• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评价 GRACE 风险评分对英国非 ST 段抬高型急性冠状动脉综合征住院患者管理和结局的影响:英国 GRIS 基于群组随机注册研究的方案。

Evaluation of the impact of the GRACE risk score on the management and outcome of patients hospitalised with non-ST elevation acute coronary syndrome in the UK: protocol of the UKGRIS cluster-randomised registry-based trial.

机构信息

Clinical Trials Research Unit, Leeds Institute for Clinical Trials Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.

Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2019 Sep 5;9(9):e032165. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-032165.

DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2019-032165
PMID:31492797
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6731819/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

For non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTEACS) there is a gap between the use of class I guideline recommended therapies and clinical practice. The Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events (GRACE) risk score is recommended in international guidelines for the risk stratification of NSTEACS, but its impact on adherence to guideline-indicated treatments and reducing adverse clinical outcomes is unknown. The objective of the UK GRACE Risk Score Intervention Study (UKGRIS) trial is to assess the effectiveness of the GRACE risk score tool and associated treatment recommendations on the use of guideline-indicated care and clinical outcomes.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

The UKGRIS, a parallel-group cluster randomised registry-based controlled trial, will allocate hospitals in a 1:1 ratio to manage NSTEACS by standard care or according to the GRACE risk score and associated international guidelines. UKGRIS will recruit a minimum of 3000 patients from at least 30 English National Health Service hospitals and collect healthcare data from national electronic health records. The co-primary endpoints are the use of guideline-indicated therapies, and the composite of cardiovascular death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, new onset heart failure hospitalisation or cardiovascular readmission at 12 months. Secondary endpoints include duration of inpatient hospital stay over 12 months, EQ-5D-5L responses and utilities, unscheduled revascularisation and the components of the composite endpoint over 12 months follow-up.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

The study has ethical approval (North East - Tyne & Wear South Research Ethics Committee reference: 14/NE/1180). Findings will be announced at relevant conferences and published in peer-reviewed journals in line with the funder's open access policy.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

ISRCTN29731761; Pre-results.

摘要

简介

对于非 ST 段抬高型急性冠状动脉综合征(NSTEACS),指南推荐的 I 类治疗方法在临床实践中的应用存在差距。国际指南推荐全球急性冠状动脉事件注册(GRACE)风险评分用于 NSTEACS 的风险分层,但它对指南推荐治疗方法的依从性和降低不良临床结局的影响尚不清楚。英国 GRACE 风险评分干预研究(UKGRIS)试验的目的是评估 GRACE 风险评分工具及其相关治疗建议对指南推荐的护理使用和临床结局的有效性。

方法与分析

UKGRIS 是一项平行组聚类随机登记对照试验,将以 1:1 的比例将医院分配到标准护理组或根据 GRACE 风险评分和相关国际指南进行管理。UKGRIS 将从至少 30 家英国国家卫生服务医院招募至少 3000 名患者,并从国家电子健康记录中收集医疗保健数据。主要终点是指南推荐治疗方法的使用,以及 12 个月时心血管死亡、非致死性心肌梗死、新发心力衰竭住院或心血管再入院的复合终点。次要终点包括 12 个月内住院时间、EQ-5D-5L 反应和效用、非计划性血运重建以及 12 个月随访期间复合终点的组成部分。

伦理与传播

该研究已获得伦理批准(东北-泰恩威尔南研究伦理委员会参考号:14/NE/1180)。研究结果将在相关会议上公布,并按照资助者的开放获取政策在同行评议期刊上发表。

试验注册号

ISRCTN29731761;预结果。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e286/6731819/f5b37b8755fa/bmjopen-2019-032165f03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e286/6731819/1e6632ad9076/bmjopen-2019-032165f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e286/6731819/068eee4e599d/bmjopen-2019-032165f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e286/6731819/f5b37b8755fa/bmjopen-2019-032165f03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e286/6731819/1e6632ad9076/bmjopen-2019-032165f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e286/6731819/068eee4e599d/bmjopen-2019-032165f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e286/6731819/f5b37b8755fa/bmjopen-2019-032165f03.jpg

相似文献

1
Evaluation of the impact of the GRACE risk score on the management and outcome of patients hospitalised with non-ST elevation acute coronary syndrome in the UK: protocol of the UKGRIS cluster-randomised registry-based trial.评价 GRACE 风险评分对英国非 ST 段抬高型急性冠状动脉综合征住院患者管理和结局的影响:英国 GRIS 基于群组随机注册研究的方案。
BMJ Open. 2019 Sep 5;9(9):e032165. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-032165.
2
Effectiveness of GRACE risk score in patients admitted to hospital with non-ST elevation acute coronary syndrome (UKGRIS): parallel group cluster randomised controlled trial.GRACE 风险评分在非 ST 段抬高型急性冠状动脉综合征患者住院治疗中的效果(英国 GRIS 研究):平行组聚类随机对照试验。
BMJ. 2023 Jun 14;381:e073843. doi: 10.1136/bmj-2022-073843.
3
A cluster randomized trial of objective risk assessment versus standard care for acute coronary syndromes: Rationale and design of the Australian GRACE Risk score Intervention Study (AGRIS).急性冠状动脉综合征客观风险评估与标准治疗的整群随机试验:澳大利亚GRACE风险评分干预研究(AGRIS)的原理与设计
Am Heart J. 2015 Nov;170(5):995-1004.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2015.07.032. Epub 2015 Aug 16.
4
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
5
Prognostic benefit from an early invasive strategy in patients with non-ST elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTEACS): evaluation of the new risk stratification in the NSTEACS European guidelines.非 ST 段抬高型急性冠状动脉综合征(NSTEACS)患者早期侵入性策略的预后获益:NSTEACS 欧洲指南中新风险分层的评估。
Clin Res Cardiol. 2021 Sep;110(9):1464-1472. doi: 10.1007/s00392-021-01829-8. Epub 2021 Mar 9.
6
Comparing TIMI, HEART, and GRACE Risk Scores to Predict Angiographic Severity of Coronary Artery Disease and 30-Day Major Adverse Cardiac Events in Emergency Department Patients with NSTEACS.比较 TIMI、HEART 和 GRACE 风险评分预测非 ST 段抬高型急性冠脉综合征急诊患者冠状动脉疾病的血管造影严重程度和 30 天主要不良心脏事件。
Prehosp Disaster Med. 2023 Dec;38(6):740-748. doi: 10.1017/S1049023X23006490. Epub 2023 Oct 13.
7
Objective Risk Assessment vs Standard Care for Acute Coronary Syndromes: A Randomized Clinical Trial.急性冠状动脉综合征的目标风险评估与标准护理的随机临床试验。
JAMA Cardiol. 2021 Mar 1;6(3):304-313. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2020.6314.
8
Walking beyond the GRACE (Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events) model in the death risk stratification during hospitalization in patients with acute coronary syndrome: what do the AR-G (ACTION [Acute Coronary Treatment and Intervention Outcomes Network] Registry and GWTG [Get With the Guidelines] Database), NCDR (National Cardiovascular Data Registry), and EuroHeart Risk Scores Provide?在急性冠状动脉综合征患者住院期间的死亡风险分层中,超越 GRACE(全球急性冠状动脉事件注册)模型:AR-G(ACTION [急性冠状动脉治疗和干预结果网络]注册和 GWTG [遵循指南]数据库)、NCDR(国家心血管数据注册)和 EuroHeart 风险评分提供了什么?
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2012 Nov;5(11):1117-25. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2012.06.023.
9
Underestimated and under-recognized: the late consequences of acute coronary syndrome (GRACE UK-Belgian Study).被低估和未被充分认识到的:急性冠脉综合征的晚期后果(GRACE UK-比利时研究)。
Eur Heart J. 2010 Nov;31(22):2755-64. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehq326. Epub 2010 Aug 30.
10
The prognostic utility of GRACE risk score in predictive cardiovascular event rate in STEMI patients with successful fibrinolysis and delay intervention in non PCI-capable hospital: a retrospective cohort study.GRACE风险评分对非PCI能力医院中成功溶栓及延迟干预的ST段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)患者心血管事件发生率的预测价值:一项回顾性队列研究
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2016 Nov 8;16(1):212. doi: 10.1186/s12872-016-0383-3.

引用本文的文献

1
Effectiveness of the GRACE risk score according to troponin elevation in patients admitted with non-ST elevation acute coronary syndrome: a post hoc analysis of the UKGRIS parallel group cluster randomised controlled trial.非ST段抬高型急性冠状动脉综合征患者中根据肌钙蛋白升高情况评估GRACE风险评分的有效性:UKGRIS平行组整群随机对照试验的事后分析
Open Heart. 2025 Jun 26;12(1):e003213. doi: 10.1136/openhrt-2025-003213.
2
Impact of Admission Ward on Long-Term Outcomes in Patients with Non-ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction.入院病房对非ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者长期预后的影响
J Clin Med. 2025 Feb 15;14(4):1284. doi: 10.3390/jcm14041284.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Use of clinical risk stratification in non-ST elevation acute coronary syndromes: an analysis from the CONCORDANCE registry.非 ST 段抬高型急性冠状动脉综合征中临床风险分层的应用:来自 CONCORDANCE 注册研究的分析。
Eur Heart J Qual Care Clin Outcomes. 2018 Oct 1;4(4):309-317. doi: 10.1093/ehjqcco/qcy002.
2
Guidelines for the Content of Statistical Analysis Plans in Clinical Trials.临床试验中统计分析计划内容的指南。
JAMA. 2017 Dec 19;318(23):2337-2343. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.18556.
3
Association of Clinical Factors and Therapeutic Strategies With Improvements in Survival Following Non-ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction, 2003-2013.
Use cases of registry-based randomized controlled trials-A review of the registries' contributions and constraints.
基于注册的随机对照试验的应用案例——对注册研究的贡献和限制的回顾。
Clin Transl Sci. 2024 Nov;17(11):e70072. doi: 10.1111/cts.70072.
4
Inequalities in care delivery and outcomes for myocardial infarction, heart failure, atrial fibrillation, and aortic stenosis in the United Kingdom.英国心肌梗死、心力衰竭、心房颤动和主动脉瓣狭窄的护理提供及治疗结果方面的不平等现象。
Lancet Reg Health Eur. 2023 Oct 4;33:100719. doi: 10.1016/j.lanepe.2023.100719. eCollection 2023 Oct.
5
Effectiveness of GRACE risk score in patients admitted to hospital with non-ST elevation acute coronary syndrome (UKGRIS): parallel group cluster randomised controlled trial.GRACE 风险评分在非 ST 段抬高型急性冠状动脉综合征患者住院治疗中的效果(英国 GRIS 研究):平行组聚类随机对照试验。
BMJ. 2023 Jun 14;381:e073843. doi: 10.1136/bmj-2022-073843.
6
External validation of the GRACE risk score in patients with myocardial infarction in Hungary.GRACE风险评分在匈牙利心肌梗死患者中的外部验证
Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc. 2023 Apr 24;46:101210. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcha.2023.101210. eCollection 2023 Jun.
7
Relation of GRACE Risk Score to Coronary Lipid Core Plaques in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome.急性冠脉综合征患者中GRACE风险评分与冠状动脉脂质核心斑块的关系
Life (Basel). 2023 Feb 24;13(3):630. doi: 10.3390/life13030630.
8
Registry randomised trials: a methodological perspective.注册随机对照试验:一种方法学视角。
BMJ Open. 2023 Mar 1;13(3):e068057. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-068057.
9
Contributions of event rates, pre-hospital deaths, and deaths following hospitalisation to variations in myocardial infarction mortality in 326 districts in England: a spatial analysis of linked hospitalisation and mortality data.英格兰 326 个区的事件发生率、院前死亡和住院后死亡对心肌梗死死亡率变化的影响:基于住院和死亡率相关数据的空间分析。
Lancet Public Health. 2022 Oct;7(10):e813-e824. doi: 10.1016/S2468-2667(22)00108-6. Epub 2022 Jul 16.
10
Evaluation and Comparison of the STIMUL Extended and Simplified Risk Scores for Predicting Two-Year Death in Patients Following ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction.STIMUL 扩展简化评分与简化评分预测 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者两年死亡风险的评估与比较
Medicina (Kaunas). 2021 Dec 10;57(12):1349. doi: 10.3390/medicina57121349.
2003-2013 年非 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者生存改善与临床因素和治疗策略的关系。
JAMA. 2016 Sep 13;316(10):1073-82. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.10766.
4
Performance of the GRACE Risk Score 2.0 Simplified Algorithm for Predicting 1-Year Death After Hospitalization for an Acute Coronary Syndrome in a Contemporary Multiracial Cohort.当代多种族队列中GRACE风险评分2.0简化算法预测急性冠状动脉综合征住院后1年死亡情况的性能
Am J Cardiol. 2016 Oct 15;118(8):1105-1110. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2016.07.029. Epub 2016 Jul 29.
5
Excess mortality and guideline-indicated care following non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction.非ST段抬高型心肌梗死后的超额死亡率和指南推荐治疗
Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care. 2017 Aug;6(5):412-420. doi: 10.1177/2048872616647705. Epub 2016 May 3.
6
A cluster randomized trial of objective risk assessment versus standard care for acute coronary syndromes: Rationale and design of the Australian GRACE Risk score Intervention Study (AGRIS).急性冠状动脉综合征客观风险评估与标准治疗的整群随机试验:澳大利亚GRACE风险评分干预研究(AGRIS)的原理与设计
Am Heart J. 2015 Nov;170(5):995-1004.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2015.07.032. Epub 2015 Aug 16.
7
2015 ESC Guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes in patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevation: Task Force for the Management of Acute Coronary Syndromes in Patients Presenting without Persistent ST-Segment Elevation of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC).2015年欧洲心脏病学会(ESC)非持续性ST段抬高型急性冠脉综合征患者管理指南:欧洲心脏病学会(ESC)非持续性ST段抬高型急性冠脉综合征患者管理工作组
Eur Heart J. 2016 Jan 14;37(3):267-315. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehv320. Epub 2015 Aug 29.
8
Late Consequences of Acute Coronary Syndromes: Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events (GRACE) Follow-up.急性冠状动脉综合征的晚期后果:全球急性冠状动脉事件注册研究(GRACE)随访
Am J Med. 2015 Jul;128(7):766-75. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2014.12.007. Epub 2014 Dec 29.
9
Should patients with acute coronary disease be stratified for management according to their risk? Derivation, external validation and outcomes using the updated GRACE risk score.急性冠状动脉疾病患者是否应根据其风险进行分层管理?使用更新后的GRACE风险评分进行推导、外部验证及结果分析。
BMJ Open. 2014 Feb 21;4(2):e004425. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-004425.
10
An examination of clinical intuition in risk assessment among acute coronary syndromes patients: observations from a prospective multi-center international observational registry.急性冠状动脉综合征患者风险评估中的临床直觉研究:一项前瞻性多中心国际观察性注册研究的观察结果。
Int J Cardiol. 2014 Feb 1;171(2):209-16. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2013.12.010. Epub 2013 Dec 19.