• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一种基于生殖威胁的嫉妒心理中性别差异进化模型。

A reproductive threat-based model of evolved sex differences in jealousy.

作者信息

Sagarin Brad J, Becker D Vaughn, Guadagno Rosanna E, Wilkinson Wayne W, Nicastle Lionel D

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Northern Illinois University, DeKalb, IL, USA.

出版信息

Evol Psychol. 2012 Aug 10;10(3):487-503. doi: 10.1177/147470491201000307.

DOI:10.1177/147470491201000307
PMID:22947673
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10481096/
Abstract

Although heterosexual women and men consistently demonstrate sex differences in jealousy, these differences disappear among lesbians and gay men as well as among heterosexual women and men contemplating same-sex infidelities (infidelities in which the partner and rival are the same sex). Synthesizing these past findings, the present paper offers a reproductive threat-based model of evolved sex differences in jealousy that predicts that the sexes will differ only when the jealous perceivers' reproductive outcomes are differentially at risk. This model is supported by data from a web-based study in which lesbians, gay men, bisexual women and men, and heterosexual women and men responded to a hypothetical infidelity scenario with the sex of the rival randomly determined. After reading the scenario, participants indicated which type of infidelity (sexual versus emotional) would cause greater distress. Consistent with predictions, heterosexual women and men showed a sex difference when contemplating opposite-sex infidelities but not when contemplating same-sex infidelities, whereas lesbians and gay men showed no sex difference regardless of whether the infidelity was opposite-sex or same-sex.

摘要

尽管异性恋女性和男性在嫉妒方面始终表现出性别差异,但这些差异在女同性恋者和男同性恋者中以及在考虑同性不忠行为(伴侣和情敌为同性的不忠行为)的异性恋女性和男性中消失了。综合过去的这些研究结果,本文提出了一种基于生殖威胁的嫉妒进化性别差异模型,该模型预测,只有当嫉妒者的生殖结果面临不同风险时,两性才会存在差异。一项基于网络的研究数据支持了该模型,在这项研究中,女同性恋者、男同性恋者、双性恋女性和男性以及异性恋女性和男性对一个假设的不忠情景做出反应,其中情敌的性别是随机确定的。阅读情景后,参与者指出哪种类型的不忠行为(性不忠与情感不忠)会导致更大的痛苦。与预测一致,异性恋女性和男性在考虑异性不忠行为时表现出性别差异,但在考虑同性不忠行为时则没有,而女同性恋者和男同性恋者无论不忠行为是异性还是同性都没有表现出性别差异。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9243/10481096/d3df69d79395/10.1177_147470491201000307-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9243/10481096/d3df69d79395/10.1177_147470491201000307-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9243/10481096/d3df69d79395/10.1177_147470491201000307-fig1.jpg

相似文献

1
A reproductive threat-based model of evolved sex differences in jealousy.一种基于生殖威胁的嫉妒心理中性别差异进化模型。
Evol Psychol. 2012 Aug 10;10(3):487-503. doi: 10.1177/147470491201000307.
2
Upset Over Sexual versus Emotional Infidelity Among Gay, Lesbian, Bisexual, and Heterosexual Adults.男同性恋、女同性恋、双性恋和异性恋成年人对性不忠与情感不忠的困扰。
Arch Sex Behav. 2016 Jan;45(1):175-91. doi: 10.1007/s10508-014-0409-9. Epub 2014 Dec 18.
3
Jealousy Is Influenced by Sex of the Individual, Their Partner, and Their Rival.嫉妒受个体、其伴侣和其竞争对手的性别的影响。
Arch Sex Behav. 2022 Aug;51(6):2867-2877. doi: 10.1007/s10508-022-02341-4. Epub 2022 Jul 20.
4
Emotional and sexual jealousy as a function of sex and sexual orientation in a Brazilian sample.巴西样本中作为性别和性取向函数的情感嫉妒与性嫉妒
Psychol Rep. 2006 Apr;98(2):529-35. doi: 10.2466/pr0.98.2.529-535.
5
Interest, Personality, and Sexual Traits That Distinguish Heterosexual, Bisexual, and Homosexual Individuals: Are There Two Dimensions That Underlie Variations in Sexual Orientation?性取向的个体差异:性取向的基础是两种维度吗?——区分异性恋、双性恋和同性恋个体的兴趣、人格和性特征
Arch Sex Behav. 2020 Feb;49(2):607-622. doi: 10.1007/s10508-020-01643-9. Epub 2020 Jan 27.
6
Sexual and romantic jealousy in heterosexual and homosexual adults.异性恋和同性恋成年人中的性嫉妒与浪漫嫉妒。
Psychol Sci. 2002 Jan;13(1):7-12. doi: 10.1111/1467-9280.00402.
7
Sexual health behaviors and sexual orientation in a U.S. national sample of college students.美国大学生全国样本中的性健康行为与性取向
Arch Sex Behav. 2013 Nov;42(8):1561-72. doi: 10.1007/s10508-012-0066-9. Epub 2013 Feb 28.
8
Comparing Heterosexuals' and Gay Men/Lesbians' Responses to Relationship Problems and the Effects of Internalized Homophobia on Gay Men/Lesbians' Responses to Relationship Problems in Turkey.比较土耳其异性恋者与男同性恋者/女同性恋者对关系问题的反应以及内化恐同症对土耳其男同性恋者/女同性恋者关系问题反应的影响。
J Homosex. 2017;64(2):218-238. doi: 10.1080/00918369.2016.1174028. Epub 2016 Apr 7.
9
Body image satisfaction in heterosexual, gay, and lesbian adults.异性恋、男同性恋和女同性恋成年人的身体意象满意度。
Arch Sex Behav. 2009 Oct;38(5):713-25. doi: 10.1007/s10508-008-9378-1. Epub 2008 Aug 19.
10
Spatial distance regulates sex-specific feelings to suspected sexual and emotional infidelity.空间距离调节对疑似性和情感不忠行为的性别特异性感受。
Evol Psychol. 2011 Sep 15;9(3):417-29. doi: 10.1177/147470491100900310.

引用本文的文献

1
Male Sex, Masculinization, Sexual Orientation, and Gynephilia Synergistically Predict Increased Sexual Jealousy.男性性别、男性化、性取向和恋女癖协同预测性嫉妒增加。
Arch Sex Behav. 2025 Aug 22. doi: 10.1007/s10508-025-03225-z.
2
Testing Women's Trust in Other Women and Same-Sex Attracted Males in Three Cultures.测试三个文化中女性对其他女性和同性吸引男性的信任。
Arch Sex Behav. 2021 Nov;50(8):3479-3488. doi: 10.1007/s10508-021-02139-w. Epub 2021 Sep 8.

本文引用的文献

1
Evolution, traits, and the stages of human courtship: qualifying the parental investment model.进化、特征与人类求偶阶段:限定亲代投资模型。
J Pers. 1990 Mar;58(1):97-116. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.1990.tb00909.x.
2
Can manipulations of cognitive load be used to test evolutionary hypotheses?认知负荷的操控能否用于检验进化假说?
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2006 Sep;91(3):513-8. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.91.3.513.
3
Men and women show distinct brain activations during imagery of sexual and emotional infidelity.男性和女性在想象性不忠和情感不忠时会表现出不同的大脑激活情况。
Neuroimage. 2006 Sep;32(3):1299-307. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.05.049. Epub 2006 Jul 7.
4
Some myths and anomalies in the study of Roman sexuality.罗马性取向研究中的一些神话与异常现象。
J Homosex. 2005;49(3-4):209-69. doi: 10.1300/j082v49n03_08.
5
Reconsiderations about Greek homosexualities.关于希腊同性恋的再思考。
J Homosex. 2005;49(3-4):13-61. doi: 10.1300/j082v49n03_02.
6
Reconsidering evolved sex differences in jealousy: comment on Harris (2003).重新审视嫉妒中进化出的性别差异:对哈里斯(2003年)的评论
Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 2005;9(1):62-75; discussion 76-86. doi: 10.1207/s15327957pspr0901_5.
7
A review of sex differences in sexual jealousy, including self-report data, psychophysiological responses, interpersonal violence, and morbid jealousy.对性嫉妒中的性别差异进行综述,内容包括自我报告数据、心理生理反应、人际暴力和病态嫉妒。
Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 2003;7(2):102-28. doi: 10.1207/S15327957PSPR0702_102-128.
8
Sex differences in jealousy: evolutionary mechanism or artifact of measurement?嫉妒中的性别差异:进化机制还是测量假象?
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2002 Nov;83(5):1103-16.
9
Sexual and romantic jealousy in heterosexual and homosexual adults.异性恋和同性恋成年人中的性嫉妒与浪漫嫉妒。
Psychol Sci. 2002 Jan;13(1):7-12. doi: 10.1111/1467-9280.00402.
10
Human mate poaching: tactics and tempations for infiltrating existing mateships.人类配偶掠夺:渗透现有伴侣关系的策略与诱惑。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2001 Jun;80(6):894-917. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.80.6.894.