• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

不同误解的共同起源:认知原则与生物学思维的发展。

Common origins of diverse misconceptions: cognitive principles and the development of biology thinking.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Northeastern University, Boston, MA 02115-5000, USA.

出版信息

CBE Life Sci Educ. 2012 Fall;11(3):209-15. doi: 10.1187/cbe.12-06-0074.

DOI:10.1187/cbe.12-06-0074
PMID:22949417
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3433289/
Abstract

Many ideas in the biological sciences seem especially difficult to understand, learn, and teach successfully. Our goal in this feature is to explore how these difficulties may stem not from the complexity or opacity of the concepts themselves, but from the fact that they may clash with informal, intuitive, and deeply held ways of understanding the world that have been studied for decades by psychologists. We give a brief overview of the field of developmental cognitive psychology. Then, in each of the following sections, we present a number of common challenges faced by students in the biological sciences. These may be in the form of misconceptions, biases, or simply concepts that are difficult to learn and teach, and they occur at all levels of biological analysis (molecular, cellular, organismal, population, and ecosystem). We then introduce the notion of a cognitive construal and discuss specific examples of how these cognitive principles may explain what makes some misconceptions so alluring and some biological concepts so challenging for undergraduates. We will argue that seemingly unrelated misconceptions may have common origins in a single underlying cognitive construal. These ideas emerge from our own ongoing cross-disciplinary conversation, and we think that expanding this conversation to include other biological scientists and educators, as well as other cognitive scientists, could have significant utility in improving biology teaching and learning.

摘要

许多生物学科学领域的概念似乎特别难以理解、学习和成功教授。我们在这个专题中的目标是探讨这些困难可能不是源于概念本身的复杂性或不透明性,而是源于这些概念可能与心理学家几十年来研究的非正式、直观和根深蒂固的理解世界的方式相冲突。我们简要概述了发展认知心理学领域。然后,在以下每个部分中,我们提出了生物学专业学生在学习过程中经常遇到的一些共同挑战。这些挑战可能表现为误解、偏见,或者只是难以学习和教授的概念,它们出现在生物分析的所有层面(分子、细胞、个体、种群和生态系统)。接着,我们引入了认知构建的概念,并讨论了这些认知原则如何解释某些误解为何如此诱人,以及某些生物学概念为何对本科生如此具有挑战性。我们将论证看似不相关的误解可能源于单一的底层认知构建。这些想法源自我们自己正在进行的跨学科对话,我们认为,将这种对话扩展到包括其他生物学科学家和教育工作者以及其他认知科学家,可能会对改善生物学教学和学习产生重大作用。

相似文献

1
Common origins of diverse misconceptions: cognitive principles and the development of biology thinking.不同误解的共同起源:认知原则与生物学思维的发展。
CBE Life Sci Educ. 2012 Fall;11(3):209-15. doi: 10.1187/cbe.12-06-0074.
2
Relations between intuitive biological thinking and biological misconceptions in biology majors and nonmajors.生物学专业和非专业学生中直观生物学思维与生物学错误概念之间的关系。
CBE Life Sci Educ. 2015 Mar 2;14(1):ar8. doi: 10.1187/cbe.14-06-0094.
3
Misconceptions are "so yesterday!".误解已经是过去式了!
CBE Life Sci Educ. 2013 Fall;12(3):352-6. doi: 10.1187/cbe.13-01-0014.
4
Cognitive Construal-Consistent Instructor Language in the Undergraduate Biology Classroom.本科生物学课堂中的认知构建一致的教师语言。
CBE Life Sci Educ. 2019 Dec;18(4):ar63. doi: 10.1187/cbe.19-04-0076.
5
Challenging Cognitive Construals: A Dynamic Alternative to Stable Misconceptions.挑战认知建构:一种动态的替代稳定误解的方法。
CBE Life Sci Educ. 2018 Jun;17(2):ar34. doi: 10.1187/cbe.17-10-0214.
6
Exploring undergraduates' understanding of photosynthesis using diagnostic question clusters.运用诊断性问题群探究大学生对光合作用的理解。
CBE Life Sci Educ. 2012 Spring;11(1):47-57. doi: 10.1187/cbe.11-07-0054.
7
Transfer: A Review for Biology and the Life Sciences.转移:生物学和生命科学综述。
CBE Life Sci Educ. 2020 Sep;19(3):es9. doi: 10.1187/cbe.19-11-0227.
8
Biology undergraduates' misconceptions about genetic drift.生物学专业本科生对遗传漂变的误解。
CBE Life Sci Educ. 2012 Fall;11(3):248-59. doi: 10.1187/cbe.11-12-0107.
9
A Biology Core Concept Instrument (BCCI) to Teach and Assess Student Conceptual Understanding.生物学核心概念工具(BCCI)用于教授和评估学生的概念理解。
CBE Life Sci Educ. 2019 Sep;18(3):ar46. doi: 10.1187/cbe.18-09-0192.
10
Design-Based Research: A Methodology to Extend and Enrich Biology Education Research.设计研究:拓展和丰富生物学教育研究的方法。
CBE Life Sci Educ. 2020 Sep;19(3):es11. doi: 10.1187/cbe.19-11-0245.

引用本文的文献

1
Introducing CACIE: Development of the first Conceptual Assessment of Children's Ideas about Evolution.介绍CACIE:首个儿童进化观念概念评估的开发。
PLoS One. 2025 Sep 3;20(9):e0331380. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0331380. eCollection 2025.
2
How cultural input shapes the development of idealized biological prototypes.文化输入如何塑造理想化生物原型的发展。
J Cogn Dev. 2025;26(2):221-249. doi: 10.1080/15248372.2024.2409680. Epub 2024 Nov 4.
3
"I Have No Idea What's in It!"-A Qualitative Study of Adolescents' Conceptions of Milk Alternatives.“我不知道里面有什么!”——一项关于青少年对牛奶替代品认知的定性研究
Food Sci Nutr. 2025 May 20;13(5):e70259. doi: 10.1002/fsn3.70259. eCollection 2025 May.
4
Spontaneous Anthropocentric Language Use in University Students' Explanations of Biological Concepts Varies by Topic and Predicts Misconception Agreement.大学生在解释生物学概念时自发使用以人类为中心的语言因主题而异,并预测错误概念的一致性。
CBE Life Sci Educ. 2025 Mar 1;24(1):ar11. doi: 10.1187/cbe.24-07-0198.
5
Self-regulatory and metacognitive instruction regarding student conceptions: influence on students' self-efficacy and cognitive load.关于学生概念的自我调节和元认知指导:对学生自我效能感和认知负荷的影响。
Front Psychol. 2024 Oct 22;15:1450947. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1450947. eCollection 2024.
6
"It let me merge my love of teaching with research": A qualitative investigation of the career pathways of biology education researchers.“它让我能够将对教学的热爱与研究相结合”:对生物学教育研究人员职业道路的定性研究。
PLoS One. 2024 Oct 17;19(10):e0312243. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0312243. eCollection 2024.
7
Promoting student interest in plant biology through an inquiry-based module exploring plant circadian rhythm, gene expression, and defense against insects.通过一个基于探究的模块来促进学生对植物生物学的兴趣,该模块探索植物昼夜节律、基因表达和对昆虫的防御。
J Microbiol Biol Educ. 2024 Apr 25;25(1):e0016623. doi: 10.1128/jmbe.00166-23. Epub 2024 Jan 31.
8
Understanding how personality traits, experiences, and attitudes shape negative bias toward AI-generated artworks.理解人格特质、经历和态度如何塑造对人工智能生成艺术作品的负面偏见。
Sci Rep. 2024 Feb 19;14(1):4113. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-54294-4.
9
Developing Student Expertise in Evolution: Cognitive Construals Complement Key Concepts in Student Representations.发展学生的进化专长:认知构建补充学生表现中的关键概念。
CBE Life Sci Educ. 2024 Mar;23(1):ar9. doi: 10.1187/cbe.23-06-0109.
10
Changing colors and understanding: the use of mutant chromogenic protein and informational suppressor strains of to explore the central dogma of molecular biology.颜色变化与理解:利用突变生色蛋白和信息抑制菌株探索分子生物学的中心法则
J Microbiol Biol Educ. 2023 Oct 25;24(3). doi: 10.1128/jmbe.00094-23. eCollection 2023 Dec.

本文引用的文献

1
Where the wild things are: informal experience and ecological reasoning.《荒野的呼唤:非正式体验与生态推理》
Child Dev. 2012 May-Jun;83(3):992-1006. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2012.01751.x. Epub 2012 Mar 30.
2
A diagnostic assessment for introductory molecular and cell biology.入门分子与细胞生物学的诊断评估。
CBE Life Sci Educ. 2010 Winter;9(4):453-61. doi: 10.1187/cbe.10-04-0055.
3
Boys will be boys; cows will be cows: children's essentialist reasoning about gender categories and animal species.男孩就是男孩,奶牛就是奶牛:儿童对性别类别和动物物种的本质主义推理。
Child Dev. 2009 Mar-Apr;80(2):461-81. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2009.01272.x.
4
The human function compunction: teleological explanation in adults.人类功能的内疚感:成年人的目的论解释
Cognition. 2009 Apr;111(1):138-43. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2009.01.001. Epub 2009 Feb 5.
5
The Genetics Concept Assessment: a new concept inventory for gauging student understanding of genetics.《遗传学概念评估》:一种用于衡量学生对遗传学理解的新概念量表。
CBE Life Sci Educ. 2008 Winter;7(4):422-30. doi: 10.1187/cbe.08-08-0045.
6
Assessing students' ability to trace matter in dynamic systems in cell biology.评估学生追踪细胞生物学动态系统中物质的能力。
CBE Life Sci Educ. 2006 Winter;5(4):323-31. doi: 10.1187/cbe.06-02-0142.
7
Qualitative differences between naïve and scientific theories of evolution.朴素进化论与科学进化论之间的质的差异。
Cogn Psychol. 2006 Mar;52(2):170-94. doi: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2005.10.001. Epub 2005 Dec 6.
8
Why essences are essential in the psychology of concepts.为什么本质在概念心理学中至关重要。
Cognition. 2001 Nov;82(1):59-69. doi: 10.1016/s0010-0277(01)00145-7.
9
Why are rocks pointy? Children's preference for teleological explanations of the natural world.为什么岩石是尖的?儿童对自然界目的论解释的偏好。
Dev Psychol. 1999 Nov;35(6):1440-52. doi: 10.1037//0012-1649.35.6.1440.
10
The scope of teleological thinking in preschool children.学龄前儿童目的论思维的范围
Cognition. 1999 Apr 1;70(3):241-72. doi: 10.1016/s0010-0277(99)00010-4.