• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

果敢社区治疗中的团队合作(TACT)量表:编制与验证。

The teamwork in assertive community treatment (TACT) scale: development and validation.

机构信息

Division of Health Policy and Management, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, MMC 729, 420 Delaware St., S.W., Minneapolis, MN 55455-0392, USA.

出版信息

Psychiatr Serv. 2012 Nov;63(11):1108-17. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.201100338.

DOI:10.1176/appi.ps.201100338
PMID:22948786
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Team design is meticulously specified for assertive community treatment (ACT) teams, yet performance can vary across ACT teams, even those with high fidelity. By developing and validating the Teamwork in Assertive Community Treatment (TACT) scale, investigators examined the role of team processes in ACT performance.

METHODS

The TACT scale measuring ACT teamwork was developed from a conceptual model grounded in organizational research and adapted for the ACT and mental health context. TACT subscales were constructed after exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses. The reliability, discriminant validity, predictive validity, temporal stability, internal consistency, and within-team agreement were established with surveys from approximately 300 members of 26 Minnesota ACT teams who completed the questionnaire three times, at six-month intervals.

RESULTS

Nine TACT subscales emerged from the analyses: exploration, exploitation of new and existing knowledge, psychological safety, goal agreement, conflict, constructive controversy, information accessibility, encounter preparedness, and consumer-centered care. These nine subscales demonstrated fit and temporal stability (confirmatory factor analysis), high internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha), and within-team agreement and between-team differences (rwg and intraclass correlations). Correlational analyses of the subscales revealed that they measure related yet distinctive aspects of ACT team processes, and regression analyses demonstrated predictive validity (encounter preparedness is related to staff outcomes).

CONCLUSIONS

The TACT scale demonstrated high reliability and validity and can be included in research and evaluation of teamwork in ACT and mental health teams.

摘要

目的

团队设计在果断社区治疗 (ACT) 团队中被精心规定,但即使是那些具有高保真度的团队,其表现也可能存在差异。通过开发和验证团队协作在果断社区治疗 (TACT) 量表中的作用,研究人员研究了团队过程在 ACT 表现中的作用。

方法

用于测量 ACT 团队合作的 TACT 量表是从扎根于组织研究的概念模型中开发出来的,并适应了 ACT 和心理健康的背景。在探索性和验证性因素分析之后,构建了 TACT 子量表。通过对大约 26 个明尼苏达州 ACT 团队的 300 名成员进行的调查,在六个月的间隔内进行了三次调查,建立了该量表的可靠性、区分效度、预测效度、时间稳定性、内部一致性和团队内一致性。

结果

从分析中得出了九个 TACT 子量表:探索、新的和现有的知识的利用、心理安全、目标协议、冲突、建设性争议、信息可及性、准备迎接患者和以患者为中心的护理。这九个子量表表现出拟合度和时间稳定性(验证性因素分析)、高内部一致性(Cronbach's alpha)以及团队内的一致性和团队间的差异(rwg 和组内相关系数)。子量表的相关分析表明,它们测量了 ACT 团队过程的相关但独特的方面,回归分析表明了预测效度(准备迎接患者与员工结果相关)。

结论

TACT 量表具有较高的可靠性和有效性,可以纳入 ACT 和心理健康团队中团队合作的研究和评估中。

相似文献

1
The teamwork in assertive community treatment (TACT) scale: development and validation.果敢社区治疗中的团队合作(TACT)量表:编制与验证。
Psychiatr Serv. 2012 Nov;63(11):1108-17. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.201100338.
2
Staff Turnover in Assertive Community Treatment (Act) Teams: The Role of Team Climate.积极社区治疗(ACT)团队中的人员流动:团队氛围的作用。
Adm Policy Ment Health. 2017 Mar;44(2):258-268. doi: 10.1007/s10488-016-0740-7.
3
Development and psychometric evaluation of a new team effectiveness scale for all types of community adult mental health teams: a mixed-methods approach.针对各类社区成人心理健康团队的新型团队效能量表的开发与心理测量评估:一种混合方法研究。
Health Soc Care Community. 2016 May;24(3):309-20. doi: 10.1111/hsc.12203. Epub 2015 Feb 25.
4
Balancing hospital and community treatment: effectiveness of an extended-hours community mental health team in a semi-rural region of australia.平衡医院与社区治疗:澳大利亚半农村地区延长工作时间的社区心理健康团队的成效
Aust J Rural Health. 2003 Aug;11(4):181-6.
5
Development of the assessment for collaborative environments (ACE-15): A tool to measure perceptions of interprofessional "teamness".协作环境评估工具(ACE - 15)的开发:一种衡量跨专业“团队协作感”认知的工具。
J Interprof Care. 2016 May;30(3):288-94. doi: 10.3109/13561820.2015.1137891. Epub 2016 Mar 30.
6
Reflections on.... Occupational therapy and assertive community treatment.关于……职业治疗与积极社区治疗的思考
Can J Occup Ther. 2002 Jun;69(3):153-7. doi: 10.1177/000841740206900305.
7
Encounter Preparedness, Satisfaction, and Performance Effects of Influence in Assertive Community Treatment (ACT) Teams.积极社区治疗(ACT)团队中影响力的遭遇准备、满意度及绩效影响
Adm Policy Ment Health. 2017 Jul;44(4):441-451. doi: 10.1007/s10488-015-0659-4.
8
Development and validation of a new patient experience tool in patients with serious illness.一种针对重症患者的新型患者体验工具的开发与验证
BMC Palliat Care. 2016 Dec 30;15(1):99. doi: 10.1186/s12904-016-0172-x.
9
The development and testing of the nursing teamwork survey.护理团队合作调查的开发与测试。
Nurs Res. 2010 Jan-Feb;59(1):42-50. doi: 10.1097/NNR.0b013e3181c3bd42.
10
Keeping teams together.
Nurs Times. 1999;95(37):48-9.

引用本文的文献

1
Keeping Our ACT Team Together: Supervisory Strategies to Promote Workforce Retention.保持我们的ACT团队团结:促进员工留任的监督策略。
Adm Policy Ment Health. 2025 Jun 29. doi: 10.1007/s10488-025-01458-7.
2
Variables associated with interprofessional collaboration: a comparison between primary healthcare and specialized mental health teams.与跨专业合作相关的变量:初级保健和专门的心理健康团队之间的比较。
BMC Fam Pract. 2020 Jan 8;21(1):4. doi: 10.1186/s12875-019-1076-7.
3
Profiling mental health professionals in relation to perceived interprofessional collaboration on teams.
分析心理健康专业人员在团队中对跨专业协作的认知情况。
SAGE Open Med. 2019 Mar 29;7:2050312119841467. doi: 10.1177/2050312119841467. eCollection 2019.
4
Variables associated with work performance in multidisciplinary mental health teams.多学科心理健康团队中与工作绩效相关的变量。
SAGE Open Med. 2017 Jul 11;5:2050312117719093. doi: 10.1177/2050312117719093. eCollection 2017.