• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Education and decision making at the time of triptan prescribing: patient expectations vs actual practice.曲坦类药物处方开具时的教育与决策:患者期望与实际做法
Headache. 2014 Apr;54(4):698-708. doi: 10.1111/head.12308. Epub 2014 Feb 11.
2
Identifying the factors underlying discontinuation of triptans.确定曲坦类药物停药的根本原因。
Headache. 2014 Feb;54(2):278-89. doi: 10.1111/head.12198. Epub 2013 Sep 3.
3
Triptan education and improving knowledge for optimal migraine treatment: an observational study.曲坦类药物教育与改善知识以实现偏头痛的最佳治疗:一项观察性研究。
Headache. 2014 Apr;54(4):686-97. doi: 10.1111/head.12286. Epub 2014 Feb 12.
4
A cross-sectional survey to assess the migraineur's medication decision-making beliefs: determining when a migraine is triptan-worthy.一项评估偏头痛患者药物决策信念的横断面调查:确定何时偏头痛值得使用曲坦类药物。
Headache. 2013 Jul-Aug;53(7):1134-46. doi: 10.1111/head.12140. Epub 2013 Jun 14.
5
[Patterns of prescription and usage of triptans in Alsace (France): misuse is frequent and avoidable].[法国阿尔萨斯地区曲普坦类药物的处方与使用模式:滥用情况频繁且可避免]
Rev Neurol (Paris). 2006 Mar;162(3):347-57. doi: 10.1016/s0035-3787(06)75021-4.
6
Geographic variation in the use of triptans and opioids for the acute treatment of migraine attacks.曲坦类药物和阿片类药物在偏头痛急性发作的治疗中使用的地域差异。
Headache. 2021 Nov;61(10):1499-1510. doi: 10.1111/head.14238. Epub 2021 Nov 28.
7
Post Hoc Subanalysis of Two Randomized, Controlled Phase 3 Trials Evaluating Diclofenac Potassium for Oral Solution: Impact of Migraine-Associated Nausea and Prior Triptan Use on Efficacy.两项评估口服溶液双氯芬酸钾的随机、对照3期试验的事后亚组分析:偏头痛相关性恶心和既往曲坦类药物使用对疗效的影响。
Headache. 2017 May;57(5):756-765. doi: 10.1111/head.13073. Epub 2017 Apr 6.
8
Adding Additional Acute Medications to a Triptan Regimen for Migraine and Observed Changes in Headache-Related Disability: Results From the American Migraine Prevalence and Prevention (AMPP) Study.在曲坦类药物治疗偏头痛方案中添加其他急性药物以及观察到的与头痛相关的残疾变化:美国偏头痛患病率与预防(AMPP)研究的结果
Headache. 2015 Jun;55(6):825-39. doi: 10.1111/head.12556. Epub 2015 Apr 17.
9
A global real-world assessment of the impact on health-related quality of life and work productivity of migraine in patients with insufficient versus good response to triptan medication.在对曲坦类药物治疗反应不足与良好的偏头痛患者进行全球真实世界评估,以了解其对健康相关生活质量和工作生产力的影响。
J Headache Pain. 2020 Apr 29;21(1):41. doi: 10.1186/s10194-020-01110-9.
10
Health care resource utilization following initiation of a triptan: a retrospective claims analysis.曲坦类药物起始治疗后的医疗资源利用情况:一项回顾性理赔分析。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2014 Apr;20(4):368-75. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2014.20.4.368.

引用本文的文献

1
Eptinezumab for the Prevention of Migraine: Clinical Utility, Patient Preferences and Selection - A Narrative Review.依普他命单抗预防偏头痛:临床效用、患者偏好与选择——一篇叙述性综述
Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2023 Nov 23;19:959-971. doi: 10.2147/TCRM.S263824. eCollection 2023.
2
Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Erenumab Versus OnabotulinumtoxinA for Patients with Chronic Migraine Attacks in Greece.依瑞奈玛单抗与肉毒毒素 A 治疗希腊慢性偏头痛发作患者的成本-效果分析。
Clin Drug Investig. 2019 Oct;39(10):979-990. doi: 10.1007/s40261-019-00827-z.
3
Is Reclassification of the Oral Contraceptive Pill from Prescription to Pharmacist-Only Cost Effective? Application of an Economic Evaluation Approach to Regulatory Decisions.将口服避孕药从处方药物改为仅限药剂师调配,是否具有成本效益?基于监管决策的经济评估方法的应用。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2019 Aug;37(8):1049-1064. doi: 10.1007/s40273-019-00804-6.
4
Patients' preferences for headache acute and preventive treatment.患者对头痛急性治疗和预防性治疗的偏好。
J Headache Pain. 2017 Oct 6;18(1):102. doi: 10.1186/s10194-017-0813-3.

本文引用的文献

1
Rates and reasons for discontinuation of triptans and opioids in episodic migraine: results from the American Migraine Prevalence and Prevention (AMPP) study.发作性偏头痛中曲坦类药物和阿片类药物停药率及停药原因:美国偏头痛患病率和预防(AMPP)研究结果。
J Neurol Sci. 2013 Mar 15;326(1-2):10-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jns.2012.12.020. Epub 2013 Feb 8.
2
Barriers to the diagnosis and treatment of migraine: effects of sex, income, and headache features.偏头痛诊断和治疗的障碍:性别、收入和头痛特征的影响。
Headache. 2013 Jan;53(1):81-92. doi: 10.1111/j.1526-4610.2012.02265.x. Epub 2012 Oct 18.
3
When you can't have the cake and eat it too: a study of medical doctors' priorities in complex choice situations.当你不能既吃蛋糕又吃它:一项关于医生在复杂选择情况下的优先事项的研究。
Soc Sci Med. 2012 Dec;75(11):1964-73. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2012.08.005. Epub 2012 Aug 16.
4
Deficits in retention for verbally presented medical information.口头呈现的医学信息记忆缺陷。
Anesthesiology. 2012 Oct;117(4):772-9. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e31826a4b02.
5
Barriers for an effective communication around clinical decision making: an analysis of the gaps between doctors' and patients' point of view.临床决策沟通障碍分析:医生和患者观点之间的差距
Health Expect. 2014 Dec;17(6):826-39. doi: 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2012.00809.x. Epub 2012 Aug 17.
6
Effects of depression and social support on comprehension and recall of informed consent information among Parkinson disease patients and their caregivers.抑郁和社会支持对帕金森病患者及其照顾者理解和回忆知情同意信息的影响。
Int J Psychiatry Med. 2012;43(1):67-83. doi: 10.2190/PM.43.1.e.
7
Factors associated with triptan use in episodic migraine: results from the American Migraine Prevalence and Prevention Study.与发作性偏头痛中曲坦类药物使用相关的因素:来自美国偏头痛患病率和预防研究的结果。
Headache. 2012 Feb;52(2):213-23. doi: 10.1111/j.1526-4610.2011.02032.x.
8
How well informed are patients when leaving the emergency department? comparing information provided and information retained.患者离开急诊部时了解多少?比较提供的信息和保留的信息。
Emerg Med J. 2013 Jan;30(1):53-7. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2011-200451. Epub 2012 Mar 12.
9
What factors affect patients' recall of general practitioners' advice?哪些因素会影响患者对全科医生建议的记忆?
BMC Fam Pract. 2011 Dec 28;12:141. doi: 10.1186/1471-2296-12-141.
10
The association between functional health literacy and patient-reported recall of medications at outpatient pharmacies.门诊药房中功能性健康素养与患者药物记忆报告之间的关联。
Res Social Adm Pharm. 2012 Jul-Aug;8(4):349-54. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2011.08.001. Epub 2011 Dec 1.

曲坦类药物处方开具时的教育与决策:患者期望与实际做法

Education and decision making at the time of triptan prescribing: patient expectations vs actual practice.

作者信息

Mathew Paul G, Pavlovic Jelena M, Lettich Alyssa, Wells Rebecca E, Robertson Carrie E, Mullin Kathleen, Charleston Iv Larry, Dodick David W, Schwedt Todd J

机构信息

Department of Neurology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, John R. Graham Headache Center, Boston, MA, USA; Cambridge Health Alliance, Division of Neurology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.

出版信息

Headache. 2014 Apr;54(4):698-708. doi: 10.1111/head.12308. Epub 2014 Feb 11.

DOI:10.1111/head.12308
PMID:24512184
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4224268/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Optimizing patient satisfaction with their medical care and maximizing patient adherence with treatment plans requires an understanding of patient preferences regarding education and their role in decision making when treatments are prescribed.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the congruence between patient expectations and actual practice regarding education and decision making at the time a triptan is prescribed.

METHODS

This multicenter cross-sectional survey was performed by headache fellow members of the American Headache Society Headache Fellows Research Consortium at their respective tertiary care headache clinics. Migraine patients who were new patients to the headache clinic and who were current triptan users (use within prior 3 months and for ≥1 year) or past triptan users (no use within 6 months; prior use within 2 years) completed questionnaires that assessed the education they received and their role in decision making at the time a triptan was first prescribed as well as their desire for education and participation in decision making when a triptan is prescribed.

RESULTS

Consistent with patient preference, most participants received the majority of their education about the triptan from the prescriber's office (70.2%). In descending rank order, participants most desired to be informed about how to decide if a triptan should be taken, when during the course of migraine a triptan should be taken, possible side effects, cost, and how to obtain refills. Regarding side effects, most participants preferred to receive education about the most common side effects of a triptan rather than addressing all possible side effects. Regarding triptan dosing, participants desired to be informed in descending order of importance about taking other medications with triptans, how many doses can be taken for each migraine, how many doses can be taken each week/month, what to do if the triptan does not work, and the triptan mechanism of action. The vast majority of participants (92%) preferred that the decision to prescribe a triptan be a joint decision between the patient and the provider. In actual practice, participants were not as involved in decision making as they would like to be, with patients reporting that the prescriber was the sole decision maker 55.1% of the time. Participants had confidence in their providers (87.7%) and generally felt they did a good job educating them about the triptan (71.1%).

CONCLUSIONS

Based on this study, it is clear that patients prefer the shared model approach to medical decision making in regards to the prescription of triptans. The majority of patients received education that was generally consistent with their desires. Patients preferred that the prescribing provider be the primary source of information. The most desired educational topics included when/if a triptan should be taken, the number of times a triptan can be taken for a single migraine, co-administration with other acute medications, and the most common side effects. Focusing on these topics should enhance patient satisfaction and may improve compliance.

摘要

背景

优化患者对医疗护理的满意度并使患者最大程度地遵守治疗计划,需要了解患者在教育方面的偏好以及他们在开出处方时参与决策的作用。

目的

评估在开具曲坦类药物时患者在教育和决策方面的期望与实际做法之间的一致性。

方法

这项多中心横断面调查由美国头痛协会头痛研究员研究联盟的头痛专科研究员在美国各自的三级头痛护理诊所进行。偏头痛患者为头痛诊所的新患者,且为当前曲坦类药物使用者(在过去3个月内使用且使用时间≥1年)或过去曲坦类药物使用者(在6个月内未使用;在2年内曾使用),他们完成了问卷,评估首次开具曲坦类药物时所接受的教育、他们在决策中的作用,以及开具曲坦类药物时对教育和参与决策的期望。

结果

与患者偏好一致,大多数参与者从开处方医生办公室获得了关于曲坦类药物的大部分教育(70.2%)。按降序排列,参与者最希望了解如何决定是否应服用曲坦类药物、在偏头痛过程中的何时服用曲坦类药物、可能的副作用、费用以及如何获得续方。关于副作用,大多数参与者更喜欢了解曲坦类药物最常见的副作用,而非所有可能的副作用。关于曲坦类药物的剂量,参与者希望按重要性降序了解与其他药物联合使用曲坦类药物的情况、每次偏头痛可服用的剂量、每周/每月可服用的剂量、曲坦类药物无效时该怎么做以及曲坦类药物的作用机制。绝大多数参与者(92%)更希望开具曲坦类药物的决定是患者与医疗服务提供者共同做出的决定。在实际操作中,参与者在决策中的参与程度不如他们期望的那样,患者报告称开处方医生在55.1%的时间里是唯一的决策者。参与者对他们的医疗服务提供者有信心(87.7%),并且总体上感觉医疗服务提供者在向他们介绍曲坦类药物方面做得很好(71.1%)。

结论

基于这项研究,很明显患者在曲坦类药物处方方面更喜欢共同决策的模式。大多数患者接受的教育总体上与他们的期望一致。患者更喜欢开处方的医疗服务提供者作为主要信息来源。最希望了解的教育主题包括何时/是否应服用曲坦类药物、单次偏头痛可服用曲坦类药物的次数、与其他急性药物的联合使用以及最常见的副作用。关注这些主题应能提高患者满意度并可能改善依从性。