• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

青少年早期的优势-受欢迎程度状况、行为及性活动的出现

Dominance-popularity status, behavior, and the emergence of sexual activity in young adolescents.

作者信息

de Bruyn Eddy H, Cillessen Antonius H N, Weisfeld Glenn E

机构信息

Institute of Educational and Behavioral Studies, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Evol Psychol. 2012 Jun 21;10(2):296-319. doi: 10.1177/147470491201000209.

DOI:10.1177/147470491201000209
PMID:22947640
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10426891/
Abstract

In this paper, we investigated the sexual activity levels of several subtypes of middle adolescents (age 14-15 years). The subtype profiles were based on dominance-popularity status and a range of behaviors associated with dominance and popularity. In addition, gender differences in behavioral profiles were examined among dominant-popular, sexually active young adolescents. Results showed that socially dominant and popular young adolescent boys who exhibited a highly aggressive profile were more sexually active than their low-status and non-aggressive male peers; dominant-popular girls who were very attractive and gossips were more sexually active than their female peers. The results are discussed from an evolutionary psychological framework.

摘要

在本文中,我们调查了中年青少年(14 - 15岁)几个亚型的性活动水平。亚型概况基于优势 - 受欢迎程度以及一系列与优势和受欢迎程度相关的行为。此外,还研究了在占主导地位且受欢迎的性活跃青少年中行为概况的性别差异。结果表明,表现出高度攻击性概况的社会主导型且受欢迎的青少年男孩比其地位较低且不具攻击性的男性同龄人更具性活跃度;非常有吸引力且爱说闲话的占主导地位且受欢迎的女孩比其女性同龄人更具性活跃度。我们从进化心理学框架对结果进行了讨论。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6652/10426891/0d0109f13f84/10.1177_147470491201000209-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6652/10426891/78a44384325a/10.1177_147470491201000209-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6652/10426891/0d0109f13f84/10.1177_147470491201000209-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6652/10426891/78a44384325a/10.1177_147470491201000209-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6652/10426891/0d0109f13f84/10.1177_147470491201000209-fig2.jpg

相似文献

1
Dominance-popularity status, behavior, and the emergence of sexual activity in young adolescents.青少年早期的优势-受欢迎程度状况、行为及性活动的出现
Evol Psychol. 2012 Jun 21;10(2):296-319. doi: 10.1177/147470491201000209.
2
Who Sets the Aggressive Popularity Norm in Classrooms? It's the Number and Strength of Aggressive, Prosocial, and Bi-Strategic Adolescents.谁在课堂上设定了激进的受欢迎规范?是具有攻击性、亲社会和双策略的青少年的数量和实力。
J Abnorm Child Psychol. 2020 Jan;48(1):13-27. doi: 10.1007/s10802-019-00571-0.
3
Aggressive effects of prioritizing popularity in early adolescence.青春期早期将受欢迎程度置于优先地位的不良影响。
Aggress Behav. 2014 May-Jun;40(3):204-13. doi: 10.1002/ab.21518. Epub 2013 Dec 11.
4
Friendship Dynamics of Adolescent Aggression, Prosocial Behavior, and Social Status: The Moderating Role of Gender.青少年攻击行为、亲社会行为和社会地位的友谊动态:性别调节作用。
J Youth Adolesc. 2017 Nov;46(11):2305-2320. doi: 10.1007/s10964-017-0702-8. Epub 2017 Jul 11.
5
Does humor explain why relationally aggressive adolescents are popular?幽默能否解释为什么具有关系攻击性的青少年很受欢迎?
J Youth Adolesc. 2014 Aug;43(8):1322-32. doi: 10.1007/s10964-013-0031-5. Epub 2013 Oct 18.
6
The Role of Prosocial and Aggressive Popularity Norm Combinations in Prosocial and Aggressive Friendship Processes.亲社会和攻击性受欢迎规范组合在亲社会和攻击性友谊发展过程中的作用。
J Youth Adolesc. 2020 Mar;49(3):645-663. doi: 10.1007/s10964-019-01088-x. Epub 2019 Aug 12.
7
Status Differences in Target-Specific Prosocial Behavior and Aggression.目标特定亲社会行为和攻击行为中的地位差异。
J Youth Adolesc. 2016 Sep;45(9):1836-48. doi: 10.1007/s10964-016-0481-7. Epub 2016 Apr 15.
8
The relationship between aggressive behavior and puberty in normal adolescents: a longitudinal study.
J Adolesc Health. 1994 Jun;15(4):319-26. doi: 10.1016/1054-139x(94)90605-x.
9
Peer status beyond adolescence: Types and behavioral associations.青春期后的同伴地位:类型与行为关联
J Adolesc. 2015 Dec;45:1-10. doi: 10.1016/j.adolescence.2015.08.013. Epub 2015 Sep 5.
10
Peer status and aggression as predictors of dating popularity in adolescence.同伴地位和攻击性对青少年约会受欢迎程度的预测作用。
J Youth Adolesc. 2015 Mar;44(3):683-95. doi: 10.1007/s10964-014-0174-z. Epub 2014 Aug 29.

引用本文的文献

1
Infidelity in the Adolescence Stage: The Roles of Negative Affect, Hostility, and Psychological Well-Being.青少年阶段的不忠行为:负面情绪、敌意和心理健康的作用。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Feb 25;20(5):4114. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20054114.
2
Direct Aggression and the Balance between Status and Affection Goals in Adolescence.青少年时期的直接攻击与地位和情感目标之间的平衡。
J Youth Adolesc. 2020 Jul;49(7):1481-1491. doi: 10.1007/s10964-019-01166-0. Epub 2019 Nov 15.
3
Muscularity and Strength Affect Individual Variation in Self-Perception of Fighting Ability in Men.

本文引用的文献

1
The Literature On Cluster Analysis.《关于聚类分析的文献》
Multivariate Behav Res. 1978 Jul 1;13(3):271-95. doi: 10.1207/s15327906mbr1303_2.
2
Dominance hierarchies in groups of middle to late adolescent males.青少年中期到后期男性群体中的支配等级。
J Youth Adolesc. 1980 Feb;9(1):75-85. doi: 10.1007/BF02088381.
3
Indirect peer aggression in adolescence and reproductive behavior.青少年期的间接同伴攻击与生殖行为。
肌肉发达程度和力量影响男性对自身格斗能力认知的个体差异。
Front Psychol. 2019 Jan 22;10:18. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00018. eCollection 2019.
4
Invariances in the architecture of pride across small-scale societies.小规模社会中自豪感结构的不变性。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018 Aug 14;115(33):8322-8327. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1808418115. Epub 2018 Aug 1.
5
Intrasexual Competition and Height in Adolescents and Adults.青少年及成年人中的同性竞争与身高
Evol Psychol. 2018 Jan-Mar;16(1):1474704917749172. doi: 10.1177/1474704917749172.
Evol Psychol. 2010 Feb 17;8(1):49-65. doi: 10.1177/147470491000800106.
4
Social dominance in adolescence: the moderating role of the classroom context and behavioral heterogeneity.青少年时期的社会支配地位:课堂环境和行为异质性的调节作用。
Child Dev. 2009 Mar-Apr;80(2):338-55. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2009.01264.x.
5
Social dominance in preschool classrooms.学前课堂中的社会主导地位。
J Comp Psychol. 2007 Feb;121(1):54-64. doi: 10.1037/0735-7036.121.1.54.
6
Developmental trajectories of adolescent popularity: a growth curve modelling analysis.青少年受欢迎程度的发展轨迹:一项生长曲线建模分析。
J Adolesc. 2006 Dec;29(6):935-59. doi: 10.1016/j.adolescence.2006.05.005. Epub 2006 Jul 24.
7
The evolutionary psychology of facial beauty.面部美的进化心理学
Annu Rev Psychol. 2006;57:199-226. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.57.102904.190208.
8
Female competition: causes, constraints, content, and contexts.女性竞争:原因、限制因素、内容及背景
J Sex Res. 2004 Feb;41(1):16-26. doi: 10.1080/00224490409552210.
9
From censure to reinforcement: developmental changes in the association between aggression and social status.从责难到强化:攻击行为与社会地位之间关联的发展变化
Child Dev. 2004 Jan-Feb;75(1):147-63. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2004.00660.x.
10
Current evolutionary perspectives on adolescent romantic relations and sexuality.当前关于青少年恋爱关系和性行为的进化观点。
J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2004 Jan;43(1):11-9; discussion 20-3. doi: 10.1097/00004583-200401000-00010.