Seeley William P
Visiting Scholar, Department of Psychology, Boston College, Boston, MA, United States.
Prog Brain Res. 2018;237:437-453. doi: 10.1016/bs.pbr.2018.03.006. Epub 2018 May 10.
It has recently been suggested that research in neuroscience of art has failed to bring art into focus in the laboratory. Two general arguments are brought to bear in the regard. The common perceptual mechanisms argument observes that neuroscientists working within this field develop models to explain art relative to the ways that artworks are fine-tuned to the operations of perceptual systems. However, these perceptual explanations apply equally to how viewers come to recognize and understand art and nonart objects and events. Therefore these explanations fail to disambiguate artworks from other things. They fail to locate art. This observation points to a deeper problem. What interests us in art is how what we perceive has been used to show us what the work represents. Our understanding of art is governed by a range of productive and evaluative normative conventions that govern how we ought to look at a work and evaluate how it was made. The normative dimension of appreciation argument suggests that these aspects of our engagement with artworks lie outside the scope of neuroscientific explanations of art. This chapter provides a sketch of a diagnostic recognition framework for engaging art that resolves both problems and helps explains how artworks function within the social institution of the artworld to facilitate a communicative exchange between artists and consumers.
最近有人指出,艺术神经科学的研究未能在实验室中将艺术聚焦。对此提出了两个一般性论点。共同感知机制论点指出,在这一领域工作的神经科学家构建模型,以根据艺术作品如何针对感知系统的运作进行微调的方式来解释艺术。然而,这些感知解释同样适用于观众如何识别和理解艺术及非艺术对象与事件。因此,这些解释无法区分艺术作品与其他事物。它们未能定位艺术。这一观察指向一个更深层次的问题。我们在艺术中感兴趣的是我们所感知的内容如何被用来向我们展示作品所代表的东西。我们对艺术的理解受一系列生产性和评价性规范惯例的支配,这些惯例规定了我们应该如何看待一件作品以及如何评价它的创作方式。鉴赏的规范性维度论点表明,我们与艺术作品互动的这些方面超出了神经科学对艺术解释的范围。本章概述了一个用于鉴赏艺术的诊断识别框架,该框架解决了这两个问题,并有助于解释艺术作品如何在艺术界的社会机构中发挥作用,以促进艺术家与消费者之间的交流。