• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于时间的气味物体和效价感知解释。

A time-based account of the perception of odor objects and valences.

机构信息

Department of Neurology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL 60611, USA.

出版信息

Psychol Sci. 2012 Oct 1;23(10):1224-32. doi: 10.1177/0956797612441951. Epub 2012 Sep 6.

DOI:10.1177/0956797612441951
PMID:22961773
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3660998/
Abstract

Is human odor perception guided by memory or emotion? Object-centered accounts predict that recognition of unique odor qualities precedes valence decoding. Valence-centered accounts predict the opposite: that stimulus-driven valence responses precede and guide identification. In a speeded response time study, participants smelled paired odors, presented sequentially, and indicated whether the second odor in each pair belonged to the same category as the first (object evaluation task) or whether the second odor was more pleasant than the first (valence evaluation task). Object evaluation was faster and more accurate than valence evaluation. In a complementary experiment, participants performed an identification task, in which they indicated whether an odor matched the previously presented word label. Responses were quicker for odors preceded by semantically matching, rather than nonmatching, word labels, but results showed no evidence of interference from valence on nonmatching trials. These results are in accordance with object-centered accounts of odor perception.

摘要

人类的嗅觉感知是受记忆还是情感引导的?以物体为中心的解释预测,对独特气味质量的识别先于价值解码。以价值为中心的解释则预测相反的情况:即刺激驱动的价值反应先于并引导识别。在一项快速反应时间研究中,参与者闻到成对的气味,依次呈现,并指出每对中的第二气味是否与第一气味属于同一类别(物体评估任务),或者第二气味是否比第一气味更令人愉悦(价值评估任务)。物体评估比价值评估更快、更准确。在一项补充实验中,参与者执行了一项识别任务,他们要指出一种气味是否与之前呈现的单词标签匹配。对于由语义匹配而不是不匹配的单词标签所引导的气味,反应更快,但结果没有显示出价值在不匹配试验中产生干扰的证据。这些结果与气味感知的以物体为中心的解释一致。

相似文献

1
A time-based account of the perception of odor objects and valences.基于时间的气味物体和效价感知解释。
Psychol Sci. 2012 Oct 1;23(10):1224-32. doi: 10.1177/0956797612441951. Epub 2012 Sep 6.
2
High and low roads to odor valence? A choice response-time study.高与低气味效价之路?选择反应时研究。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2013 Oct;39(5):1205-11. doi: 10.1037/a0033682. Epub 2013 Jul 22.
3
Now you like me, now you don't: impact of labels on odor perception.现在你喜欢我,现在你不喜欢了:标签对嗅觉感知的影响。
Chem Senses. 2014 Feb;39(2):167-75. doi: 10.1093/chemse/bjt066. Epub 2013 Dec 13.
4
Odor Emotional Quality Predicts Odor Identification.气味的情感特质可预测气味识别。
Chem Senses. 2015 Sep;40(7):517-23. doi: 10.1093/chemse/bjv037. Epub 2015 Jul 3.
5
An odor is not worth a thousand words: from multidimensional odors to unidimensional odor objects.气味抵千言:从多维气味到单维气味物体。
Annu Rev Psychol. 2010;61:219-41, C1-5. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.60.110707.163639.
6
The fish is bad: Negative food odors elicit faster and more accurate reactions than other odors.鱼是臭的:与其他气味相比,负面食物气味会引发更快、更准确的反应。
Biol Psychol. 2010 May;84(2):313-7. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2010.03.006. Epub 2010 Mar 21.
7
Background odors affect behavior in a dot-probe task with emotionally expressive faces.背景气味在一项使用情绪表达性面孔的点探测任务中会影响行为。
Physiol Behav. 2019 Oct 15;210:112540. doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2019.05.001. Epub 2019 May 17.
8
Olfactory speed - Temporal odor processing of paired stimuli.嗅觉速度——配对刺激的时间性气味处理
Neuroscience. 2015 Jun 4;295:72-9. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2015.03.029. Epub 2015 Mar 23.
9
Bad odors stick better than good ones: Olfactory qualities and odor recognition.难闻的气味比好闻的气味更易留存:嗅觉特性与气味识别。
Exp Psychol. 2009;56(6):375-80. doi: 10.1027/1618-3169.56.6.375.
10
Semantic context facilitates odor identification in children and adults.语义语境有助于儿童和成人识别气味。
Dev Psychobiol. 2014 Apr;56(3):592-8. doi: 10.1002/dev.21124. Epub 2013 Jun 15.

引用本文的文献

1
A cognitive nose? Evaluating working memory benchmarks in the olfactory domain.有认知功能的鼻子?评估嗅觉领域的工作记忆基准。
Chem Senses. 2025 Jan 22;50. doi: 10.1093/chemse/bjaf008.
2
Human olfactory perception embeds fine temporal resolution within a single sniff.人类嗅觉感知在单次嗅探中嵌入了精细的时间分辨率。
Nat Hum Behav. 2024 Nov;8(11):2168-2178. doi: 10.1038/s41562-024-01984-8. Epub 2024 Oct 14.
3
Olfactory Categorization Is Shaped by a Transmodal Cortical Network for Evaluating Perceptual Predictions.嗅觉分类受评估感知预测的跨模态皮质网络塑造。

本文引用的文献

1
Olfactory predictive codes and stimulus templates in piriform cortex.嗅球皮层中的嗅觉预测代码和刺激模板。
Neuron. 2011 Oct 6;72(1):178-87. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2011.08.010.
2
Central mechanisms of odour object perception.气味物体感知的中枢机制。
Nat Rev Neurosci. 2010 Sep;11(9):628-41. doi: 10.1038/nrn2883. Epub 2010 Aug 11.
3
Global features of neural activity in the olfactory system form a parallel code that predicts olfactory behavior and perception.嗅觉系统中神经活动的全局特征形成了一种平行代码,可预测嗅觉行为和感知。
J Neurosci. 2024 May 29;44(22):e1232232024. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1232-23.2024.
4
Why human olfaction should not be modeled on theories and tasks of vision.为何人类嗅觉不应基于视觉的理论和任务来建模。
Front Psychol. 2023 Sep 27;14:1244480. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1244480. eCollection 2023.
5
Perceptual odor qualities predict successful odor identification in old age.感知气味质量可预测老年人成功识别气味的能力。
Chem Senses. 2022 Jan 1;47. doi: 10.1093/chemse/bjac025.
6
Pleasant and unpleasant odor identification ability is associated with distinct dimensions of negative symptoms transdiagnostically in psychotic disorders.愉快和不愉快气味识别能力与精神病性障碍中跨诊断负性症状的不同维度相关。
Schizophr Res. 2022 Oct;248:183-193. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2022.08.011. Epub 2022 Sep 6.
7
Spatiotemporal dynamics of odor representations in the human brain revealed by EEG decoding.EEG 解码揭示人类大脑中气味表示的时空动态。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2022 May 24;119(21):e2114966119. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2114966119. Epub 2022 May 18.
8
Smell-induced gamma oscillations in human olfactory cortex are required for accurate perception of odor identity.嗅觉诱导的人嗅觉皮层伽马振荡对于准确感知气味身份是必需的。
PLoS Biol. 2022 Jan 5;20(1):e3001509. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3001509. eCollection 2022 Jan.
9
Olfactory Language: Context Is Everything.嗅觉语言:情境至关重要。
Trends Cogn Sci. 2021 Jun;25(6):419-420. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2021.02.004. Epub 2021 Mar 20.
10
Olfactory Influences on Visual Categorization: Behavioral and ERP Evidence.嗅觉对视觉分类的影响:行为和 ERP 证据。
Cereb Cortex. 2020 Jun 1;30(7):4220-4237. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhaa050.
J Neurosci. 2010 Jul 7;30(27):9017-26. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0398-10.2010.
4
An odor is not worth a thousand words: from multidimensional odors to unidimensional odor objects.气味抵千言:从多维气味到单维气味物体。
Annu Rev Psychol. 2010;61:219-41, C1-5. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.60.110707.163639.
5
Sequential unfolding of novelty and pleasantness appraisals of odors: evidence from facial electromyography and autonomic reactions.气味新颖性和愉悦度评估的顺序性展开:来自面部肌电图和自主神经反应的证据。
Emotion. 2009 Jun;9(3):316-28. doi: 10.1037/a0015369.
6
Odor quality coding and categorization in human posterior piriform cortex.人类梨状后皮质中的气味质量编码与分类
Nat Neurosci. 2009 Jul;12(7):932-8. doi: 10.1038/nn.2324. Epub 2009 May 31.
7
Attention to odor modulates thalamocortical connectivity in the human brain.对气味的注意调节人脑中丘脑皮质的连接性。
J Neurosci. 2008 May 14;28(20):5257-67. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5607-07.2008.
8
Odour perception: an object-recognition approach.气味感知:一种物体识别方法。
Perception. 2007;36(12):1821-33. doi: 10.1068/p5563.
9
Predicting odor pleasantness from odorant structure: pleasantness as a reflection of the physical world.从气味分子结构预测气味愉悦度:愉悦度作为物理世界的一种反映。
J Neurosci. 2007 Sep 12;27(37):10015-23. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1158-07.2007.
10
Methods for building an olfactometer with known concentration outcomes.构建具有已知浓度结果的嗅觉计的方法。
J Neurosci Methods. 2007 Mar 15;160(2):231-45. doi: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2006.09.008. Epub 2006 Nov 1.