Coronel Institute of Occupational Health, Academic Medical Center (AMC), University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Scand J Work Environ Health. 2013 Mar 1;39(2):144-54. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.3320. Epub 2012 Sep 5.
OBJECTIVES: In case of long-term sick leave, gradually increasing workload appears to be an effective component of work-directed interventions to reduce sick leave due to common mental disorders (CMD). CMD are defined as stress-related, adjustment, anxiety, or depressive disorders. We developed an exposure-based return-to-work (RTW-E) intervention and evaluated the effect on time-to-full return to work (RTW) among workers who were on sick leave due to CMD in comparison to those treated with care-as-usual (CAU). CAU is guideline-directed and consists of problem-solving strategies and graded activities. METHODS: Using a two-armed cluster-randomized trial, we randomized 56 occupational physicians (OP). Of these, 35 OP treated 160 workers at the start of their sick leave; 75 workers received RTW-E and 85 workers received CAU. These workers were followed over a 12-month follow-up period. The time-to-full RTW lasting ≥28 days without recurrence was the primary outcome measure. To evaluate differences between groups, we used intention-to-treat and multilevel Cox's regression analysis. RESULTS: The median time-to-full RTW differed significantly between groups [hazard ratio (HR) 0.55; 95% confidence interval (95% CI) 0.33-0.89]. The workers receiving RTW-E (209 days; 95% CI 62-256) had a prolonged time-to-full RTW compared to workers receiving CAU (153 days; 95% CI 128-178). CONCLUSIONS: Workers on sick leave due to CMD treated with RTW-E showed a prolonged time-to-full RTW compared to those treated with CAU. We recommend that OP do not apply RTW-E but continue counseling workers on sick leave due to CMD according to CAU.
目的:在长期病假的情况下,逐渐增加工作量似乎是减少因常见精神障碍(CMD)而请病假的工作导向干预的有效组成部分。CMD 被定义为与压力相关的、适应不良的、焦虑或抑郁障碍。我们开发了一种基于暴露的重返工作岗位(RTW-E)干预措施,并评估了其与常规护理(CAU)相比,对因 CMD 而请病假的工人重返工作岗位(RTW)的时间的影响。CAU 是基于指南的,包括解决问题的策略和分级活动。
方法:使用双臂聚类随机试验,我们对 56 名职业医生(OP)进行了随机分组。其中,35 名 OP 在工人开始病假时治疗了 160 名工人;75 名工人接受了 RTW-E,85 名工人接受了 CAU。这些工人在 12 个月的随访期间接受了随访。主要结局指标是无复发持续≥28 天的完全 RTW 时间。为了评估组间差异,我们使用了意向治疗和多级 Cox 回归分析。
结果:组间完全 RTW 的中位时间差异有统计学意义[风险比(HR)0.55;95%置信区间(95%CI)0.33-0.89]。接受 RTW-E 治疗的工人(209 天;95%CI 62-256)的完全 RTW 时间明显长于接受 CAU 治疗的工人(153 天;95%CI 128-178)。
结论:接受 RTW-E 治疗的因 CMD 而请病假的工人与接受 CAU 治疗的工人相比,完全 RTW 的时间延长。我们建议 OP 不要应用 RTW-E,而是继续根据 CAU 为因 CMD 而请病假的工人提供咨询。
Scand J Work Environ Health. 2011-10-27
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015-10-5
Eur J Public Health. 2011-8-11
Scand J Work Environ Health. 2024-1-1
Scand J Prim Health Care. 2022-3
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2021-2-9