Suppr超能文献

非心源性病因导致的成人院外心脏骤停时,由非专业施救者行单纯胸外按压心肺复苏。

Chest compression-only cardiopulmonary resuscitation performed by lay rescuers for adult out-of-hospital cardiac arrest due to non-cardiac aetiologies.

机构信息

Arizona Emergency Medicine Research Center, Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85724, USA.

出版信息

Resuscitation. 2013 Apr;84(4):435-9. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2012.07.038. Epub 2012 Sep 1.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Bystander CPR improves survival in patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). For adult sudden collapse, bystander chest compression-only CPR (COCPR) is recommended in some circumstances by the American Heart Association and European Resuscitation Council. However, adults who arrest from non-cardiac causes may also receive COCPR. Because rescue breathing may be more important for individuals suffering OHCA secondary to non-cardiac causes, COCPR is not recommended for these cases. We evaluated the relationship of lay rescuer COCPR and survival after OHCA from non-cardiac causes.

METHODS

Analysis of a statewide Utstein-style registry of adult OHCA, during a large scale campaign endorsing COCPR for OHCA from presumed cardiac cause. The relationship between lay rescuer CPR (both conventional CPR and COCPR) and survival to hospital discharge was evaluated.

RESULTS

Presumed non-cardiac aetiologies of OHCA accounted for 15% of all cases, and lay rescuer CPR was provided in 29% of these cases. Survival to hospital discharge occurred in 3.8% after conventional CPR, 2.7% after COCPR, and 4.0% after no CPR (p=0.85). The proportion of patients receiving COCPR was much lower in the cohort of OHCA from respiratory causes (8.3%) than for those with presumed cardiac OHCA (18.0%; p<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

In the setting of a campaign endorsing lay rescuer COCPR for cardiac OHCA, bystanders were less likely to perform COCPR on OHCA victims who might benefit from rescue breathing.

摘要

目的

旁观者心肺复苏术(CPR)可提高院外心脏骤停(OHCA)患者的生存率。美国心脏协会和欧洲复苏委员会建议,在某些情况下,对成人突然倒地,应采用旁观者单纯胸外按压心肺复苏术(COCPR)。然而,非心源性原因导致的成人骤停也可能接受 COCPR。由于对于非心源性 OHCA 患者,急救呼吸可能更为重要,因此不建议对这些患者进行 COCPR。我们评估了非心源性 OHCA 患者中旁观者 COCPR 与生存的关系。

方法

对一项全州范围的 Utstein 式 OHCA 登记研究进行分析,该研究在一项大规模活动中支持对疑似心源性 OHCA 采用 COCPR。评估了旁观者 CPR(传统 CPR 和 COCPR)与 OHCA 幸存者出院的关系。

结果

OHCA 的假定非心源性病因占所有病例的 15%,其中 29%的病例接受了旁观者 CPR。传统 CPR 后出院生存率为 3.8%,COCPR 后为 2.7%,无 CPR 后为 4.0%(p=0.85)。在呼吸原因导致的 OHCA 患者中,接受 COCPR 的患者比例明显低于假定心源性 OHCA 患者(8.3%比 18.0%;p<0.001)。

结论

在一项支持对心源性 OHCA 采用旁观者 COCPR 的活动中,旁观者对可能受益于急救呼吸的 OHCA 患者进行 COCPR 的可能性较低。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验