De Smedt Johan, De Cruz Helen
Department of Philosophy and Ethics, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
Evol Psychol. 2010 Nov 28;8(4):695-719. doi: 10.1177/147470491000800411.
This paper examines explanations for human artistic behavior in two reductionist research programs, cognitive neuroscience and evolutionary psychology. Despite their different methodological outlooks, both approaches converge on an explanation of art production and appreciation as byproducts of normal perceptual and motivational cognitive skills that evolved in response to problems originally not related to art, such as the discrimination of salient visual stimuli and speech sounds. The explanatory power of this reductionist framework does not obviate the need for higher-level accounts of art from the humanities, such as aesthetics, art history or anthropology of art.
本文考察了认知神经科学和进化心理学这两个还原论研究项目中对人类艺术行为的解释。尽管它们的方法论观点不同,但这两种方法都趋向于将艺术创作和欣赏解释为正常感知和动机认知技能的副产品,这些技能是为应对最初与艺术无关的问题(如区分显著视觉刺激和语音)而进化出来的。这种还原论框架的解释力并不排除从人文学科(如美学、艺术史或艺术人类学)对艺术进行更高级别阐释的必要性。