sep 7;12:193-200. doi: 10.2147/OAEM.S259700. eCollection 2020.
4
Current evidence of survival benefit between chest-compression only versus standard cardiopulmonary resuscitation in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest : Updated systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials with trial sequential analysis.目前关于院外心脏骤停时单纯胸外按压与标准心肺复苏相比的生存获益的证据:更新的系统评价和试验序贯分析的随机对照试验荟萃分析。
Herz. 2021 Sep;46(Suppl 2):198-208. doi: 10.1007/s00059-020-04982-4. Epub 2020 Sep 25.
5
[Adult basic life support and automated external defibrillation.].[成人基础生命支持和自动体外除颤。]
Notf Rett Med. 2017;20(Suppl 1):3-24. doi: 10.1007/s10049-017-0328-0. Epub 2017 Jun 29.
6
[Adult basic life support and automated external defibrillation.].[成人基础生命支持和自动体外除颤。]
Notf Rett Med. 2015;18(8):748-769. doi: 10.1007/s10049-015-0081-1. Epub 2015 Nov 9.
7
Relationship between level of CPR training, self-reported skills, and actual manikin test performance-an observational study.心肺复苏培训水平、自我报告的技能与实际模拟人测试表现之间的关系——一项观察性研究。
Int J Emerg Med. 2019 Jan 10;12(1):2. doi: 10.1186/s12245-018-0220-9.
8
Improved survival of hospitalized patients with cardiac arrest due to coronary heart disease after implementation of post-cardiac arrest care: A population-based study.实施心脏骤停后护理后冠心病所致心脏骤停住院患者生存率的改善:一项基于人群的研究。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2018 Sep;97(37):e12382. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000012382.
9
Survival rate variation among different types of hospitalized traumatic cardiac arrest: A retrospective and nationwide study.不同类型住院创伤性心脏骤停的生存率差异:一项全国性回顾性研究。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2018 Jul;97(28):e11480. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000011480.
10
Survival factors of hospitalized out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients in Taiwan: A retrospective study.台湾地区院外心脏骤停住院患者的生存因素:一项回顾性研究。
PLoS One. 2018 Feb 8;13(2):e0191954. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0191954. eCollection 2018.