• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

消费者对健康促进的健康和非健康结果的偏好:来自离散选择实验的结果。

Consumer preferences for health and nonhealth outcomes of health promotion: results from a discrete choice experiment.

机构信息

Department of Health Services Research, School for Public Health and Primary Care, Maastricht University, Caphri, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Value Health. 2013 Jan-Feb;16(1):114-23. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2012.08.2211.

DOI:10.1016/j.jval.2012.08.2211
PMID:23337222
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Health promotion (HP) interventions have outcomes that go beyond health. Such broader nonhealth outcomes are usually neglected in economic evaluation studies. To allow for their consideration, insights are needed into the types of nonhealth outcomes that HP interventions produce and their relative importance compared with health outcomes. This study explored consumer preferences for health and nonhealth outcomes of HP in the context of lifestyle behavior change.

METHODS

A discrete choice experiment was conducted among participants in a lifestyle intervention (n = 132) and controls (n = 141). Respondents made 16 binary choices between situations that can be experienced after lifestyle behavior change. The situations were described by 10 attributes: future health state value, start point of future health state, life expectancy, clothing size above ideal, days with sufficient relaxation, endurance, experienced control over lifestyle choices, lifestyle improvement of partner and/or children, monetary cost per month, and time cost per week.

RESULTS

With the exception of "time cost per week" and "start point of future health state," all attributes significantly determined consumer choices. Thus, both health and nonhealth outcomes affected consumer choice. Marginal rates of substitution between the price attribute and the other attributes revealed that the attributes "endurance," "days with sufficient relaxation," and "future health state value" had the greatest impact on consumer choices. The "life expectancy" attribute had a relatively low impact and for increases of less than 3 years, respondents were not willing to trade.

CONCLUSIONS

Health outcomes and nonhealth outcomes of lifestyle behavior change were both important to consumers in this study. Decision makers should respond to consumer preferences and consider nonhealth outcomes when deciding about HP interventions.

摘要

目的

健康促进(HP)干预的结果超出了健康范围。此类更广泛的非健康结果通常在经济评估研究中被忽视。为了能够考虑到这些结果,需要深入了解 HP 干预产生的非健康结果的类型及其与健康结果的相对重要性。本研究探讨了在生活方式行为改变的背景下,消费者对 HP 的健康和非健康结果的偏好。

方法

在生活方式干预(n=132)和对照组(n=141)参与者中进行了离散选择实验。受访者在 16 种生活方式行为改变后可能经历的情况之间做出了 16 种二元选择。这些情况由 10 个属性描述:未来健康状态的价值、未来健康状态的起点、预期寿命、理想尺码以上的服装尺寸、有足够放松的天数、耐力、对生活方式选择的体验控制、伴侣和/或孩子的生活方式改善、每月费用和每周时间成本。

结果

除了“每周时间成本”和“未来健康状态起点”之外,所有属性都显著决定了消费者的选择。因此,健康和非健康结果都影响了消费者的选择。价格属性与其他属性之间的边际替代率表明,属性“耐力”、“有足够放松的天数”和“未来健康状态价值”对消费者选择的影响最大。“预期寿命”属性的影响相对较低,对于低于 3 年的增加,受访者不愿意进行交易。

结论

在这项研究中,生活方式行为改变的健康结果和非健康结果对消费者都很重要。决策者应响应消费者的偏好,并在决定 HP 干预措施时考虑非健康结果。

相似文献

1
Consumer preferences for health and nonhealth outcomes of health promotion: results from a discrete choice experiment.消费者对健康促进的健康和非健康结果的偏好:来自离散选择实验的结果。
Value Health. 2013 Jan-Feb;16(1):114-23. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2012.08.2211.
2
Quality-adjusted life-years lack quality in pediatric care: a critical review of published cost-utility studies in child health.质量调整生命年在儿科护理中缺乏质量:对已发表的儿童健康成本效用研究的批判性综述。
Pediatrics. 2005 May;115(5):e600-14. doi: 10.1542/peds.2004-2127.
3
Patient preferences for psoriasis treatments: process characteristics can outweigh outcome attributes.银屑病治疗的患者偏好:过程特征可能比结果属性更重要。
Arch Dermatol. 2011 Nov;147(11):1285-94. doi: 10.1001/archdermatol.2011.309.
4
Dear policy maker: have you made up your mind? A discrete choice experiment among policy makers and other health professionals.尊敬的决策者:你是否已经下定决心?决策者和其他卫生专业人员之间的离散选择实验。
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2010 Apr;26(2):198-204. doi: 10.1017/S0266462310000048.
5
Exploring non-health outcomes of health promotion: the perspective of participants in a lifestyle behaviour change intervention.探索健康促进的非健康结果:生活方式行为改变干预参与者的观点。
Health Policy. 2012 Jul;106(2):177-86. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2012.04.005. Epub 2012 May 9.
6
Patient preferences for treatment of low back pain-a discrete choice experiment.患者对腰痛治疗的偏好——一项离散选择实验。
Value Health. 2014 Jun;17(4):390-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2014.01.005. Epub 2014 Apr 21.
7
Outcomes of social care for adults: developing a preference-weighted measure.成人社会关怀结局:偏好加权测量的发展。
Health Technol Assess. 2012;16(16):1-166. doi: 10.3310/hta16160.
8
Unravelling the concept of consumer preference: implications for health policy and optimal planning in primary care.解析消费者偏好概念:对初级保健中卫生政策和最优规划的启示。
Health Policy. 2010 Oct;97(2-3):105-12. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2010.04.005. Epub 2010 May 14.
9
Efficiency and equity: a stated preference approach.效率与公平:一种意愿调查法。
Health Econ. 2013 May;22(5):568-81. doi: 10.1002/hec.2827. Epub 2012 Apr 23.
10
The impact of health vs. non-health goals on individuals' lifestyle program choices: a discrete choice experiment approach.健康目标与非健康目标对个体生活方式计划选择的影响:离散选择实验方法。
BMC Public Health. 2020 Mar 30;20(1):411. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-8416-3.

引用本文的文献

1
Preference of primary care patients for home-based healthcare and support services: a discrete choice experiment in China.基层医疗患者对居家医疗保健和支持服务的偏好:中国的一项离散选择实验
Front Public Health. 2024 Apr 18;12:1324776. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1324776. eCollection 2024.
2
mHealth interventions to reduce stress in healthcare workers (fitcor): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.移动医疗干预措施以减少医护人员压力(fitcor):一项随机对照试验的研究方案。
Trials. 2023 Mar 4;24(1):163. doi: 10.1186/s13063-023-07182-7.
3
Efficacy of Individualized Sensory-Based mHealth Interventions to Improve Distress Coping in Healthcare Professionals: A Multi-Arm Parallel-Group Randomized Controlled Trial.
个体化基于感觉的移动健康干预措施对改善医护人员压力应对的效果:一项多臂平行组随机对照试验。
Sensors (Basel). 2023 Feb 19;23(4):2322. doi: 10.3390/s23042322.
4
Methodological issues in economic evaluations of disease prevention and health promotion: an overview of systematic and scoping reviews.疾病预防与健康促进的经济评价方法学问题:系统评价和范围综述概述。
BMC Public Health. 2021 Nov 20;21(1):2130. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-12174-w.
5
Conceptualising 'Benefits Beyond Health' in the Context of the Quality-Adjusted Life-Year: A Critical Interpretive Synthesis.在质量调整生命年背景下对“健康之外的益处”进行概念化:一项批判性解释性综述
Pharmacoeconomics. 2021 Dec;39(12):1383-1395. doi: 10.1007/s40273-021-01074-x. Epub 2021 Aug 23.
6
Ranking of meal preferences and interactions with demographic characteristics: a discrete choice experiment in young adults.饮食偏好排序及与人口特征的相互关系:一项针对青年成年人的离散选择实验。
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2020 Dec 1;17(1):157. doi: 10.1186/s12966-020-01059-7.
7
Towards capability-adjusted life years in public health and social welfare: Results from a Swedish survey on ranking capabilities.迈向公共卫生和社会福利领域的能力调整生命年:一项瑞典关于能力排序的调查结果。
PLoS One. 2020 Dec 1;15(12):e0242699. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0242699. eCollection 2020.
8
Evaluation of a computer-assisted multi-professional intervention to address lifestyle-related risk factors for overweight and obesity in expecting mothers and their infants: protocol for an effectiveness-implementation hybrid study.评估计算机辅助多专业干预措施以解决孕妇及其婴儿超重和肥胖的生活方式相关风险因素:有效性-实施混合研究方案
BMC Public Health. 2020 Apr 15;20(1):482. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-8200-4.
9
The impact of health vs. non-health goals on individuals' lifestyle program choices: a discrete choice experiment approach.健康目标与非健康目标对个体生活方式计划选择的影响:离散选择实验方法。
BMC Public Health. 2020 Mar 30;20(1):411. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-8416-3.
10
Using discrete choice model to elicit preference for health-care priority setting.运用离散选择模型来确定医疗保健资源分配的优先顺序偏好。
J Educ Health Promot. 2019 Jun 27;8:117. doi: 10.4103/jehp.jehp_404_18. eCollection 2019.