Vitiello B, Malone R, Buschle P R, Delaney M A, Behar D
Department of Psychiatry, Medical College of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.
Hosp Community Psychiatry. 1990 Jan;41(1):63-7. doi: 10.1176/ps.41.1.63.
The reliability of diagnoses of 46 child psychiatric inpatients made using three independent instruments--an unstructured interview with the parent and child that produced the chart diagnosis, a structured interview with the parent, and a structured interview with the child--was assessed. These diagnoses were then compared with a review diagnosis, which was based on all information available at the patient's discharge. Substantial disagreement between the diagnoses resulting from the structured and unstructured interviews was found in one-third of the cases. The review diagnosis disagreed with the chart diagnosis in 33 percent of the cases but disagreed with the diagnosis resulting from the structured interview with the parent in 13 percent of the cases. While structured interviews can contribute to the standardization of diagnoses, the reliability and validity of child psychiatric diagnoses remain problematic.
对46名儿童精神科住院患者进行诊断的可靠性进行了评估,诊断使用了三种独立工具——与家长和孩子进行的非结构化访谈(得出病历诊断)、与家长进行的结构化访谈以及与孩子进行的结构化访谈。然后将这些诊断与基于患者出院时所有可用信息的复核诊断进行比较。在三分之一的病例中,发现结构化和非结构化访谈得出的诊断存在重大分歧。复核诊断在33%的病例中与病历诊断不一致,但在13%的病例中与对家长进行结构化访谈得出的诊断不一致。虽然结构化访谈有助于诊断的标准化,但儿童精神科诊断的可靠性和有效性仍然存在问题。