• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

综合生活方式干预对药物治疗的稳定型心血管疾病患者心血管风险因素的影响与常规护理相比:一项随机对照试验。

The effect of a comprehensive lifestyle intervention on cardiovascular risk factors in pharmacologically treated patients with stable cardiovascular disease compared to usual care: a randomised controlled trial.

机构信息

Department of Health Sciences and the EMGO + Institute for Health and Care Research, Faculty of Earth and Life Sciences, VU University Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1085, 1081HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2012 Sep 10;12:71. doi: 10.1186/1471-2261-12-71.

DOI:10.1186/1471-2261-12-71
PMID:22962863
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3479017/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The additional benefit of lifestyle interventions in patients receiving cardioprotective drug treatment to improve cardiovascular risk profile is not fully established.The objective was to evaluate the effectiveness of a target-driven multidisciplinary structured lifestyle intervention programme of 6 months duration aimed at maximum reduction of cardiovascular risk factors in patients with cardiovascular disease (CVD) compared with usual care.

METHODS

A single centre, two arm, parallel group randomised controlled trial was performed. Patients with stable established CVD and at least one lifestyle-related risk factor were recruited from the vascular and cardiology outpatient departments of the university hospital. Blocked randomisation was used to allocate patients to the intervention (n = 71) or control group (n = 75) using an on-site computer system combined with allocations in computer-generated tables of random numbers kept in a locked computer file. The intervention group received the comprehensive lifestyle intervention offered in a specialised outpatient clinic in addition to usual care. The control group continued to receive usual care. Outcome measures were the lifestyle-related cardiovascular risk factors: smoking, physical activity, physical fitness, diet, blood pressure, plasma total/HDL/LDL cholesterol concentrations, BMI, waist circumference, and changes in medication.

RESULTS

The intervention led to increased physical activity/fitness levels and an improved cardiovascular risk factor profile (reduced BMI and waist circumference). In this setting, cardiovascular risk management for blood pressure and lipid levels by prophylactic treatment for CVD in usual care was already close to optimal as reflected in baseline levels. There was no significant improvement in any other risk factor.

CONCLUSIONS

Even in CVD patients receiving good clinical care and using cardioprotective drug treatment, a comprehensive lifestyle intervention had a beneficial effect on some cardiovascular risk factors. In the present era of cardiovascular therapy and with the increasing numbers of overweight and physically inactive patients, this study confirms the importance of risk factor control through lifestyle modification as a supplement to more intensified drug treatment in patients with CVD.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ISRCTN69776211 at http://www.controlled-trials.com.

摘要

背景

在接受心脏保护药物治疗以改善心血管风险状况的患者中,生活方式干预的额外益处尚未完全确定。目的是评估 6 个月的目标驱动多学科结构化生活方式干预计划的有效性,该计划旨在最大限度地降低心血管疾病(CVD)患者的心血管风险因素,与常规护理相比。

方法

进行了一项单中心、双臂、平行组随机对照试验。从大学医院的血管和心脏病门诊部门招募了患有稳定的已确诊 CVD 和至少一种与生活方式相关的风险因素的患者。使用现场计算机系统与保存在锁定计算机文件中的随机数生成表的计算机生成表中的分配相结合,对患者进行分组(n=71)或对照组(n=75)的分组。干预组在专门的门诊诊所接受综合生活方式干预,同时接受常规护理。对照组继续接受常规护理。主要结局是与生活方式相关的心血管风险因素:吸烟、体力活动、体质、饮食、血压、血浆总/HDL/LDL 胆固醇浓度、BMI、腰围和药物变化。

结果

干预导致体力活动/体质水平提高,心血管风险因素谱改善(BMI 和腰围降低)。在这种情况下,常规护理中通过预防性治疗 CVD 对血压和血脂水平的心血管风险管理已经接近最佳,反映在基线水平。其他任何风险因素都没有显著改善。

结论

即使在接受良好临床护理和使用心脏保护药物治疗的 CVD 患者中,综合生活方式干预对某些心血管风险因素也有有益影响。在心血管治疗的新时代,随着超重和体力活动不足患者的数量不断增加,本研究证实了通过生活方式改变控制风险因素作为 CVD 患者强化药物治疗的补充的重要性。

试验注册

ISRCTN69776211 在 http://www.controlled-trials.com。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7191/3479017/554b528fcac6/1471-2261-12-71-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7191/3479017/554b528fcac6/1471-2261-12-71-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7191/3479017/554b528fcac6/1471-2261-12-71-1.jpg

相似文献

1
The effect of a comprehensive lifestyle intervention on cardiovascular risk factors in pharmacologically treated patients with stable cardiovascular disease compared to usual care: a randomised controlled trial.综合生活方式干预对药物治疗的稳定型心血管疾病患者心血管风险因素的影响与常规护理相比:一项随机对照试验。
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2012 Sep 10;12:71. doi: 10.1186/1471-2261-12-71.
2
A telephone-supported cardiovascular lifestyle programme (CLIP) for lipid reduction and weight loss in general practice patients: a randomised controlled pilot trial.电话支持的心血管生活方式计划(CLIP)在一般实践患者中降低血脂和减轻体重:一项随机对照试验。
Public Health Nutr. 2014 Mar;17(3):640-7. doi: 10.1017/S1368980013000220. Epub 2013 Mar 4.
3
Cardiovascular disease risk reduction in rural China: a clustered randomized controlled trial in Zhejiang.中国农村心血管疾病风险降低:一项在浙江开展的整群随机对照试验
Trials. 2013 Oct 25;14:354. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-14-354.
4
5
Influence on lifestyle measures and five-year coronary risk by a comprehensive lifestyle intervention programme in patients with coronary heart disease.冠心病患者综合生活方式干预计划对生活方式措施及五年冠心病风险的影响。
Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil. 2003 Dec;10(6):429-37. doi: 10.1097/01.hjr.0000107024.38316.6a.
6
No significant improvement of cardiovascular disease risk indicators by a lifestyle intervention in people with familial hypercholesterolemia compared to usual care: results of a randomised controlled trial.与常规护理相比,生活方式干预对家族性高胆固醇血症患者心血管疾病风险指标无显著改善:一项随机对照试验的结果
BMC Res Notes. 2012 Jul 4;5:181. doi: 10.1186/1756-0500-5-181.
7
Cost-effectiveness of Mediterranean diet and physical activity in secondary cardiovascular disease prevention: results from the UCC-SMART cohort study.地中海饮食和身体活动在二级心血管疾病预防中的成本效益:UCC-SMART 队列研究的结果。
Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2024 Sep 6;31(12):1460-1468. doi: 10.1093/eurjpc/zwae123.
8
Design of a RCT evaluating the (cost-) effectiveness of a lifestyle intervention for male construction workers at risk for cardiovascular disease: the health under construction study.一项评估生活方式干预对有心血管疾病风险的男性建筑工人(成本)效益的随机对照试验设计:在建健康研究
BMC Public Health. 2008 Jan 3;8:1. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-8-1.
9
Effects on physical activity, physical fitness and well-being in a 36-months randomized controlled study, comparing a multimodal hospital-based intervention programme for primary cardiovascular prevention with usual care.在一项为期36个月的随机对照研究中,比较基于医院的多模式初级心血管预防干预项目与常规护理对身体活动、体能和幸福感的影响。
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2024 Apr 25;24(1):225. doi: 10.1186/s12872-024-03892-1.
10

引用本文的文献

1
A systematic review and meta-analysis testing the effect of lifestyle modification and medication optimization programs on cholesterol and blood pressure in patients with cardiovascular disease.一项系统性综述和荟萃分析,检验生活方式改变和药物优化方案对心血管疾病患者胆固醇和血压的影响。
Syst Rev. 2025 Jul 28;14(1):153. doi: 10.1186/s13643-025-02857-5.
2
Comprehensive Cardiovascular Risk Factor Control With a Mobile Health Cardiovascular Risk Self-Management Program.移动健康心血管风险自我管理项目对心血管危险因素的综合控制。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2024 May 21;13(10):e033328. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.123.033328. Epub 2024 May 17.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Multidisciplinary structured lifestyle intervention reduces the estimated risk of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality.多学科结构化生活方式干预可降低心血管疾病发病和死亡的预估风险。
Neth Heart J. 2004 Oct;12(10):443-449.
2
Participating in cardiac rehabilitation: a systematic review and meta-synthesis of qualitative data.参与心脏康复:定性数据的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2012 Jun;19(3):494-503. doi: 10.1177/1741826711409326.
3
CONSORT 2010 statement: Updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials.
Influence of Lifestyle Changes on Cardiovascular Diseases in Saudi Arabia: A Systematic Literature Review.
沙特阿拉伯生活方式改变对心血管疾病的影响:一项系统文献综述
Cureus. 2023 Jun 7;15(6):e40075. doi: 10.7759/cureus.40075. eCollection 2023 Jun.
4
Effects of lifestyle interventions on cardiovascular risk factors in South Asians: a systematic review and meta-analysis.生活方式干预对南亚人心血管危险因素的影响:系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMJ Open. 2022 Dec 9;12(12):e059666. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-059666.
5
Effectiveness of letters to patients with or without Cochrane blogshots on 10-year cardiovascular risk change among women in menopausal transition: 6-month three-arm randomized controlled trial.给处于绝经过渡期的女性患者写信,有无 Cochrane 博克肖特对其 10 年心血管风险变化的影响:6 个月三臂随机对照试验。
BMC Med. 2022 Oct 20;20(1):381. doi: 10.1186/s12916-022-02555-2.
6
A New Health Promotion Program That Includes Wadaiko Rhythm Exercise to Maintain the Health of Persons Excluded from Receiving Specific Health Guidance.一种新的健康促进计划,包括和太鼓节奏运动,以维持被排除在特定健康指导之外的人群的健康。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jul 12;19(14):8520. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19148520.
7
Effects of intervention on lifestyle changes among coronary artery disease patients: A 6-month follow-up study.干预对冠心病患者生活方式改变的影响:一项 6 个月随访研究。
Nurs Open. 2022 Jul;9(4):2024-2036. doi: 10.1002/nop2.1212. Epub 2022 Apr 17.
8
The effect of behaviour change interventions on changes in physical activity and anthropometrics in ambulatory hospital settings: a systematic review and meta-analysis.行为改变干预对门诊环境中身体活动和人体测量学变化的影响:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2021 Jan 7;18(1):7. doi: 10.1186/s12966-020-01076-6.
9
Exploring the impact of sleep and stress on daily physical activity of cardiac patients: a preliminary study.探究睡眠和压力对心脏病患者日常身体活动的影响:一项初步研究。
Hippokratia. 2019 Jan-Mar;23(1):15-20.
10
Evaluation of the impact of the GRACE risk score on the management and outcome of patients hospitalised with non-ST elevation acute coronary syndrome in the UK: protocol of the UKGRIS cluster-randomised registry-based trial.评价 GRACE 风险评分对英国非 ST 段抬高型急性冠状动脉综合征住院患者管理和结局的影响:英国 GRIS 基于群组随机注册研究的方案。
BMJ Open. 2019 Sep 5;9(9):e032165. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-032165.
《CONSORT 2010声明:报告平行组随机试验的更新指南》
J Pharmacol Pharmacother. 2010 Jul;1(2):100-7. doi: 10.4103/0976-500X.72352.
4
A meta-analysis of randomized control trials of home-based secondary prevention programs for coronary artery disease.一项关于冠心病家庭二级预防项目随机对照试验的荟萃分析。
Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil. 2010 Jun;17(3):261-70. doi: 10.1097/HJR.0b013e32833090ef.
5
Is the MacNew quality of life questionnaire a useful diagnostic and evaluation instrument for cardiac rehabilitation?MacNew生活质量问卷是心脏康复中一种有用的诊断和评估工具吗?
Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil. 2008 Oct;15(5):516-20. doi: 10.1097/HJR.0b013e328303402b.
6
Nurse-coordinated multidisciplinary, family-based cardiovascular disease prevention programme (EUROACTION) for patients with coronary heart disease and asymptomatic individuals at high risk of cardiovascular disease: a paired, cluster-randomised controlled trial.针对冠心病患者和心血管疾病高危无症状个体的护士协调多学科家庭式心血管疾病预防项目(EUROACTION):一项配对、整群随机对照试验。
Lancet. 2008 Jun 14;371(9629):1999-2012. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)60868-5.
7
Motives for (not) participating in a lifestyle intervention trial.(不)参与生活方式干预试验的动机。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2008 Apr 10;8:17. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-8-17.
8
Psychosocial interventions for smoking cessation in patients with coronary heart disease.冠心病患者戒烟的心理社会干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008 Jan 23(1):CD006886. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006886.
9
European guidelines on cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice: full text. Fourth Joint Task Force of the European Society of Cardiology and other societies on cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice (constituted by representatives of nine societies and by invited experts).欧洲临床实践中心血管疾病预防指南:全文。欧洲心脏病学会及其他学会关于临床实践中心血管疾病预防的第四联合工作组(由九个学会的代表及特邀专家组成)。
Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil. 2007 Sep;14 Suppl 2:S1-113. doi: 10.1097/01.hjr.0000277983.23934.c9.
10
Secondary prevention programmes for coronary heart disease: a meta-regression showing the merits of shorter, generalist, primary care-based interventions.冠心病二级预防项目:一项Meta回归分析显示基于初级保健的简短通科干预措施的优势。
Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil. 2007 Aug;14(4):538-46. doi: 10.1097/HJR.0b013e328013f11a.