Volker Daniëlle, Zijlstra-Vlasveld Moniek C, Anema Johannes R, Beekman Aartjan Tf, Brouwers Evelien Pm, Emons Wilco Hm, van Lomwel A Gijsbert C, van der Feltz-Cornelis Christina M
Trimbos Institute, Netherlands institute of mental health and addiction, Utrecht, Netherlands.
J Med Internet Res. 2015 May 13;17(5):e116. doi: 10.2196/jmir.4097.
Common mental disorders are strongly associated with long-term sickness absence, which has negative consequences for the individual employee's quality of life and leads to substantial costs for society. It is important to focus on return to work (RTW) during treatment of sick-listed employees with common mental disorders. Factors such as self-efficacy and the intention to resume work despite having symptoms are important in the RTW process. We developed "E-health module embedded in Collaborative Occupational health care" (ECO) as a blended Web-based intervention with 2 parts: an eHealth module (Return@Work) for the employee aimed at changing cognitions of the employee regarding RTW and a decision aid via email supporting the occupational physician with advice regarding treatment and referral options based on monitoring the employee's progress during treatment.
This study evaluated the effect of a blended eHealth intervention (ECO) versus care as usual on time to RTW of sick-listed employees with common mental disorders.
The study was a 2-armed cluster randomized controlled trial. Employees sick-listed between 4 and 26 weeks with common mental disorder symptoms were recruited by their occupational health service or employer. The employees were followed up to 12 months. The primary outcome measures were time to first RTW (partial or full) and time to full RTW. Secondary outcomes were response and remission of the common mental disorder symptoms (self-assessed).
A total of 220 employees were included: 131 participants were randomized to the ECO intervention and 89 to care as usual (CAU). The duration until first RTW differed significantly between the groups. The median duration was 77.0 (IQR 29.0-152.3) days in the CAU group and 50.0 (IQR 20.8-99.0) days in the ECO group (hazard ratio [HR] 1.390, 95% CI 1.034-1.870, P=.03). No significant difference was found for duration until full RTW. Treatment response of common mental disorder symptoms did not differ significantly between the groups, but at 9 months after baseline significantly more participants in the ECO group achieved remission than in the CAU group (OR 2.228, 95% CI 1.115-4.453, P=.02).
The results of this study showed that in a group of sick-listed employees with common mental disorders, applying the blended eHealth ECO intervention led to faster first RTW and more remission of common mental disorder symptoms than CAU.
Netherlands Trial Register NTR2108; http://www.trialregister.nl/trialreg/admin/rctview.asp?TC=2108. (Archived by WebCite at http://www.webcitation.org/6YBSnNx3P).
常见精神障碍与长期病假密切相关,这对员工个人生活质量有负面影响,并给社会带来巨大成本。对于患有常见精神障碍且处于病假状态的员工,在治疗期间关注其重返工作岗位(RTW)非常重要。自我效能感以及尽管有症状仍有复工意愿等因素在重返工作岗位的过程中很重要。我们开发了“嵌入协作职业健康护理的电子健康模块”(ECO),这是一种混合式的基于网络的干预措施,包括两个部分:一个面向员工的电子健康模块(Return@Work),旨在改变员工对重返工作岗位的认知;以及一个通过电子邮件提供的决策辅助工具,根据监测员工治疗期间的进展,为职业医生提供有关治疗和转诊选择的建议。
本研究评估了混合式电子健康干预措施(ECO)与常规护理相比,对患有常见精神障碍且处于病假状态的员工重返工作岗位时间的影响。
该研究是一项双臂整群随机对照试验。职业健康服务机构或雇主招募了病假时长在4至26周且有常见精神障碍症状的员工。对这些员工进行了长达12个月的随访。主要结局指标是首次重返工作岗位(部分或全部)的时间以及完全重返工作岗位的时间。次要结局是常见精神障碍症状的反应和缓解情况(自我评估)。
总共纳入了220名员工:131名参与者被随机分配到ECO干预组,89名被分配到常规护理(CAU)组。两组之间首次重返工作岗位的持续时间存在显著差异。CAU组的中位持续时间为77.0(四分位间距29.0 - 152.3)天,ECO组为50.0(四分位间距20.8 - 99.0)天(风险比[HR] 1.390,95%置信区间1.034 - 1.870,P = 0.03)。完全重返工作岗位的持续时间未发现显著差异。两组之间常见精神障碍症状的治疗反应没有显著差异,但在基线后9个月,ECO组实现症状缓解的参与者明显多于CAU组(比值比2.228,95%置信区间为1.115 - 4.453,P = 0.02)。
本研究结果表明,在患有常见精神障碍且处于病假状态的员工群体中,应用混合式电子健康ECO干预措施比常规护理能使首次重返工作岗位的时间更快,且常见精神障碍症状的缓解情况更好。
荷兰试验注册库NTR2108;http://www.trialregister.nl/trialreg/admin/rctview.asp?TC=2108。(由WebCite存档于http://www.webcitation.org/6YBSnNx3P)