Ochsner Medical Center, New Orleans, Louisiana 70121, USA.
J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs. 2012 Nov-Dec;39(6):607-12. doi: 10.1097/WON.0b013e31826a4b5c.
The purpose of this study was to evaluate an algorithm designed to assess and document pressure ulcers (PUs) via a computerized clinical decision support (CCDS) system.
This study was conducted at Ochsner Medical Center, a 500-bed regional referral hospital. Thirty-one nurses, including RNs, LPNs, and student nurses, volunteered to participate in the study.
The purpose of this descriptive study was to evaluate CCDS, a new tool for PU documentation, in a computer classroom setting. The CCDS program was built as an algorithm based on National Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel's definitions. The CCDS incorporates descriptions in drop-down menus with required selections in depth, color, and characteristics of the PU by the nurse. The computer program then assigns a PU stage. Each participant used the decision support program to document the characteristics of 5 PUs presented in photographs and determine the stage. Data were analyzed to determine the accuracy of nurses' staging compared to that of the researcher and to test for differences between PU groups (overall accuracy, accuracy in accepting CCDS suggestion, and accuracy when override function used).
The results indicate that nurses overall accurately staged PUs 64% of the time when using the CCDS program. However, nurses were significantly more accurate in staging suspected deep tissue injury and stage I PUs when they accepted the CCDS staging versus overriding the suggested stage (P < .01). Bivariate analysis did not identify any association between nurses' characteristics and accuracy in PU staging for suspected deep tissue injury, unstageable ulcers, and stages I and III (P > .05).
Study findings suggest that the use of the CCDS may improve nurses' ability to stage PUs accurately. The correct staging of a PU is imperative in nursing's documentation and subsequent choice of best practices for improved outcomes.
本研究旨在评估一种通过计算机临床决策支持 (CCDS) 系统评估和记录压疮 (PU) 的算法。
本研究在奥克斯纳医疗中心进行,该中心是一家拥有 500 张床位的区域转诊医院。31 名护士,包括注册护士、执业护士和护生,自愿参加了这项研究。
本描述性研究的目的是在计算机教室环境中评估 CCDS,这是一种用于 PU 记录的新工具。CCDS 程序是作为一个基于国家压疮咨询小组定义的算法构建的。CCDS 通过护士在下拉菜单中进行描述,并对 PU 的深度、颜色和特征进行必要的选择。然后,计算机程序会分配一个 PU 阶段。每个参与者都使用决策支持程序记录 5 张照片中呈现的 PU 特征,并确定阶段。对数据进行分析,以确定与研究人员相比,护士的分期准确性,并测试 PU 组之间的差异(总体准确性、接受 CCDS 建议的准确性和使用覆盖功能时的准确性)。
结果表明,护士在使用 CCDS 程序时,总体上准确分期的 PU 占 64%。然而,当护士接受 CCDS 分期而不是覆盖建议的分期时,他们在分期疑似深部组织损伤和 I 期 PU 方面的准确性显著提高(P<0.01)。双变量分析未发现护士特征与疑似深部组织损伤、无法分期溃疡以及 I 期和 III 期 PU 分期准确性之间存在任何关联(P>0.05)。
研究结果表明,使用 CCDS 可能会提高护士准确分期 PU 的能力。正确分期 PU 对护理记录和随后选择最佳实践以改善结果至关重要。