Suppr超能文献

空气中和盐水中的角膜曲率计测量球面软镜后顶点屈光度的比较。

A comparison of in-air and in-saline focimeter measurement of the back vertex power of spherical soft contact lenses.

机构信息

Department of Optometry & Visual Science, City University, London, UK.

出版信息

Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2012 Nov;32(6):508-17. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-1313.2012.00932.x. Epub 2012 Sep 7.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To compare the repeatability and validity of measurements of the back vertex power (BVP) of spherical soft contact lenses made in-air using the method specified in the International Standard (ISO 18369-3:2006) with the corresponding values when BVP was calculated from measurements made using a wet cell and focimeter method that is not approved by this Standard.

METHODS

The BVP of 20 hydrogel and 20 silicone hydrogel lenses, with labelled powers ranging from +8.00 to -12.00 D, were measured with a focimeter by two operators on two occasions in-air in accordance with the relevant International Standard. Equivalent sets of measurements were made with the lenses immersed in-saline within a wet cell and their BVPs in-air were calculated. The validity of each method was assessed by comparing their results with an instrument that used the Hartmann method.

RESULTS

The reliability results were generally a little better for the in-saline measurements than for the in-air measurements, although all reliability data demonstrated absolute values of mean errors (inter-operator and inter-session) that were <0.05 D for hydrogel lenses and <0.07 D for silicone hydrogel lenses. The in-air 95% confidence intervals were <0.45 D and <0.40 D for hydrogel and silicone hydrogel lenses, respectively and in-saline <0.39 and <0.31 D for hydrogel and silicone hydrogel lenses, respectively. The validity data revealed a relationship between measurement error and BVP for the in-air data (the focimeter overestimates the power of high plus and high minus lenses compared with the Hartmann instrument) and possibly a more complex relationship for the in-saline data. The 95% limits of agreement indicate better agreement for the in-saline validity data (-0.55 to +0.48 D for hydrogel lenses and -0.42 to +0.54 D for silicone hydrogel lenses) than those obtained in-air (-0.64 to +0.68 D for hydrogel lenses and -0.57 to +0.44 D for silicone hydrogel lenses).

CONCLUSIONS

Using equipment readily available in a clinical setting, the wet cell method of measurement of the BVP of spherical soft contact lenses has been shown to provide results for reliability and validity that were at least as good as those obtained with the in-air method approved by the International Standard.

摘要

目的

比较使用国际标准(ISO 18369-3:2006)规定的空气中测量方法测量的球形软隐形眼镜后顶点屈光度(BVP)的重复性和有效性与使用未经本标准批准的湿盒和焦度计方法测量得到的相应值。

方法

使用焦度计,由两名操作人员在空气中按照相关国际标准,两次对 20 片水凝胶和 20 片硅水凝胶隐形眼镜进行 BVP 测量,这些镜片的标签屈光度范围从+8.00 至-12.00 D。将镜片浸入湿盒内的盐水中进行等效测量,并计算其空气中的 BVP。通过将每种方法的结果与使用哈特曼法的仪器进行比较,评估每种方法的有效性。

结果

总体而言,湿盒内测量的可靠性结果通常比空气中测量的结果稍好,尽管所有可靠性数据都表明水凝胶镜片的平均误差(操作员间和会话间)绝对值均<0.05 D,硅水凝胶镜片的平均误差绝对值均<0.07 D。空气中的 95%置信区间分别为水凝胶镜片<0.45 D,硅水凝胶镜片<0.40 D,湿盒内分别为水凝胶镜片<0.39 D,硅水凝胶镜片<0.31 D。有效性数据表明,空气中数据的测量误差与 BVP 之间存在关系(焦度计高估了高正和高负镜片的屈光度,与哈特曼仪器相比),而湿盒内数据可能存在更复杂的关系。95%一致性界限表明,湿盒内有效性数据的一致性更好(水凝胶镜片为-0.55 至+0.48 D,硅水凝胶镜片为-0.42 至+0.54 D),而空气中的数据一致性较差(水凝胶镜片为-0.64 至+0.68 D,硅水凝胶镜片为-0.57 至+0.44 D)。

结论

使用临床环境中易于获得的设备,已经证明湿盒法测量球形软隐形眼镜的 BVP 的可靠性和有效性结果至少与国际标准批准的空气中方法一样好。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验