Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA 23298, USA.
Med Care Res Rev. 2013 Feb;70(1):84-97. doi: 10.1177/1077558712458158. Epub 2012 Sep 4.
Recent research suggests hospitals serving low-income patients have poorer outcomes. However, safety net hospitals (SNHs) offering access to care regardless of insurance coverage may provide better care than low-income patients would otherwise receive. This study considers the association between insurance and mortality among surgical cancer patients and the role of SNHs. We estimate models of 1- and 5-year mortality on insurance, SNH status, patient characteristics, and hospital surgical volume for colorectal and breast cancer patients. Interaction terms between insurance and SNH status estimate how mortality differs by insurance source at SNHs. Medicaid and uninsurance are associated with significantly higher mortality for colorectal cancer patients. There is a statistically significant improvement in mortality for Medicaid colorectal cancer patients treated in SNHs relative to non-SNHs and a marginally significant improvement for uninsured breast cancer patients treated in SNHs. The results suggest a survival benefit for low-income patients treated in SNHs.
最近的研究表明,为低收入患者服务的医院的治疗效果较差。然而,提供无论保险覆盖范围如何都能获得医疗服务的安全网医院(SNH)可能会提供比低收入患者原本所能获得的更好的治疗。本研究考虑了保险与癌症手术患者的死亡率之间的关系,以及 SNH 的作用。我们针对结直肠癌和乳腺癌患者,估计了 1 年和 5 年死亡率的模型,考虑了保险、SNH 状况、患者特征和医院手术量。保险和 SNH 状态之间的交互项估计了 SNH 处的死亡率如何因保险来源而有所不同。对于结直肠癌患者,医疗补助和无保险与死亡率显著升高相关。在 SNH 处接受治疗的 Medicaid 结直肠癌患者的死亡率有统计学意义上的改善,而在 SNH 处接受治疗的无保险乳腺癌患者的死亡率则略有改善。结果表明,在 SNH 处接受治疗的低收入患者有生存获益。