• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

当生物技术实验伙伴的学术水平不同时,学生的学习成果和态度。

Student learning outcomes and attitudes when biotechnology lab partners are of different academic levels.

机构信息

Biotechnology Program and Department of Plant Biology, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695, USA.

出版信息

CBE Life Sci Educ. 2012 Fall;11(3):323-32. doi: 10.1187/cbe.11-10-0094.

DOI:10.1187/cbe.11-10-0094
PMID:22949428
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3433304/
Abstract

The North Carolina State University Biotechnology Program offers laboratory-intensive courses to both undergraduate and graduate students. In "Manipulation and Expression of Recombinant DNA," students are separated into undergraduate and graduate sections for the laboratory, but not the lecture, component. Evidence has shown that students prefer pairing with someone of the same academic level. However, retention of main ideas in peer learning environments has been shown to be greater when partners have dissimilar abilities. Therefore, we tested the hypothesis that there will be enhanced student learning when lab partners are of different academic levels. We found that learning outcomes were met by both levels of student, regardless of pairing. Average undergraduate grades on every assessment method increased when undergraduates were paired with graduate students. Many of the average graduate student grades also increased modestly when graduate students were paired with undergraduates. Attitudes toward working with partners dramatically shifted toward favoring working with students of different academic levels. This work suggests that offering dual-level courses in which different-level partnerships are created does not inhibit learning by students of different academic levels. This format is useful for institutions that wish to offer "boutique" courses in which student enrollment may be low, but specialized equipment and faculty expertise are needed.

摘要

北卡罗来纳州立大学生物技术项目为本科生和研究生提供实验室密集型课程。在“重组 DNA 的操作和表达”这门课程中,学生们在实验室部分被分为本科生和研究生组,但讲座部分则不是。有证据表明,学生更喜欢与同水平的人搭档。然而,在同伴学习环境中,当合作伙伴具有不同的能力时,对主要思想的保留程度更高。因此,我们测试了一个假设,即当实验伙伴具有不同的学术水平时,学生的学习效果会增强。我们发现,无论配对如何,两个层次的学生都达到了学习目标。当本科生与研究生配对时,每个评估方法的本科生平均成绩都有所提高。当研究生与本科生配对时,许多研究生的平均成绩也略有提高。与合作伙伴合作的态度发生了巨大转变,更倾向于与不同学术水平的学生合作。这项工作表明,提供创建不同层次合作关系的双层次课程并不会抑制不同层次学生的学习。这种模式对于那些希望开设“精品”课程的机构很有用,这些课程的学生人数可能较少,但需要专门的设备和教师专业知识。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d0af/3433304/1a43c2d144fb/323fig6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d0af/3433304/4a40ca68405d/323fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d0af/3433304/db394866992b/323fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d0af/3433304/c3cb1ac47e35/323fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d0af/3433304/bb8ee229bea2/323fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d0af/3433304/87850219c52e/323fig5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d0af/3433304/1a43c2d144fb/323fig6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d0af/3433304/4a40ca68405d/323fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d0af/3433304/db394866992b/323fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d0af/3433304/c3cb1ac47e35/323fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d0af/3433304/bb8ee229bea2/323fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d0af/3433304/87850219c52e/323fig5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d0af/3433304/1a43c2d144fb/323fig6.jpg

相似文献

1
Student learning outcomes and attitudes when biotechnology lab partners are of different academic levels.当生物技术实验伙伴的学术水平不同时,学生的学习成果和态度。
CBE Life Sci Educ. 2012 Fall;11(3):323-32. doi: 10.1187/cbe.11-10-0094.
2
Assessment of a novel group-centered testing schema in an upper-level undergraduate molecular biotechnology course.在本科高年级分子生物技术课程中对一种新型的小组集中测试模式的评估。
Biochem Mol Biol Educ. 2013 Jul-Aug;41(4):232-41. doi: 10.1002/bmb.20701.
3
Implementation of the peer-led team-learning instructional model as a stopgap measure improves student achievement for students opting out of laboratory.将同伴主导的团队学习教学模式作为权宜之计加以实施,可提高选择不参加实验的学生的学业成绩。
CBE Life Sci Educ. 2015 Mar 2;14(1):ar2. doi: 10.1187/cbe.13-08-0168. Epub 2015 Feb 11.
4
A contemporary, laboratory-intensive course on messenger RNA transcription and processing.一门关于信使核糖核酸转录与加工的现代实验密集型课程。
Biochem Mol Biol Educ. 2012 Mar-Apr;40(2):89-99. doi: 10.1002/bmb.20580. Epub 2011 Dec 12.
5
Dissection versus Prosection: A Comparative Assessment of the Course Experiences, Approaches to Learning, and Academic Performance of Non-medical Undergraduate Students in Human Anatomy.解剖与尸检:非医学专业本科生人体解剖学课程体验、学习方法和学业成绩的比较评估。
Anat Sci Educ. 2021 Mar;14(2):184-200. doi: 10.1002/ase.1993. Epub 2020 Jul 11.
6
Improved Student Learning through a Faculty Learning Community: How Faculty Collaboration Transformed a Large-Enrollment Course from Lecture to Student Centered.通过教师学习社区提升学生学习效果:教师协作如何将一门大班课程从以讲座为主转变为以学生为中心。
CBE Life Sci Educ. 2016 Summer;15(2). doi: 10.1187/cbe.14-07-0112.
7
Student Learning Outcomes and Attitudes Using Three Methods of Group Formation in a Nonmajors Biology Class.非专业生物学班中三种分组方法对学生学习成果和态度的影响。
CBE Life Sci Educ. 2018 Dec;17(4):ar60. doi: 10.1187/cbe.17-12-0283.
8
Immunological tools: engaging students in the use and analysis of flow cytometry and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA).免疫学工具:让学生参与流式细胞术和酶联免疫吸附测定(ELISA)的使用与分析。
Biochem Mol Biol Educ. 2014 Sep-Oct;42(5):382-97. doi: 10.1002/bmb.20808. Epub 2014 Jul 23.
9
Alternative Realities: Faculty and Student Perceptions of Instructional Practices in Laboratory Courses.另类现实:教师与学生对实验课程教学实践的看法
CBE Life Sci Educ. 2016 winter;15(4). doi: 10.1187/cbe.16-03-0139.
10
Feasibility and outcomes of paid undergraduate student nurse positions.本科护生带薪岗位的可行性与结果
Nurs Leadersh (Tor Ont). 2006 Sep;19(3):e1-14. doi: 10.12927/cjnl.2006.19032.

引用本文的文献

1
Demographic isolation and attitudes toward group work in student-selected lab groups.学生自选实验小组中的人口隔离与团队工作态度。
PLoS One. 2024 Sep 24;19(9):e0310918. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0310918. eCollection 2024.
2
Forming Groups in a Large-Enrollment Biology Class: Group Permanence Matters More than Group Size.在大型生物学课中分组:组的稳定性比组的大小更重要。
CBE Life Sci Educ. 2023 Dec;22(4):ar37. doi: 10.1187/cbe.22-08-0172.
3
Undergraduates' Experiences with Online and in-Person Courses Provide Opportunities for Improving Student-Centered Biology Laboratory Instruction.

本文引用的文献

1
A laboratory-intensive course on the experimental study of protein-protein interactions.一门关于蛋白质-蛋白质相互作用实验研究的高度依赖实验室操作的课程。
Biochem Mol Biol Educ. 2011 Jul;39(4):300-8. doi: 10.1002/bmb.20506.
2
Combining peer discussion with instructor explanation increases student learning from in-class concept questions.同伴讨论与教师讲解相结合能提高学生课堂概念问题学习效果。
CBE Life Sci Educ. 2011 Spring;10(1):55-63. doi: 10.1187/cbe.10-08-0101.
3
A laboratory-intensive course on RNA interference and model organisms.
本科生在线课程和面对面课程的经历为改进以学生为中心的生物学实验室教学提供了机会。
J Microbiol Biol Educ. 2022 Apr 7;23(1). doi: 10.1128/jmbe.00289-21. eCollection 2022 Apr.
4
Student Learning Outcomes and Attitudes Using Three Methods of Group Formation in a Nonmajors Biology Class.非专业生物学班中三种分组方法对学生学习成果和态度的影响。
CBE Life Sci Educ. 2018 Dec;17(4):ar60. doi: 10.1187/cbe.17-12-0283.
RNA 干扰与模式生物实验强化课程。
CBE Life Sci Educ. 2009 Winter;8(4):316-25. doi: 10.1187/cbe.09-02-0012.
4
Undergraduate technical skills training guided by student tutors--analysis of tutors' attitudes, tutees' acceptance and learning progress in an innovative teaching model.由学生导师指导的本科技术技能培训——创新教学模式下导师态度、学生接受度及学习进展分析
BMC Med Educ. 2008 Apr 9;8:18. doi: 10.1186/1472-6920-8-18.
5
Learning cell biology as a team: a project-based approach to upper-division cell biology.团队合作学习细胞生物学:一种基于项目的高年级细胞生物学教学方法。
Cell Biol Educ. 2002 Winter;1(4):145-53. doi: 10.1187/cbe.02-03-0006.
6
Adapting a case-based, cooperative learning strategy to a veterinary parasitology laboratory.
J Vet Med Educ. 2002 Fall;29(3):186-92. doi: 10.3138/jvme.29.3.186.