Suppr超能文献

评估 Neuropad 出汗功能测试作为糖尿病和糖尿病前期老年人群多发性神经病的筛查工具:KORA F4 研究。

Evaluation of the Neuropad sudomotor function test as a screening tool for polyneuropathy in the elderly population with diabetes and pre-diabetes: the KORA F4 survey.

机构信息

Institute for Clinical Diabetology, German Diabetes Center at the Heinrich Heine University, Leibniz Center for Diabetes Research, Düsseldorf, Germany.

出版信息

Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2012 Nov;28(8):692-7. doi: 10.1002/dmrr.2340.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Neuropad is a novel indicator test for sudomotor dysfunction, which has not been validated as a screening tool in a population-based study. This study aimed to evaluate the utility of Neuropad as a screening tool for distal symmetric polyneuropathy among elderly subjects with diabetes and pre-diabetes in the general population.

METHODS

Eligible subjects aged 61-82 years (n = 940) from the KORA F4 survey were examined, 201 of whom had diabetes and 231 had pre-diabetes (WHO 1999 criteria). Polyneuropathy was defined by the Michigan Neuropathy Screening Instrument (MNSI) score >3.

RESULTS

Polyneuropathy was diagnosed in 60 (29.9%) subjects with diabetes and in 45 (19.5%) subjects with pre-diabetes, respectively (p = 0.013). The sensitivity and negative predictive value of Neuropad (reading time: 10 min) for the diagnosis of polyneuropathy were moderately high, reaching 76.7% and 78.1% in subjects with diabetes and 57.8% and 76.5% in those with pre-diabetes, respectively. Conversely, the specificity and positive predictive value for the diagnosis of polyneuropathy were rather low: 35.5% and 33.6% in diabetic individuals and 33.3% and 17.3% in subjects with pre-diabetes, respectively. Use of the >2 cut-off and MNSI combined with monofilament examination did not improve the diagnostic performance of Neuropad.

CONCLUSIONS

In the elderly general population with diabetes and pre-diabetes, Neuropad has reasonable sensitivity but rather low specificity for the diagnosis of polyneuropathy. It is a useful simple and inexpensive tool to screen for and to exclude polyneuropathy as desired, while its low specificity implies that a longer reading time merits consideration.

摘要

背景

Neuropad 是一种新的自主神经功能障碍指标检测工具,尚未在基于人群的研究中被验证为筛查工具。本研究旨在评估 Neuropad 在一般人群中作为糖尿病和糖尿病前期老年受试者远端对称性多发性神经病筛查工具的效用。

方法

KORA F4 研究中对 940 名年龄在 61-82 岁的合格受试者进行了检查,其中 201 名患有糖尿病,231 名患有糖尿病前期(1999 年 WHO 标准)。采用密歇根神经病变筛查工具(MNSI)评分>3 定义为多发性神经病。

结果

糖尿病患者中 60 例(29.9%)和糖尿病前期患者中 45 例(19.5%)诊断为多发性神经病(p=0.013)。Neuropad(阅读时间:10 分钟)对糖尿病患者多发性神经病的诊断具有中等偏高的灵敏度和阴性预测值,分别为 76.7%和 78.1%,对糖尿病前期患者的灵敏度和阴性预测值分别为 57.8%和 76.5%。相反,Neuropad 对多发性神经病的诊断具有较低的特异性和阳性预测值:糖尿病患者分别为 35.5%和 33.6%,糖尿病前期患者分别为 33.3%和 17.3%。使用>2 截断值和结合单丝检查的 MNSI 并未提高 Neuropad 的诊断性能。

结论

在患有糖尿病和糖尿病前期的老年一般人群中,Neuropad 对多发性神经病的诊断具有合理的灵敏度,但特异性较低。它是一种有用的简单且经济的工具,可根据需要进行筛查和排除多发性神经病,但其较低的特异性意味着需要考虑更长的阅读时间。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验