Suppr超能文献

一种病例管理式的职业健康模式,以促进 NHS 员工常见精神健康障碍者更早地返回工作岗位:一项可行性研究。

A case management occupational health model to facilitate earlier return to work of NHS staff with common mental health disorders: a feasibility study.

机构信息

Occupational Health Service, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.

Faculty of Life Sciences & Medicine, King's College London, London, UK.

出版信息

Health Technol Assess. 2021 Feb;25(12):1-94. doi: 10.3310/hta25120.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The NHS is the biggest employer in the UK. Depression and anxiety are common reasons for sickness absence among staff. Evidence suggests that an intervention based on a case management model using a biopsychosocial approach could be cost-effective and lead to earlier return to work for staff with common mental health disorders.

OBJECTIVE

The objective was to assess the feasibility and acceptability of conducting a trial of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of an early occupational health referral and case management intervention to facilitate the return to work of NHS staff on sick leave with any common mental health disorder (e.g. depression or anxiety).

DESIGN

A multicentre mixed-methods feasibility study with embedded process evaluation and economic analyses. The study comprised an updated systematic review, survey of care as usual, and development of an intervention in consultation with key stakeholders. Although this was not a randomised controlled trial, the study design comprised two arms where participants received either the intervention or care as usual.

PARTICIPANTS

Participants were NHS staff on sick leave for 7 or more consecutive days but less than 90 consecutive days, with a common mental health disorder.

INTERVENTION

The intervention involved early referral to occupational health combined with standardised work-focused case management.

CONTROL/COMPARATOR: Participants in the control arm received care as usual.

PRIMARY OUTCOME

The primary outcome was the feasibility and acceptability of the intervention, study processes (including methods of recruiting participants) and data collection tools to measure return to work, episodes of sickness absence, workability (a worker's functional ability to perform their job), occupational functioning, symptomatology and cost-effectiveness proposed for use in a main trial.

RESULTS

Forty articles and two guidelines were included in an updated systematic review. A total of 49 of the 126 (39%) occupational health providers who were approached participated in a national survey of care as usual. Selected multidisciplinary stakeholders contributed to the development of the work-focused case management intervention (including a training workshop). Six NHS trusts (occupational health departments) agreed to take part in the study, although one trust withdrew prior to participant recruitment, citing staff shortages. At mixed intervention sites, participants were sequentially allocated to each arm, where possible. Approximately 1938 (3.9%) NHS staff from the participating sites were on sick leave with a common mental health disorder during the study period. Forty-two sick-listed NHS staff were screened for eligibility on receipt of occupational health management referrals. Twenty-four (57%) participants were consented: 11 (46%) received the case management intervention and 13 (54%) received care as usual. Follow-up data were collected from 11 out of 24 (46%) participants at 3 months and 10 out of 24 (42%) participants at 6 months. The case management intervention and case manager training were found to be acceptable and inexpensive to deliver. Possible contamination issues are likely in a future trial if participants are individually randomised at mixed intervention sites.

HARMS

No adverse events were reported.

LIMITATIONS

The method of identification and recruitment of eligible sick-listed staff was ineffective in practice because uptake of referral to occupational health was low, but a new targeted method has been devised.

CONCLUSION

All study questions were addressed. Difficulties raising organisational awareness of the study coupled with a lack of change in occupational health referral practices by line managers affected the identification and recruitment of participants. Strategies to overcome these barriers in a main trial were identified. The case management intervention was fit for purpose and acceptable to deliver in the NHS.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN14621901.

FUNDING

This project was funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment programme and will be published in full in ; Vol. 25, No. 12. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information.

摘要

背景

NHS 是英国最大的雇主。抑郁和焦虑是员工请病假的常见原因。有证据表明,基于病例管理模式并采用生物心理社会方法的干预措施可能具有成本效益,并能更早地促使患有常见精神健康障碍的员工重返工作岗位。

目的

目的是评估针对 NHS 请病假的任何常见精神健康障碍(例如抑郁症或焦虑症)员工进行早期职业健康转介和病例管理干预以促进其重返工作岗位的临床试验的可行性和可接受性。

设计

一项具有嵌入式过程评估和经济分析的多中心混合方法可行性研究。该研究包括更新的系统评价、对常规护理的调查以及与主要利益相关者协商制定的干预措施。尽管这不是一项随机对照试验,但研究设计包括两个臂,参与者接受干预或常规护理。

参与者

参与者为 NHS 员工,病假超过 7 天但少于 90 天,患有常见精神健康障碍。

干预

干预包括及早转介到职业健康中心,结合标准化以工作为重点的病例管理。

对照/比较:对照组参与者接受常规护理。

主要结果

主要结果是干预措施、研究过程(包括招募参与者的方法)和用于测量重返工作、病假发作、工作能力(工人履行工作职能的能力)、职业功能、症状和成本效益的工具的可行性和可接受性,这些都将用于主要试验。

结果

更新的系统评价中包括了 40 篇文章和 2 份指南。在研究过程中,总共联系了 126 名职业健康提供者中的 49 名(39%),其中 49 名参加了常规护理的全国性调查。选定的多学科利益相关者为以工作为重点的病例管理干预措施的制定做出了贡献(包括培训研讨会)。六个 NHS 信托基金(职业健康部门)同意参与研究,但由于员工短缺,一家信托基金在参与者招募前退出了。在混合干预地点,尽可能按顺序将参与者分配到每个臂。在研究期间,来自参与地点的大约 1938 名(3.9%)NHS 员工因常见精神健康障碍而请病假。收到职业健康管理转介后,对 42 名请病假的 NHS 员工进行了资格筛选。24 名(57%)参与者同意参加:11 名(46%)接受病例管理干预,13 名(54%)接受常规护理。在 3 个月时从 24 名(46%)参与者中收集了 11 名和在 6 个月时从 24 名(42%)参与者中收集了 10 名参与者的随访数据。病例管理干预和病例管理员培训被发现是可以接受的,并且成本低廉。如果在混合干预地点对参与者进行个体随机化,未来的试验中可能会出现潜在的污染问题。

危害

没有报告不良事件。

局限性

识别和招募符合条件的请病假员工的方法在实践中效果不佳,因为职业健康转介的接受率很低,但已经设计了一种新的有针对性的方法。

结论

所有研究问题都得到了解决。在提高对研究的组织认识方面存在困难,再加上直线经理对职业健康转介做法的改变不大,这影响了参与者的识别和招募。在主要试验中确定了克服这些障碍的策略。病例管理干预措施是适合在 NHS 提供的。

试验注册

当前对照试验 ISRCTN84342663。

资金

该项目由英国国家卫生研究院(NIHR)健康技术评估计划资助,将在 ; 第 25 卷,第 12 期全文发表。有关该项目的更多信息,请访问 NIHR 期刊库网站。

相似文献

2
Health screening clinic to reduce absenteeism and presenteeism among NHS Staff: eTHOS a pilot RCT.
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2024 Aug;12(23):1-105. doi: 10.3310/KDST3869.
8
Guided self-help for depression in autistic adults: the ADEPT feasibility RCT.
Health Technol Assess. 2019 Dec;23(68):1-94. doi: 10.3310/hta23680.

引用本文的文献

2
Supporting return to work after psychiatric hospitalization-A cluster randomized study (RETURN-study).
Eur Psychiatry. 2023 Jan 9;66(1):e9. doi: 10.1192/j.eurpsy.2022.2357.
3
Using mixed-methods in evidence-based nursing: a scoping review guided by a socio-ecological perspective.
J Res Nurs. 2022 Nov;27(7):639-652. doi: 10.1177/17449871221113740. Epub 2022 Sep 14.
5
Construction of Nursing Practice Model in Case Management of Concurrent Chemotherapy and Radiochemotherapy Treatment in Cervical Cancer.
Appl Bionics Biomech. 2022 Jun 17;2022:5450575. doi: 10.1155/2022/5450575. eCollection 2022.

本文引用的文献

1
Interventions to improve return to work in depressed people.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Oct 13;10(10):CD006237. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006237.pub4.
2
Managing common mental health disorders in healthcare workers.
Occup Med (Lond). 2019 Jun 24;69(4):290-293. doi: 10.1093/occmed/kqz068.
6
Determinants of Employment Outcome for the People with Schizophrenia Using the WHODAS 2.0.
J Occup Rehabil. 2019 Jun;29(2):375-383. doi: 10.1007/s10926-018-9794-6.
9
Prognostic factors for return to work of employees with common mental disorders: a meta-analysis of cohort studies.
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2017 Oct;52(10):1205-1215. doi: 10.1007/s00127-017-1402-0. Epub 2017 Jun 2.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验