Nuti Sabina, Vainieri Milena, Frey Marco
Institue of Management, Sant'Anna School of Advanced Studies of Pisa, piazza Martiri della Libertà, 27 - 56127 Pisa, Italy.
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2012 Oct;25 Suppl 4:48-51. doi: 10.3109/14767058.2012.715022.
What are the implications of financial crisis on healthcare expenditure? This paper explores different approaches applied across European countries focusing on the role that managerial tools may have in coping with this challenge.
The paper reports the results of recent studies on responses to financial crisis from European countries and which are the techniques they had applied to reallocate resources.
Although resources scarcity, some governments did not reduce the healthcare expenditure because they believe in its focal role on the economic development and on maintaining social cohesion and protection of vulnerable people. Other countries decided a strong reduction of costs which often has affected services delivered. In both cases authors suggest to avoid across-the-board cuts in favor of approach involving priority setting.
The public sector has assumed new responsibilities following the global crisis and the rising demand for social services. Some countries shifted the healthcare costs from the public purse to private households undermining the survival of the health system and the universal coverage. A way to avoid this risk is based on the ability to share discussion about where to cut and where to reallocate resources.
金融危机对医疗保健支出有何影响?本文探讨了欧洲各国采用的不同方法,重点关注管理工具在应对这一挑战中可能发挥的作用。
本文报告了近期关于欧洲国家对金融危机的应对措施以及它们用于重新分配资源的技术的研究结果。
尽管资源稀缺,但一些政府并未削减医疗保健支出,因为他们相信其在经济发展、维持社会凝聚力和保护弱势群体方面的核心作用。其他国家则决定大幅削减成本,这往往影响了所提供的服务。在这两种情况下,作者都建议避免一刀切的削减,而应采用涉及确定优先事项的方法。
全球危机和对社会服务需求的增加使公共部门承担了新的责任。一些国家将医疗保健成本从公共资金转移到私人家庭,破坏了卫生系统的生存和全民覆盖。避免这种风险的一种方法是基于能够就何处削减和何处重新分配资源展开讨论的能力。