• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

当你不能既吃蛋糕又吃它:一项关于医生在复杂选择情况下的优先事项的研究。

When you can't have the cake and eat it too: a study of medical doctors' priorities in complex choice situations.

机构信息

Uni Rokkan Centre, Bergen, Norway.

出版信息

Soc Sci Med. 2012 Dec;75(11):1964-73. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2012.08.005. Epub 2012 Aug 16.

DOI:10.1016/j.socscimed.2012.08.005
PMID:22951011
Abstract

Available literature provides little insight into medical doctors' prescription choices when they are required to make complex trade-offs between different concerns such as treatment effect, costs, and patient preferences simultaneously. This study investigates this issue. It is based on a Discrete Choice Experiment (DCE) conducted with 571 Norwegian doctors, where the DCE captures preferences for medications described along five dimensions important for both clinical decision-making and prioritisation in the health sector. Although effectiveness is the most important determinant of choice in our study, doctors also put considerable weight on patients' preferences and on avoiding high total costs. The probability of choosing a particular medication increases when doctors have a positive experience with the medication. GPs value high clinical effectiveness less than hospital consultants do. They are also less concerned with patient preferences. For both groups of doctors it turns out that they are willing to make difficult trade-offs between attributes they are often assumed not to be willing to compromise on, like effectiveness or patient preferences, and cost measures - given that they have proper information about these attributes.

摘要

现有文献几乎没有深入探讨当医生需要在治疗效果、成本和患者偏好等不同关注点之间进行复杂权衡时的处方选择。本研究对此进行了调查。该研究基于对 571 名挪威医生进行的离散选择实验 (DCE),DCE 捕捉了对药物的偏好,这些药物沿着对临床决策和卫生部门优先级制定都很重要的五个维度进行描述。尽管在我们的研究中,有效性是选择的最重要决定因素,但医生也非常重视患者的偏好和避免高额总成本。当医生对药物有积极的体验时,选择特定药物的概率会增加。全科医生对高临床疗效的重视程度低于医院顾问。他们也不太关注患者的偏好。对于这两组医生来说,事实证明,只要他们对这些属性有适当的了解,他们愿意在他们通常被认为不愿意妥协的属性(如疗效或患者偏好)和成本措施之间进行艰难的权衡。

相似文献

1
When you can't have the cake and eat it too: a study of medical doctors' priorities in complex choice situations.当你不能既吃蛋糕又吃它:一项关于医生在复杂选择情况下的优先事项的研究。
Soc Sci Med. 2012 Dec;75(11):1964-73. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2012.08.005. Epub 2012 Aug 16.
2
Changes in drug prescribing under the Public Health Reform Law--a survey of general practitioners' attitudes in East and West Germany.《公共卫生改革法》下的药物处方变化——对东德和西德全科医生态度的调查
Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1997 Apr;35(4):164-9.
3
Impact of falling reimbursement rates on physician preferences regarding drug therapy for osteoarthritis using a discrete choice experiment.使用离散选择实验评估报销率下降对医生骨关节炎药物治疗偏好的影响。
Int J Pharm Pract. 2016 Apr;24(2):114-22. doi: 10.1111/ijpp.12220. Epub 2015 Sep 18.
4
Influence exerted on drug prescribing by patients' attitudes and expectations and by doctors' perception of such expectations: a cohort and nested case-control study.患者态度与期望以及医生对这些期望的认知对药物处方的影响:一项队列研究和嵌套病例对照研究
J Eval Clin Pract. 2008 Jun;14(3):453-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2007.00901.x. Epub 2008 Mar 24.
5
Do general practitioners know patients' preferences? An empirical study on the agency relationship at an aggregate level using a discrete choice experiment.全科医生了解患者的偏好吗?使用离散选择实验对代理关系进行总体层面的实证研究。
Value Health. 2012 May;15(3):514-23. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2012.01.002. Epub 2012 Feb 16.
6
Preferences of patients and physicians concerning treatment options for relapsed follicular lymphoma: a discrete choice experiment.患者和医生对复发性滤泡性淋巴瘤治疗选择的偏好:一项离散选择实验。
Bone Marrow Transplant. 2011 Jul;46(7):962-9. doi: 10.1038/bmt.2010.225. Epub 2010 Oct 11.
7
Using discrete choice experiment to elicit doctors' preferences for the report card design of diabetes care in Taiwan - a pilot study.运用离散选择实验 eliciting 台湾地区医生对糖尿病照护报告卡设计的偏好- pilot 研究。
J Eval Clin Pract. 2010 Feb;16(1):14-20. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2008.01105.x.
8
A comparison of parents and pediatric anesthesiologists' preferences for attributes of child daycase surgery: a discrete choice experiment.父母与儿科麻醉医生对儿童日间手术属性的偏好比较:一项离散选择实验
Paediatr Anaesth. 2007 Nov;17(11):1043-52. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9592.2007.02271.x.
9
Factors which motivate cancer doctors to involve their patients in reaching treatment decisions.促使癌症医生让患者参与治疗决策的因素。
Patient Educ Couns. 2011 Aug;84(2):229-35. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2010.10.018. Epub 2010 Nov 26.
10
Consumer preferences for health and nonhealth outcomes of health promotion: results from a discrete choice experiment.消费者对健康促进的健康和非健康结果的偏好:来自离散选择实验的结果。
Value Health. 2013 Jan-Feb;16(1):114-23. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2012.08.2211.

引用本文的文献

1
Systematic review and validity assessment of methods used in discrete choice experiments of primary healthcare professionals.基层医疗专业人员离散选择实验中所用方法的系统评价与效度评估
Health Econ Rev. 2020 Dec 9;10(1):39. doi: 10.1186/s13561-020-00295-8.
2
Influence of disease activity on RA treatment choices in countries with restricted access to expensive, innovative drugs: a discrete choice experiment among rheumatologists.疾病活动度对难以获取昂贵创新药物国家中类风湿关节炎治疗选择的影响:风湿病学家的离散选择实验
RMD Open. 2017 Sep 4;3(2):e000453. doi: 10.1136/rmdopen-2017-000453. eCollection 2017.
3
Discrete choice experiments in health economics: a review of the literature.
健康经济学中的离散选择实验:文献综述
Pharmacoeconomics. 2014 Sep;32(9):883-902. doi: 10.1007/s40273-014-0170-x.
4
Education and decision making at the time of triptan prescribing: patient expectations vs actual practice.曲坦类药物处方开具时的教育与决策:患者期望与实际做法
Headache. 2014 Apr;54(4):698-708. doi: 10.1111/head.12308. Epub 2014 Feb 11.